You're complaining about gay men going all stereotypical flamboyant in the service.. but when gay women do it, they are usually "butch" and "manly"
So is that ok? A tough "butch" can serve, but a "girly man" can't?
Don't get mad.. I am not putting words in your mouth. I just want clarification, and it seems like you are kind of stereotyping here so I am doing it too
"And in the end, we were all just humans, drunk on the idea that love, only love, could heal our brokenness."
I guess we'll have to stop kicking out linguistic specialists that we desperately need to decode chatter due to the death of DADT.
92% of the military stated that they knew gay members in their units and saw no detrimental changes.
This has nothing to do with defense.
If you don't like gays as Navy Pride doesn't, that's fine. Just don't hide it under some bull**** reason like defense.
"If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu
Personally, as I have always said, I don't hate homosexuals. Religiously, I disagree with their lifestyle. Furthermore, I don't wish to see soldiers being "forced" to act as homosexuals, be threatened with sensivity training, or be subjucated to such influence against their will. Meaning, being forced to accept it. The soldiers should be allowed to not shower openly with homosexual men; not using absolutes, one would be unwise to not understand possibilities.