Yes, I believe it was.QUOTE Zyphlin
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that tax rate was higher for EVERYONE in the 1990's, not jus the rich?
No I’m not; where did you get that idea? See post #16.Are you suggesting the tax rate on the rich was the ONLY reason...if we're buying your premise that taxes alone were the only reason...for the prosperity?
See post #16.If not, why are you seemingly supporting only one portion of it being raised and not the other.
You built your slippery slope, have fun on your slide down it.Furthermore, correlation doesn't mean causation.
I ignored nothing.Its ridiculous to ignore every other factor of the 90's
That’s your take on what I posted. Here was the post I was responding to.that potentially played into the economic status of it and attempt to dishonestly melt it down to a single factor and act like that alone is a telling and absolute fact due to the 90's economy.
Now if there is anything else you want to take out of context let me know.“What rate do you think is the fair contribution from the those folks? Is 39% enough...? “