qwertyuiop
Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2010
- Messages
- 178
- Reaction score
- 35
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Of course you think that's what it means.
But, actually, I'm talking about how be violated Army regulations in his crusade against DADT.
Here is a photgraph of Lt. Choi attending a political rally, in uniform. A violation of Army Regulations.
Another photograph of Lt. Choi egaging in unauthorized political speech. Another violation of Army Regulations.
And, another of Lt. Choi enagaging in political activities, while in uniform. Again, an illegal act, in accordance with Army Regulations.
Any officer that doesn't conduct himself IAW with the regulations and laws of the United States military, is a piece of **** and therefore a substandard officer. It doesn't matter which regulation and laws that are being violated.
Those laws are unconstitutional. He has every right to speak out against a bigoted and unfair practice. And calling him a piece of **** for challenging a homophobic policy that got him kicked out of the Army.
I also have a question. About 65 years ago, blacks were not allowed in the US military. If, hypothetically, you couldn't tell that African-Americans were African-Americans by sight, and those laws were still in place, and someone like Lt. Choi was speaking out against these racist regulations, would you call him a piece of **** because he did so while in uniform?