• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arrest made in plot to blow up area military recruiting center

What evidence have you encountered that indicates a prevalent mentality that attempts to push a radical agenda? Where are the massive (or atleast significant) calls for an inclusion of theology w/ state legislation from the oh so intrusive radical islam? It appears that atheists are more apt to remove God from governing institutions at a rate that out-paces muslims trying to include it (if it even exists). How large is the muslim caucas in this country?

My evidence shows itself in the lack of meaningful instances people can point to that suggests an aggressive movement of radicalized islam in this country.

There are two methods of war going on, one from the militants and one from the moderates.

I think we know how the militants operate. These are the ones who will riot and murder of something like the Mohammed cartoons, intimidating anyone critical of Islam either through the courts, charging of "racist" or "Islamophobia" and so on, or merely remarking that it can't be helped if someone mind kill them for making an offensive remark concerning Mohammed.. This has led to self censorship, of course.

The 'moderates' will be be like the recent case of woman who is suing the school board because she can't travel to Mecca while school is in session. The idea is to claim special rights because you are a Muslims and charges of religious discrimination if you don't get your way. Of course this could allow the militants to move in also if things don't go in their favour.

Thus the attack is on more than one level. Islam could never conquer the West on military terms so they'll do it domestically through differing methods. You'll notice a big change by 2020 but it will have arrived a little at a time, which is why its called Stealth Jihad.

Opposing Views: School District Won't Let Teacher Go to Mecca; She Sues

It should be noted here that the US Attorney General has come out in support of this woman and will be involved in the legal process. This should involve quite a precedent.


FrontPage Magazine - The Muslim Brotherhood "Project"

FrontPage Magazine - The Muslim Brotherhood "Project" (Continued)
 
Last edited:
There are two methods of war going on, one from the militants and one from the moderates.

I think we know how the militants operate. These are the ones who will riot and murder of something like the Mohammed cartoons, intimidating anyone critical of Islam either through the courts, charging of "racist" or "Islamophobia" and so on, or merely remarking that it can't be helped if someone mind kill them for making an offensive remark concerning Mohammed.. This has led to self censorship, of course.

The 'moderates' will be be like the recent case of woman who is suing the school board because she can't travel to Mecca while school is in session. The idea is to claim special rights because you are a Muslims and charges of religious discrimination if you don't get your way. Of course this could allow the militants to move in also if things don't go in their favour.

People suing an organization over religious beliefs/perceived requirements is nothing exclusive to people of the islamic faith. Take Mark Buehler, who (in march) filed a similar lawsuit with the equal employment opportunity commission because he feels he (a baptist) was forced to work on Sundays (the Sabbath). Even with cases like these... there is no proof of some sort of stealth move to change the American way of life. They're filing lawsuits because they felt they were victims, and playing the victim isn't (by any measure) an indication of covert non-violent terrorism. Damn those stealth baptists...
 
People suing an organization over religious beliefs/perceived requirements is nothing exclusive to people of the islamic faith. Take Mark Buehler, who (in march) filed a similar lawsuit with the equal employment opportunity commission because he feels he (a baptist) was forced to work on Sundays (the Sabbath). Even with cases like these... there is no proof of some sort of stealth move to change the American way of life. They're filing lawsuits because they felt they were victims, and playing the victim isn't (by any measure) an indication of covert non-violent terrorism. Damn those stealth baptists...

OK, you haven't read the articles and have no nterest, Fair enough,

You may feel you know better but there are many Muslims themselves who are saying otherwise.
 
What evidence have you encountered that indicates a prevalent mentality that attempts to push a radical agenda? Where are the massive (or atleast significant) calls for an inclusion of theology w/ state legislation from the oh so intrusive radical islam? It appears that atheists are more apt to remove God from governing institutions at a rate that out-paces muslims trying to include it (if it even exists). How large is the muslim caucas in this country?

My evidence shows itself in the lack of meaningful instances people can point to that suggests an aggressive movement of radicalized islam in this country.

This last sentence is clear as a bell evidence that you haven't done the homework on Stealth Jihad, and you are commenting on something you are unschooled. You , like many people, simply don't know how much you don't know. "Lack of meaningful instances" ? LOL. It's like saying Babe Ruth wasn't a good home run hitter. What instances can anyone show of Babe Ruth ever hitting very many home runs ?" LOL.

All right, Mr. Talk Without Researching, I have already pointed to dozens of meaningful instances (they are all connected to the long list of names & things associated with Stealth Jihad). It's a very decentralized thing. Do you expect Grant or me to sit here and type out the hundreds (if not thousands of examples) ? The very fact that you are unaware of all these proves that you just haven't done the reading. So here it is again. Read, Baby Read. Then come back, fully informed, and participate in the discussion from a point of knowledge. These names and things are all taken from the book "They Must Be Stopped" by Brigitte Gabriel. You can look them up individually in the book (page #s provided), or you can Google them. Talking from ignorance (simply because you haven't committed the research time/effort) doesn't help anyone here.


1. How many of the 5 books I suggested have you read ? (careful - there could be a quiz)

a. They Must Be Stopped, Brigitte Gabriel.

b. Stealth Jihad, Robert Spencer.

c. Muslim Mafia, P. David Gaubatz, Paul Sperry:

d. Infiltration, Paul Sperry.

e. Shariah : the Threat to America, Center for Security Policy.

2. How many of these people can you identify and how they're connected to Islamization (AKA Stealth Jihad) ?

Ibin Tamiyah, the Madhi, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, Sami al-Arian, Ramadan Abdallah Shallah, Mazen al-Najjar, Richard A. Clarke, Imam Muzzamil Siddiqui, Susan Douglas, Peter DiGangi, William Bennetta, Gilbert Sewall (pg. 96), Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, al-Hajj Talib'Abur, Rashid Sahmsi Ali, Khalid Latif, Omar Mohammedi, Joe Kaufman, Chantal Carnes, Hasan al-Banna (creator of the Muslim Brotherhood-I'll give you that one), Tariq Ramadan, Siraj Wahhaj, Mozen Mokhtar, Nouman Ali Khan, Abdul Malik (pg. 103), Imam Badawi, Br. Jawad Ahmad, Hassan Abbas, Mullah Abdul Rashid Ghazi, Sheik Mjed 'Abd al-Rahman al-Firian, Prince Sultan Ibn Abd al-'Aziz, Ali al-Ahmed, Itamar Marcus, Barbara Cook, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, Mohammed Osman Idris, Mohammed el-Yacoubi, Abu Abdullah, Baitullah Mehsud, Yunis al-Astal, Zeyno Baran (pg. 122) Aaron Klein, Muhammad Abdel-El, Sheik Yasser Hamad, Nur Mohammad, Ahmed Yassin (deceased), Sheik Abdel Rahman, Sheik Mohammed bin Rashid AL Maktoum, Abdullah Azzam, Fazlur Rehman Khalil (pg. 128), Mohammad Elachmi Hamdi, Bat Ye'or, Max Steenberghe, Anders Fogh Ramussen, Paul Jeeves (pg. 139), Yusuf al-Qarodawi, Bashar al-Assad, Robert S. Leiken, Theo Van Gogh, Michel Gurfinkel, Imam Ahmed Salam, Piet Hein Donner, Miguel Angel Toma (pg.152), Salah Yassin, Hassan Nasrallah, Ahmed Assad Barakat, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Bashar al-Assad, Adolpho Aguilar Zinser, Joseph Farah, Nabil al-Marabh, Raed Hijazi, David Harris, Syed Mumtaz Ali, Omar Ahmad, Ibrahim Hooper, Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani, Dr. Paul Williams (pg. 167), Hassan al Turabi, Clement Rodney Hampton-El, Kevin James, Warner MacKenzie, Sayeed Abdul A'la Maududi, Abdullah Yusef Ali, Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall, Nessim Joseph Dawood, Mohammed Habib Shakir, Arthur John Arberry, Aqsa Parvez, Atefeh Rajabi, (pg. 179), Francis Bok, Michael Coren, Homaidan Ali Al-Turki, Sheik Saleh Al-Fawzan, Paul Marshall, Koenraad Elst, Tom Clancy, Phil Alden Robinson, Michael Graham, Thomas Klocek, Stephen Coughlin, Hasham Islam, Steven Emerson, Mordechai Nisan, Abduraman Alamoudi, Ramadan Abdallah Shallah, Musa Abu Marzook, Keith Ellison (pg. 200), Abdullah al-Arian, Jamal-al-Din al-Afghani, James Woolsey, Walid Phares, Guy Rodgers, Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer.

3. How many of these things related to Islamization can you identify and say how they are related ?

Hijra, jizyah, Istanbul, Al-Quds, Al-Aqsa mosque, Napoleon Bonaparte (pg. 36), treaty of Al-Hudaybiyah, Oslo Accords, the Mahdi, Al-Ansar, 2006 Pentagon report : "Motivations of Muslim Suicide Bombers" (pg.63), "The Project", the Muslim Brotherhood, the Ikhwan, Taqiyya (pg. 76), Da'wa, Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Holy Land Foundation trials - 2007 & 2008, Khalil Gibran Academy, US Treasury Dept. (Office of Foreign Asset Control), Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Muslim American Society (MSA), United States Counterinsurgency Manual FM 3-24, US Justice Dept. report - 2004 (pg. 82), US Justice Dept. report - 2007, abeds, North American Islamic Trust, Islamic Council for North America, United Association for Studies and Research, Muslim American Youth Association, the Hamas Charter, Islamic Academy of Florida (pg. 89), Palestinian Islamic Jihad, American Youth Academy, New Horizons Schools, DawaNet—to link • to serve: Home with sections entitled "How to Make America an Islamic Nation" and Da'wa in Public Schools, Excelsior Elementary School, Thomas Moore Law Center, Islamic Saudi Academy, "The Islam Project" by the Council on Islamic Education, the Arab World History Notebook, "Across the Centuries", California Academy of Sciences, "World Cultures : A Global Mosaic", American Textbook Council (pg. 96), "Islam and the Textbooks", Arab American Family Support Center (AAFSC), Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood's Boy Scout program (MIB), Americans Against Hate, CAIR Watch, the Young Muslims, Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Jamaat-e-Islami, Young Muslim Sisters (YMS), Middle East Media Research Institute (pg. 105), US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), Freedom House, Institute for Gulf Affairs, Palestinian Media Watch (pg. 110), "Contemporary Problems", "History of the Arabs and the World in the 20th Century", Reading and Text Part II, Association of Independent Schools, ISA accreditation, Center for Religious Freedom, Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami, Islamic Party of Liberation, Al-Aksa TV of Hamas, Hudson institute (pg. 119), Popular Resistance Committee, "Schmoozing With Terrorists", US House of Representitives, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (pg.124), "Eurabia, the Euro-Arab Axis", European Union, the Arab League,"Foreign Affairs" - "Europe's Angry Muslims", Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Sharee Council of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, Immigration and National Security Program at the Nixon Center (pg. 140), Sukuk, Sharia compliant banks, Saxony-Anhalt, piggy banks in England, foot washing basins (Kansas City Airport & University of Michigan), "Britain's Daily Mail" - "Multiculturalsim Drives Young Muslims to Shun British Values", Nationa Intelligence Council, www.islamonline.net, "Valeurs Actuelles", the triple border region, UN Security Council, House Homeland Security Committee subcommittee on investigations report : "A Line In the Sand: Confronting the Threat At the Southwest Border", OTMs, Jamaat ul-Fuqra (pg. 156), Muslims of the Americas, the FBI, Canadian Security Intelligence Service, "TD Monthly", halal chicken, ACLU, the Date Frappuccino, Open Society Foundation, Whiting Foundation, hijab, Transportation & Safety Admin. (TSA), "New Media Journal" report - "In the Belly of the Beast: Jamaat ul-Fuqra, Jamaat ul-Fuqra mosque (Brooklyn, NY), Koran: 4:34, honor killings, the Alec file (pg. 167), Jamiyyat Ul-Islam, It's the Ideology Stupid,Tad-ru-bu-hu-nna, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (pg. 177), UN Children's Fund, the Population Council - 2003 survey, m'uta, Haratines, Janjaweed, Dinka tribe, "Escape From Slavery" (pg. 185), Toronto Sun online - "Slavery Lives in the Sudan", Middle East Forum - "The Problem with Slavery", Saudi Arabia Senior Council of Clerics, Human Rights Watch, Middle East Forum, Copts, Baha'i sect of Islam, "Islam : From Toleration to Terror" (pg. 188), Hizb ut-Tahrir, Jyllands-Posten, "The Sum of All Fears" (pg. 193), University of South Florida, Palistinian Islamic Jihad, "Future Jihad" (pg.215).

I can identify every one of these people and things, and I'm just a novice in this subject. That might give you an idea of how green you are in it. That's OK. Everyone starts out that way. Important thing is to get informed, and talk from strength. Talking, while uninformed, is about as hard to spot as an elephant in an open field.
 
Last edited:
This last sentence is clear as a bell evidence that you haven't done the homework on Stealth Jihad, and you are commenting on something you are unschooled. You , like many people, simply don't know how much you don't know.

It's the typical liberal knee-jerk reaction, Protectionist, feeling that there is a line which must not be crossed for fear of being named "Racist", "Islamophobe", "paranoid", oir any of the other epithets many use as a substitute for facts or honest debate.

He's a product of the environment that has created this somewhat parallel universe between what's really happening and that which people refuse to see, or even try to understand. Something similar happened during the Cold War..
 
What....The....****!
 
It's a nice thought. Loving your enemies. Only problem is, loving jihadists, whether they be violent now, or Stealth Jihadists ("moderate" now, violent later) is asking to have millions of people killed, subjugated, enslaved, pedophiled, etc. As a protectionist, that is unacceptable to me, and I don't care who said it.

That's fine, as long as you are consistent. But too many ultra-conservatives like to pretend they're Jesus People, too (and most actually believe they are).
 
It's the typical liberal knee-jerk reaction, Protectionist, feeling that there is a line which must not be crossed for fear of being named "Racist", "Islamophobe", "paranoid", oir any of the other epithets many use as a substitute for facts or honest debate.

He's a product of the environment that has created this somewhat parallel universe between what's really happening and that which people refuse to see, or even try to understand. Something similar happened during the Cold War..

That, or ultra-cons are really, really paranoid. I'm goin' with the latter.

As for your ideas that ignorance created this nation's attitudes toward the world, I suggest you are way off on that one. Freedom Of Religion formed the national consciousness. We do not turn our backs on the weak, the victimized, the exploited - regardless of who they are. We chose to be a predominantly Christian nation and certain responsibilities come with that, both foreign and domestic. Again, I didn't write the book.

Here's another Gem for you fine ultra-cons: Luke 14:12-14

"Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee. But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind: And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just."

I really like the KJV, don't you? Something about the formal olde English. Love it.
 
"Lack of meaningful instances" ? LOL. It's like saying Babe Ruth wasn't a good home run hitter. What instances can anyone show of Babe Ruth ever hitting very many home runs ?"

Statistics that highlight homerun counts. Stealth Jihad is about re-shaping western civilization with islamic law and cultural subversion... is it not? How many times has that happened? Certainly not on the scale I, or anyone not delusioned with paranoia, would call significant.

Do you expect Grant or me to sit here and type out the hundreds (if not thousands of examples) ?

Thousands? Not anymore... you would've done it already had you actually been able to. Now I'll just settle for 50 or so proven instances of a change in tide toward sharia law in this country.
 
OK, you haven't read the articles and have no nterest, Fair enough

Your example failed... that's it. A muslim woman filing a lawsuit due to religious beliefs is just the same as a baptist man doing the same for the same reason... yet only the muslim woman doing so is a sign of a stealth jihadist agenda. Laughable.

You may feel you know better but there are many Muslims themselves who are saying otherwise.

The are muslims that disagree with those muslims. See how we can go in circles with such a notion?
 
The are muslims that disagree with those muslims. See how we can go in circles with such a notion?

Yes, Muslims will disagree with Muslims, and frequently kill each other when they do, but that banality is not what's under discussion.

If you don't understand what's being said, and are not interested in learning, there is little point in your being involved in this thread.
 
Lol - Well, Europe doesn't have the House of Representatives to deal with. Nor the Senate. Nor the Executive. Nor the Judicial, which is pretty conservative at this point. They also don't have the 4th Estate, The Press. And finally, at least at this point, the United States is a UNIFIED nation with a strong central government, not a bunch of nation/states claiming their rights over The Union with no cohesive policy (which, ironically, is what the Federalists wanted back in the Articles of Confederation days, and what the Tea Party/Libertarians think they want now).

In all honesty, I don't feel America has a "Muslim problem" at all, despite what those with a fear-dependent income may tell us.

The Muslim problem exists in different degrees throughout the world. It may not be as bad in the U.S. as other countries but that doesn't mean we ignore it. I hate for peaceful Muslims to have to endure scrutiny brought on them through no personal fault of there own. But I choose not to ignore reality.
 
Yes, Muslims will disagree with Muslims, and frequently kill each other when they do

Ah... I suppose billions of peaceful muslims agree on all topics... making death the most frequent solution if disagreements ever arise.

If you don't understand what's being said, and are not interested in learning, there is little point in your being involved in this thread.

To the contrary... you're not interested in mirror incidents that counter your arguments. You don't get to introduce an occurrence into the topic as if proof of some sort of stealth jihadist agenda (muslim woman suing over unpaid leave for religious trip) without acknowledging that suits over religious claims are not exclusive to any one religion... especially when I present examples. Instead, you'll resort to this "if you don't understand" routine in a trivial attempt to claim victory and move on. That card won't work.
 
The Muslim problem exists in different degrees throughout the world. It may not be as bad in the U.S. as other countries but that doesn't mean we ignore it. I hate for peaceful Muslims to have to endure scrutiny brought on them through no personal fault of there own. But I choose not to ignore reality.

Well, we could do what Roosevelt did with Japanese Americans, but more thorough. Inter them all.

In the United States, there are essentially three categories of Muslims: 1) immigrants; 2) American converts/reverts to Islam; and 3) those born to the first two groups as Muslims. As of 2008, Muslims make up 2.11% of the population. I would think, given the size of the Muslim population in this country, eradication - or eternal interment - should be a piece of cake.

We should inter them all, in Gitmo, so we can avoid complaints that people don't want to imprison possible terrorists in their states. Then we should forget about them.

Who's next? Hasidic Jews? Catholics? Scientologists (personally, I like that idea)? Mormons? Snake-handling Pentecostals? Liberals? Conservatives? Shriners? Masons? Local Chamber of Commerce? My point is, people are afraid of Muslims, okay. But I hear no ideas, only fears. How do you resolve the fear without shredding the constitution? And where were the anti-Muslim sentiments when Mr. Bush was president? I don't get it.

What's your solution? One that doesn't set precedence and can't easily be used against organizations and churches. I don't understand what people are thinking on this one in light of our constitution.
 
Last edited:
Ah... I suppose billions of peaceful muslims agree on all topics... making death the most frequent solution if disagreements ever arise.



To the contrary... you're not interested in mirror incidents that counter your arguments. You don't get to introduce an occurrence into the topic as if proof of some sort of stealth jihadist agenda (muslim woman suing over unpaid leave for religious trip) without acknowledging that suits over religious claims are not exclusive to any one religion... especially when I present examples. Instead, you'll resort to this "if you don't understand" routine in a trivial attempt to claim victory and move on. That card won't work.

You're too late, E Pluribus. Although most of America is still oblivious to Stealth Jihad (they,ve doing a good job of keeping it quiet), it is not oblivious to the US Congress. Right now, Rep. Peter King (R-NY), incoming Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee is taking on the political "correctness" so common to Stealth Jihad, and has already announced that he will hold hearings on the radicalization of American Muslims ( a prime aspect of Stealth Jihad).
So, you can come on these pages and pretend that there is no Stealth Jihad, while the US Congress is holding hearings about it, and I'm sure the many instances of Stealth Jihad from school textbooks, to university teacher propaganda, to the foot washing basins, to the pass given to illegal Muslim parkers causing traffic congestion in New York, to attempted lawsuits based on false claims of discrimination, to false claims by Muslims against protectionists (as in the Stephen Coughlin case), to all the activities uncovered in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, to the Muslim Brotherhood's Project Dec. 1, 1982, to the MB's memorandum of 1991, to halal foods in restaurants and cafeterias, to Fortune 500 companies setting aside prayer times for Muslims (while non-Muslim workers keep on working), to changes in policies to allow beards and hijabs, to the millions of $$$ being lost by private companies and government agencies to provide sensitivity training to employees, so as to not offend Muslims, etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseum.
Here's a way for Muslims to not be offended. Let's just outlaw Islam in the USA entirely, convert all mosques into other uses, cancel all plans to build more mosques or Islamic centers, and make the practice of preaching Islam illegal, as it should be since it is seditious, by virtue of advocating the overthrow of the US government, by virtue of replacing the US Constitution with Sharia law.
Unlike what the Stealth Jihadist Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf (leader of the Ground Zero mosque project) claims (that Sharia law is compliant with the US Constitution), nothing could be further from the truth. Islamic law demands total obedience to it, and to no other law. As such, it is 100% incompatible with the US Constitution (and scores of American laws) which is clear just in Article VI of the Constitution alone (the Supremacy clause) which states "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States... shall be the supreme Law of the Land.."
So keep telling us E Pluribus, that there is no such thing as Stealth Jihad, while in the first few months of 2011, it becomes the biggest issue in US national politics, and the mainstream media finally is now forced to start reporting about it, and will be doing exactly that, day in and day out.
BTW E Pluribus. Are you a Muslim ? Member of CAIR maybe ? ISNA ? MPAC ? Doesn't matter. Stealth Jihad, in 2011, becomes Exposed Jihad.
 
Last edited:
Well, we could do what Roosevelt did with Japanese Americans, but more thorough. Inter them all.

In the United States, there are essentially three categories of Muslims: 1) immigrants; 2) American converts/reverts to Islam; and 3) those born to the first two groups as Muslims. As of 2008, Muslims make up 2.11% of the population. I would think, given the size of the Muslim population in this country, eradication - or eternal interment - should be a piece of cake.

We should inter them all, in Gitmo, so we can avoid complaints that people don't want to imprison possible terrorists in their states. Then we should forget about them.

Who's next? Hasidic Jews? Catholics? Scientologists (personally, I like that idea)? Mormons? Snake-handling Pentecostals? Liberals? Conservatives? Shriners? Masons? Local Chamber of Commerce? My point is, people are afraid of Muslims, okay. But I hear no ideas, only fears. How do you resolve the fear without shredding the constitution? And where were the anti-Muslim sentiments when Mr. Bush was president? I don't get it.

What's your solution? One that doesn't set precedence and can't easily be used against organizations and churches. I don't understand what people are thinking on this one in light of our constitution.

The solution is (as stated in my 11:05 pm post, right here) to ban Islam in the United States, based on it's violation of Article VI of the US Constitution (the Supremacy clause).
 
Last edited:
Yes, Muslims will disagree with Muslims, and frequently kill each other when they do, but that banality is not what's under discussion.

If you don't understand what's being said, and are not interested in learning, there is little point in your being involved in this thread.

It's beginning to appear that his point is to advance the cause of the Stealth Jihadists. Why ? Because he's one of them ?
 
BTW E Pluribus. Are you a Muslim ? Member of CAIR maybe ? ISNA ? MPAC ? Doesn't matter. Stealth Jihad, in 2011, becomes Exposed Jihad.

Ever heard of the rule of law? We have that here. It actually works until people start making exceptions based on their own, individual fears. Peter King is an ass. Always has been. Entire websites are devoted to his silliness. Here's another gem from ol' Pete.

Republican Congressman Peter King asserted that the publication of classified diplomatic cables is, "Worse even than a physical attack on Americans."

Really Peter? Really? People like yourself claim love and loyalty to the constitution - until it's inconvenient or difficult. Why not trust that which you claim to love? You know, the Judicial Branch of government? One of the three in the constitution?
 
The solution is (as stated in my 11:05 pm post, right here) to ban Islam in the United States, based on it's violation of Article VI of the US Constitution (the Supremacy clause).

Roflmfao... Are you serious? Lmfao - you really don't understand where that leads, do you? Or maybe you do. Maybe banning Christians you don't agree with is next? And what of your precious Christian militias? Gonna ban those, too?

I can see why you admire Peter King.
 
Take the bet!!! He is Nicaraguan...but recently converted to Islam.

This is all lies and fabrications.

No Muslim has ever been involved in a Terrorist plot or act.

These attacks were carried out by White, Right Wing Terrorists to discredit Islam.

It is all propaganda and lies, and this thread belongs on the CT forum!

Islam, by Definition, is a Religion of Peace and Beauty... or had you momentarily forgotten.

Muslims, by Definition, are victims of Christian Agression... or had you momentarily forgotten.

-
 
Back
Top Bottom