• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Announces 'Framework' for Deal With Congress to Extend Bush-Era Tax Cuts

The entire argument from the left is illogical. For some reason the govt. has to fund tax cuts which allow people to keep more of what they earn but not fund unemployment payments that have just been expanded 13 months. You don't see a problem with that argument? People keeping more of what they earn = govt. expense? Expanding taxpayer payments to the unemployed good.

That's not just from the left. It appears that the right's leadership has agreed to this as well. :lol:

Studies have shown that unemployment benefits are more stimulative that tax cuts for the wealthy.
 
That's not just from the left. It appears that the right's leadership has agreed to this as well. :lol:

Studies have shown that unemployment benefits are more stimulative that tax cuts for the wealthy.

Unemployment creats jobs?
 
It makes perfect sense.

How many oilfield jobs has the government killed this year and how many prospective oilfield jobs has the government killed in the future with the drilling moratoiums? All that equates to tax revenue that won't be paid into the government. Does the old saying, "shooting yourself in the foot", ring a bell, right about now? Noticed the gas prices, lately? How are higher fuel prices good for the economy and therefore, by default, revenue generation?

How many layoffs has the tobacco industry experienced? There's a prime example of the government's regulations effecting the demand for a product. A know a guy that owns a cigar shop. He told me that roll-your-own cigarette tobacco went from $5 a bag, to $20 a bag. Demand is obviously going to go down; effecting the people that grow the tobacco, the people who produce the packages, the people who wholesale the tobacco and the people who retail the tobacco.

It boils down to this: don't kill jobs, then bitch because there's not enough tax revenue. Anyone that can't see a reduction in tax revenue, because of job killing governmental regulations, is far too stupid to hold public office.

I have to ask this. Do you own a gas station? :lol:

It's obvious why the deep water oil drilling moratorium was instilled.

As far as tobacco goes, they still make cigarettes. Also, pipe tobacco isn't taxed the same. I know a guy who rolls that up and smokes it for far cheaper.

Using your logic, they should legalize crack because that would create taxable jobs.
 
Unemployment creats jobs?

People spend that unemployment check directly into the economy. It doesn't sit in an investment portfolio. Without that check, there is less demand in the economy.
 
obama on THIS tax deal---"it's the right thing to do"

"it's the right thing to do for jobs, for the economy, for the middle class, for business"

he's still president, y'know

stay up

It's the ONLY thing he's done in office to promote private sector jobs and all he gets is grief from his base.
So much hatred for the rich, they are blind to the good for the country.
 
People spend that unemployment check directly into the economy. It doesn't sit in an investment portfolio. Without that check, there is less demand in the economy.

That spending directly into the economy is offset by the tax revenue it costs to fund those unemployment payments, the higher deficit and debt created. People keeping more of their own money do the same thing and have zero impact on the deficits and debt.

I believe you actually know that and simply are doing your best to create discussion and more posts. You are too smart to believe that people keeping more of their own money is an expense to the govt.
 
I have to ask this. Do you own a gas station? :lol:

It's obvious why the deep water oil drilling moratorium was instilled.

As far as tobacco goes, they still make cigarettes. Also, pipe tobacco isn't taxed the same. I know a guy who rolls that up and smokes it for far cheaper.

Using your logic, they should legalize crack because that would create taxable jobs.

So, in an ttempt to defend the Leftist agenda, you resort to the totally rediculous? Why is it so hard for Libbos to address the actual facts, vice resorting to the, "do you still beat your wife", angle?
 
People spend that unemployment check directly into the economy. It doesn't sit in an investment portfolio. Without that check, there is less demand in the economy.

So you take taxpayer money, give it to somebody to spend, so it can be taxed as income and revenue again, so you can give it back to the same person.........

It's insanity. It's like paying your Visa bill with your Mastercard.
 
People spend that unemployment check directly into the economy. It doesn't sit in an investment portfolio. Without that check, there is less demand in the economy.

So, you are claiming that unemployment creats jobs?

If that were true, the economy should have fully recovered, by now.
 
It's the ONLY thing he's done in office to promote private sector jobs and all he gets is grief from his base.
So much hatred for the rich, they are blind to the good for the country.

what about all the previous breaks for small business? don't those count?
 
what about all the previous breaks for small business? don't those count?

Which tax breaks would those be? I have a small business and don't recall any tax breaks.
 
what about all the previous breaks for small business? don't those count?

Satisfying the riches whims are what makes America so great, don't you know anything you dirty liberal/leftist/communist/socialist/marxist :2razz:
 
So you take taxpayer money, give it to somebody to spend, so it can be taxed as income and revenue again, so you can give it back to the same person.........

It's insanity. It's like paying your Visa bill with your Mastercard.

They haven't figured out that recycling money, doesn't work.
 
Satisfying the riches whims are what makes America so great, don't you know anything you dirty liberal/leftist/communist/socialist/marxist :2razz:

One would think that--with that attitude--you would be mad as hell about all the jobs that the Dems have killed.

That doesn't seem to be the case. Why not?
 
It will be great to see the final piece of legislation. I really hate to see unemployment payments extended whatever the number as 99 weeks are too much IMO. Heard tonight that there are 3.6 million job openings in the country today, almost the amount of the jobs lost in the last two years. Wonder how many of the chronically unemployed will apply?

I was wondering the same thing. Might have been better if people were still wondering if there was going to be an extention or not. (I know, I'm mean) Not everyone is just laying around collecting for as long as they can, but I know some personally who have done that in the past. It wasn't for 2 yrs though. Yikes!
 
That spending directly into the economy is offset by the tax revenue it costs to fund those unemployment payments, the higher deficit and debt created. People keeping more of their own money do the same thing and have zero impact on the deficits and debt.

I believe you actually know that and simply are doing your best to create discussion and more posts. You are too smart to believe that people keeping more of their own money is an expense to the govt.

The answer to budget shortfalls is not increasing the amount they are short by. That also increases the national debt and is less stimulative to the economy. Letting Hershey's keep more money does not automatically mean that people will buy more candy bars.
 
So, in an ttempt to defend the Leftist agenda, you resort to the totally rediculous? Why is it so hard for Libbos to address the actual facts, vice resorting to the, "do you still beat your wife", angle?

I'm sorry, did you post any undisputed facts?
 
Which tax breaks would those be? I have a small business and don't recall any tax breaks.

of course you don't.

President Obama Signs Small Business Jobs Act - Learn What's In It | The White House

Eight New Small Business Tax Cuts – Effective Today, Providing Immediate Incentives to Invest: The President had already signed into law eight small business tax cuts, and on Monday, he is signing into law another eight new tax cuts that go into effect immediately.
Zero Taxes on Capital Gains from Key Small Business Investments:Under the Recovery Act, 75 percent of capital gains on key small business investments this year were excluded from taxes. The Small Business Jobs Act temporarily puts in place for the rest of 2010 a provision called for by the President – elimination of all capital gains taxes on these investments if held for five years. Over one million small businesses are eligible to receive investments this year that, if held for five years or longer, could be completely excluded from any capital gains taxation.
Extension and Expansion of Small Businesses’ Ability to Immediately Expense Capital Investments: The bill increases for 2010 and 2011 the amount of investments that businesses would be eligible toimmediately write off to $500,000, while raising the level of investments at which the write-off phases out to $2 million. Prior to the passage of the bill, the expensing limit would have been $250,000 this year, and only $25,000 next year. This provision means that 4.5 million small businesses and individuals will be able to make new business investments today and know that they will earn a larger break on their taxes for this year.
Extension of 50% Bonus Depreciation:The bill extends – as the President proposed in his budget – a Recovery Act provision for 50 percent “bonus depreciation” through 2010, providing 2 million businesses, large and small, with the ability to make new investmentstoday and know they can receive a tax cut for this year by accelerating the rate at which they deduct capital expenditures.
A New Deduction of Health Insurance Costs for Self-Employed:The bill allows 2 million self-employed to know that on their taxes for this year, they can get a deduction for the cost of health insurance for themselves and their family members in calculating their self-employment taxes. This provision is estimated to provide over $1.9 billion in tax cuts for these entrepreneurs.
Tax Relief and Simplification for Cell Phone Deductions:The bill changes rules so that the use of cell phones can be deducted without burdensome extra documentation – making it easier for virtually every small business in America to receive deductions that they are entitled to, beginning on their taxes for this year.
An Increase in the Deduction for Entrepreneurs’ Start-Up Expenses:The bill temporarily increases the amount of start-up expenditures entrepreneurs can deductfrom their taxesfor this year from $5,000 to $10,000 (with a phase-out threshold of $60,000 in expenditures), offering an immediate incentive for someone with a new business idea to invest in starting up a new small business today.
A Five-Year Carryback Of General Business Credits:The bill would allow certain small businesses to “carry back” their general business credits to offset five years of taxes – providing them with a break on their taxes for this year – while also allowing these credits to offset the Alternative Minimum Tax, reducing taxes for these small businesses.
 
So, you are claiming that unemployment creats jobs?

If that were true, the economy should have fully recovered, by now.

It doesn't create jobs, it staves off the loss of more jobs.
 
What dodge? GWB gave the wealthy huge tax breaks and drove our country to economic disaster. Now Republicans think that continuing these same failed economic policies is what we need to do to rescue our economy? So.....how are you proposing that we fund continuing these Bush hand outs?

Things would have been much worse without the tax cuts. :)[/QUOTE]

Actually, things were much better before those tax cuts.
 
Satisfying the riches whims are what makes America so great, don't you know anything you dirty liberal/leftist/communist/socialist/marxist :2razz:

There's still time to form some reasonable opinions, Jet.

But stay on talking point if you must. Kill the rich! Kill the rich! Kill the rich!
 
There's still time to form some reasonable opinions, Jet.

But stay on talking point if you must. Kill the rich! Kill the rich! Kill the rich!

I see humour is wasted on you. Unsurprisingly.
 
There's still time to form some reasonable opinions, Jet.

But stay on talking point if you must. Kill the rich! Kill the rich! Kill the rich!


psssst it is "Eat the rich!"
 
Things would have been much worse without the tax cuts. :)

Actually, things were much better before those tax cuts.[/QUOTE]

And I suppose you liked those 18 percent interest rates on home loans in the early 80s, too?

Optimism spurned the 80s resurgence, not high taxes. Getting rid of Carter with a small-government platform gave business and investors reason to act; hence, the turnaround. Getting rid of trumped-up gasoline rationing helped. Showing the world we meant business (such as Iran) helped. Speaking openly of American exceptionalism helped.

As soon as we started putting the 60s liberals at bay, things started turning around.
 
Back
Top Bottom