"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos
I'm not even a liberal.
I'm just an American who understands how important our bill of rights is, and has maintained some rationality about this topic, rather than going unhinged.
I know that such subtleties are difficult for you to comprehend in your black/white world. Try.
Meanwhile, you go on the personal attacks every response, calling me stupid or lathering me with your "do you read what you post" or "erod's not up on his subjects" or whatever insults you can muster.
That's fine because that's 80 percent of what this forum is. A liberal version of the crips that likes to pounce in numbers.
And that's fine. I'm sitting in my big chair making money while I'm doing this. I put my hard time in long ago. And I've watched you guys muddle around in your misery for many years, and you always finish dead last. And I mean that as a general "you", not you specifically, Catz. I don't aim to insult you personally, as you obviously do me.
Your posts make it clear that you don't understand our laws, you don't understand the rights of foreign nationals, you don't understand the role of the first amendment in protecting the freedom of the press, and you don't understand the difference in role between the leaker (Private Benning) and the guy who published the leaks (Assange).Meanwhile, you go on the personal attacks every response, calling me stupid or lathering me with your "do you read what you post" or "erod's not up on his subjects" or whatever insults you can muster.
Furthermore, you entered this and other threads with a misguided goal of attacking Obama, attacking liberals generically, and basically raving like a partisan shill.
IF YOU ACT LIKE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE SUBJECT, AND YOUR POSTS ARE FULL OF PARTISAN RANTING THAT SHOWS YOU HAVE ZERO UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT AND ARE JUST BEATING A DRUM FOR ENTERTAINMENT VALUE, YOU SHOULD NOT GET PEEVISH WHEN PEOPLE POINT OUT THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
Your posts here are not thoughtful. They demonstrate zero grasp of the subject. You make amateurish mistakes and can't even remember (or demonstrate familiarity with) the key actors in this situation (Benning, Assange, etc.). You can't seem to distinguish between Wikileaks and unaffiliated/unorganized/uninvolved hackers who are attacking certain connected institutions. You don't show a basic familiarity with our laws and systems of governance.
If you want to be taken seriously, Erod, you have to spend at least a little time familiarizing yourself with the subject matter and posting in a thoughtful way.
Oh, poor Erod, being beaten verbally by forum gang members. Being held accountable for your words IS NOT BEING VICTIMIZED.That's fine because that's 80 percent of what this forum is. A liberal version of the crips that likes to pounce in numbers.
And you think I'm not? Lulz.And that's fine. I'm sitting in my big chair making money while I'm doing this.
Lulz at Catz..."Benning." The name is Manning. I hate it when I transpose people's names like that.
Wikileaks leaker angry over treatment of gays by military - National Law Enforcement | Examiner.com
Sorry, I just happen to think someone who exposures war crimes, corruption, and abuses of power is more deserving of recognition than those who simply kill the people their government says are bad.
I find this pitiful, your disdain for service members is noted.
Matthew 10:34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
I read all your crap, darling.