• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Author of 'Pedophile's Guide' Arrested on Obscenity Charges

Status
Not open for further replies.
In fact I will go so far as to say I believe that Kev is an old banned member. I don't know ANYBODY that just joins a forum that starts into people like he has. If he is a new member, I don't think he'll last long.
 
Well, that's rediculous. We are advocating following the laws of our land. Why would doing that mean we want to become lawless?

I think that guy Kev was definitely a troll. Calling me a "rapist lover" for standing up for a persons constitutional rights to write a book screams "troll" louder than I've ever heard. Anyone else here thinking "troll?"

Not me. I'm no troll. Just a man with strong opinions on pedophilia and no patience for those such as yourself who will pick and choose your constitutional amendments while defending a man charged with a crime like this. Why? You are the people who feel MSM is bad (1st amendment), Muslims should not be able to worship (1st amendment), and that this union should be broken (treason). I will not now, nor ever, allow conservatives to discount the damage done to kids who go through this.

Frankly, some of you are less than pigs.

BTW, speaking about someone and not to someone is a violation of TOS. Kind of like the guy who said "**** you" to me earlier. I've been playing nice so far.
 
Last edited:
Not me. I'm no troll. Just a man with strong opinions on pedophilia and no patience for those such as yourself who will pick and choose your constitutional amendments while defending a man charged with a crime like this. Why? You are the people who feel MSM is bad (1st amendment), Muslims should not be able to worship (1st amendment), and that this union should be broken (treason). I will not now, nor ever, allow conservatives to discount the damage done to kids who go through this.

Frankly, some of you are less than pigs.

BTW, speaking about someone and not to someone is a violation of TOS. Kind of like the guy who said "**** you" to me earlier. I've been playing nice so far.

Whoa, defending a man who has been accused of a crime like this? Do you even know what his crime was? And what is wrong with defending him, is he not INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW?

Please tell me what constitutional amendments I "pick and choose" to defend? You've been here a grand total of 3 weeks. I highly doubt you have read all 700+ posts of mine to make any kind of a conclusion about me. So kiss off. Shove your head up your ass, so that way you can't continue pull **** out of it like you've been doing on this thread all night.

And believe me, you are skirting the edge. I've been here way longer than you, I can see you lasting a very short period here. All the name calling will get you hit with the mods. I promise.
 
Last edited:
In fact I will go so far as to say I believe that Kev is an old banned member. I don't know ANYBODY that just joins a forum that starts into people like he has. If he is a new member, I don't think he'll last long.

Nope, not a banned member but an old hand with folks like yourself. What, you think any decent person will let you defend a pedophile?

I didn't start in to "people." I started in with ultra-cons. Ignorant ones. About four of them, all defending f*cking children.
 
Whoa, defending a man who has been accused of a crime like this? Do you even know what his crime was? And what is wrong with defending him, is he not INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW?

And believe me, you are skirting the edge. I've been here way longer than you, I can see you lasting a very short period here. All the name calling will get you hit with the mods. I promise.

What name calling?

Skirting the edge? Wow, they might make me leave here? Man, nothing left but suicide.

As for "innocent until proven guilty," your joking right? Tell that to Jose Padilla. Innocent until proven guilty. Right... Libertarian Dude, you're a conservative who wants to legally smoke pot and buy hookers. You can't even get honest about that.
 
From my perspective every law has its exceptions. Even the bill of rights. While ordinarily I would be among the first to support someone publishing...well just about anything, this is one subject with which I believe there should be an exception. I acknowledge that I am extremely biased and emotional on this subject though. While I was never molested as a child my nieces were. And I raised them. More than their mother did for the most part. They were in effect my own children, at least thats how I thought of them. Then one day I find out what had been happening for years. Anyways, let's just suffice it to say that as far as I'm concerned this is one guy that should be strung up.

Does this make me hypocritical considering I defend Assaunge? Most definately. But in this case I will accept it and not blink even once about it.

I think that guy Kev was definitely a troll. Calling me a "rapist lover" for standing up for a persons constitutional rights to write a book screams "troll" louder than I've ever heard. Anyone else here thinking "troll?"

I don't blame Kev for his reactions. I may have not experianced the molestation myself but it still hit close to home and I'm quite emotional about it. I can't imagine what it must be like for him who experianced it first hand.
 
Nope, not a banned member but an old hand with folks like yourself. What, you think any decent person will let you defend a pedophile?

I didn't start in to "people." I started in with ultra-cons. Ignorant ones. About four of them, all defending f*cking children.

Quite frankly, considering how many times you've mentioned having sex with children, that worries me a bit.

A fetish, maybe?

And being a pedophile isn't illegal, nothing to defend, really.

I don't blame Kev for his reactions. I may have not experianced the molestation myself but it still hit close to home and I'm quite emotional about it. I can't imagine what it must be like for him who experianced it first hand.

And I do blame him. I don't care what he went through, he has no right to attack me on this forum, and I have a feeling he's going to wake up with some presents under his PM tree from the mods.
 
Last edited:
Whoa, defending a man who has been accused of a crime like this? Do you even know what his crime was? And what is wrong with defending him, is he not INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW?

Please tell me what constitutional amendments I "pick and choose" to defend? You've been here a grand total of 3 weeks. I highly doubt you have read all 700+ posts of mine to make any kind of a conclusion about me. So kiss off. Shove your head up your ass, so that way you can't continue pull **** out of it like you've been doing on this thread all night.

And believe me, you are skirting the edge. I've been here way longer than you, I can see you lasting a very short period here. All the name calling will get you hit with the mods. I promise.

Wow, so now your threatening me? Comments about anatomy? And I'm skirting the edge? Wow.
 
As for "innocent until proven guilty," your joking right?

No, actually I'm not. Last time I checked, that's how our justice system worked. Amirite?

I think you lost a few brownie points with people who support your cause because even they feel this man is innocent until proven guilty. After all, what crime did he commit? You STILL can't tell me that.

1. He didn't rape anyone.
2. He didn't molest anyone
3. He has never been tested to be officially a pedophile (as far as I know anyway)
4. He hasn't touched anyone
5. He has never been accused of touching anyone

Facts get in the way of emotions, I know.

And I'm not threatening you at all. You call me a rapist lover, I tell you shove your head in your ass. WTF you gonna do about it?
 
Last edited:
From my perspective every law has its exceptions. Even the bill of rights. While ordinarily I would be among the first to support someone publishing...well just about anything, this is one subject with which I believe there should be an exception. I acknowledge that I am extremely biased and emotional on this subject though. While I was never molested as a child my nieces were. And I raised them. More than their mother did for the most part. They were in effect my own children, at least thats how I thought of them. Then one day I find out what had been happening for years. Anyways, let's just suffice it to say that as far as I'm concerned this is one guy that should be strung up.

Does this make me hypocritical considering I defend Assaunge? Most definately. But in this case I will accept it and not blink even once about it.



I don't blame Kev for his reactions. I may have not experianced the molestation myself but it still hit close to home and I'm quite emotional about it. I can't imagine what it must be like for him who experianced it first hand.

Thank you. These folks haven't seemed to notice that this thread is my problem and I don't think I'm gonna change my mind or attitude. Why do we have predator laws? Why can a man be imprisoned for child porn on his computer? Because it is the destroyer of lives and quite frankly, I'm appalled by the responses here.
 
Thank you. These folks haven't seemed to notice that this thread is my problem and I don't think I'm gonna change my mind or attitude. Why do we have predator laws? Why can a man be imprisoned for child porn on his computer? Because it is the destroyer of lives and quite frankly, I'm appalled by the responses here.

You can't compare child porn to a book. More credibility lost. Damn, do you still have any?
 
No, actually I'm not. Last time I checked, that's how our justice system worked. Amirite?

No. You are not right. He who has the money walks. Everyone else is pretty much f*cked. Have you ever been around the legal system? Suburbanites go home, they have lawyers. Urban and rural folks get screwed with Public Defenders.
 
Nope, not a banned member but an old hand with folks like yourself. What, you think any decent person will let you defend a pedophile?

I didn't start in to "people." I started in with ultra-cons. Ignorant ones. About four of them, all defending f*cking children.
Dude I can agree with you that this book is nothing but a piece of filth that should never see the light of day, but why you gotta say stuff like this?
 
Dude I can agree with you that this book is nothing but a piece of filth that should never see the light of day, but why you gotta say stuff like this?

Because he's an asshole, why else?
 
How about we just become lawless then?

If anarchy were possible, it would be best. But it's not, so we have some amount of law based on the protection and proliferation of the rights and liberties of the individual. How about we stop with ridiculous overstatements and hyperbole and start up with a bit of the ol intellectually valid argument?
 
I can and I did. BTW, I wasn't talking to you. Haven't been for awhile.

I have a right to reply to every post on this thread. So kiss my ass.

Anyone wanna make any bets if this cat lasts to new years? I doubt he will.

And for the record, since you are obviously too stupid to see it without being explained to like a 2 year old, I'm not defending the contents of the book, I'm defending his GOD DAMN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO WRITE THE ****ING THING. Is that clear? I think it's as sick and disturbing as anyone else, as I have stated before, but sick doesn't equal illegal.

Damn, I've had more productive chats with a stump grinder.
 
Last edited:
Dude I can agree with you that this book is nothing but a piece of filth that should never see the light of day, but why you gotta say stuff like this?

Because they are defending a man who has decided to teach people how to f*ck kids? There is no nice way to put it.
 
Thank you. These folks haven't seemed to notice that this thread is my problem and I don't think I'm gonna change my mind or attitude. Why do we have predator laws? Why can a man be imprisoned for child porn on his computer? Because it is the destroyer of lives and quite frankly, I'm appalled by the responses here.

I'm appalled by those willing to use government force against the rights of others whom have not themselves infringed upon the rights of anyone.
 
I have a right to reply to every post on this thread. So kiss my ass.

Anyone wanna make any bets if this cat lasts to new years? I doubt he will.

Actually, you guys are the lucky ones. I could have been reporting every one of you all night long. Now, I'm not sure if I'll make it to New Year, but I definitely won't make it to New Years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom