• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. nervously awaits next WikiLeaks

You ironically sound like a New Leftist.

If New Leftists get behind a small govt., balanced budgets, virtually no social welfare or entitlement payments, and neo-isolationism then fine. If they support Obamacare they gotta be discredited. If they support anything but the tiniest of federal governments then there will be unpleasantness. If New Leftists insist on an open border there will be no further need for a single America.
 
You do know it is illegal for US operatives and the US to assassinate people right? Ford kinda banned it...

You also know that in the same executive order, Ford made it illegal to leak classified information. Whatcha got to say about that part? Or, do you still consider illegally leaking classified docs as free speech?

BTW, the order says, "political assassination". It wouldn't be illegal to kill Assange.
 
If New Leftists get behind a small govt., balanced budgets, virtually no social welfare or entitlement payments, and neo-isolationism then fine. If they support Obamacare they gotta be discredited. If they support anything but the tiniest of federal governments then there will be unpleasantness. If New Leftists insist on an open border there will be no further need for a single America.

yeah....tell that to all the tea partiers who think THEIR SS and medicare should be untouched.
 
yeah....tell that to all the tea partiers who think THEIR SS and medicare should be untouched.

It's their money. So, IOW, if the government is going to make people pay into social security, with the promise that they can get it back when they reach a certain age, then by god, they should get it back.
 
It's their money. So, IOW, if the government is going to make people pay into social security, with the promise that they can get it back when they reach a certain age, then by god, they should get it back.

That's great in theory but the problem is that the government often spends that money on other stuff. Politicians only worry about being elected now, not what happens to the voters 30 years down the road.

I pay into the system but I'd be crazy to think that it would be there when its time to collect. If it's there great. If not then I'm ready. It's too important an impact on our lives to be left to the whims of politicians.

Why people trust politicians to do look after their health, their old age, their schooling, or even delivering a letter, knowing that they tend to lie and cheat, has always been something of a mystery to me.
 
That's great in theory but the problem is that the government often spends that money on other stuff. Politicians only worry about being elected now, not what happens to the voters 30 years down the road.

I pay into the system but I'd be crazy to think that it would be there when its time to collect. If it's there great. If not then I'm ready. It's too important an impact on our lives to be left to the whims of politicians.

Why people trust politicians to do look after their health, their old age, their schooling, or even delivering a letter, knowing that they tend to lie and cheat, has always been something of a mystery to me.

I agree, which is why it wouldn't bother me at all, if the government scrapped SS and I didn't have to take money out of my pocket to pay into it.
 
I agree, which is why it wouldn't bother me at all, if the government scrapped SS and I didn't have to take money out of my pocket to pay into it.

"I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul".
 
NY Times science writer refused to post the ClimateGate documents online, but the NYT has no problems posting US State Dept docs online. Does anyone else see what's wrong with this picture????
 
NY Times science writer refused to post the ClimateGate documents online, but the NYT has no problems posting US State Dept docs online. Does anyone else see what's wrong with this picture????

You say here that it was the science writer that refused to print the ClimateGate docs. Was the science writer also in charge of deciding if the US State Dept docs should be printed? If not then nope.
 
CBC News - Canada - U.S. nervously awaits next WikiLeaks

zimmer-albums-conservitoons-picture67113138-obama-wikileak.jpg


Legal Disclaimer

The above toon is an augmentation of a Steve Bell toon about The Great American President George W. Bush. It can be seen here: http://www.ccgb.org.uk/lobby/uploads/Cartoons/Bush_roll_for_un.jpg

If you have any problems with this augmented cartoon, please get some fresh air, drink a lot of water and consult your local psychiatrist immediately.

For complaints, please send them to:
Eric Holder
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001


.
 
Last edited:
Yes. It is an offensive and tasteless cartoon whichever president it lampoons.

It also has very little to do with this topic.
 
Yes. It is an offensive and tasteless cartoon whichever president it lampoons.

It also has very little to do with this topic.

It dovetails perfectly.

Thread title:
U.S. nervously awaits next WikiLeaks

.
 
It dovetails perfectly.

Thread title:
U.S. nervously awaits next WikiLeaks

.
That was an was extremely racist cartoon you posted. Why did you feel the need to post it?
 
The Wikileaks affair shows that Obama's America can't keep its affairs secret. American intelligence is a joke.
Scooter Libby showed the Bush administration couldn't keep it's affairs secret either. The Iraq War was a joke.
 
Scooter Libby showed the Bush administration couldn't keep it's affairs secret either. The Iraq War was a joke.

I don't care about Scooter Libby or George Bush or any stupid Republican. You misperceive my views.

You want to play tit for tat. That's ridiculous.

I'm just watching your country bleed out. That's a very different game. Why don't you take the seat next to me and we will watch together? It's a pretty amazing sight.
 
The Obama administration is feeding Wikileaks the information.
I think it's the CIA feeding Wikileaks the information and Wiki is coordinating with the media to publish it. Most of the information only seems to confirm what people already knew.

Shouldn't the media be held just as culpable as Wikileaks for publishing the information? After all, they are the ones who are cherry picking and verfifying what to publish.
 
I don't care about Scooter Libby or George Bush or any stupid Republican. You misperceive my views.

You want to play tit for tat. That's ridiculous.

I'm just watching your country bleed out. That's a very different game. Why don't you take the seat next to me and we will watch together? It's a pretty amazing sight.
You started the blame game and I finished it. Tit for tat.

I never claimed to be a mind reader and had no idea you weren't American. So why don't you say where you are from? Are you embarrassed?
 
Meh, I agree with you in general.
If it delivers Saudi records tho, I think I may just come from excitement.

I would hope from the bottom of my heart it is so controversial the data and hardlines take place over the Saudi Royals and if that was a side effect. I'd be cheering it on, believe me

Well then, here's some titalating information you might enjoy.

....The WikiLeaks cables report that Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah has implored President Obama to "cut off the head of the snake" — embarrassing for the king, perhaps, but no surprise to any of his subjects who have been paying attention. The cables also report the wry reaction of Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who insists that military action against Iran is a bad idea: The Saudis, he said, want to "fight the Iranians to the last American."
WikiLeaks, Iran and the U.S.: What the documents don't show - latimes.com

What the Wiki documents reveal is that one of the US's supposedly closet allies in the ME is funding the terrorists and at the same time goading the US to attack it's enemy Iran.....just like it did to it's other enemy, Iraq.

Even more revealing is the Obama administrations use of diplomacy and harsher sanctions is having more of an effect on Iran than threats of military action....
Iran Is in Weaker Position for Next Week's Talks on Its Nuclear Program

I think the Wikileaks may have helped bring Iran to the negotiating table with a much weaker hand. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if that was the main reason for the leaks. The rest of it just fodder for the National Enquirer.
 
You started the blame game and I finished it. Tit for tat.

I never claimed to be a mind reader and had no idea you weren't American. So why don't you say where you are from? Are you embarrassed?

I'm not going to stop the blame game. I am only too happy to join you in throwing Bush, Cheney and all of the other leftist shibboleths under the bus. They don't hold power any more.

Stupid Obama holds power. He's the target because he is the living breathing embodiment of leftist governance. He looks like a fool along with Hillary Clinton. This drum beat won't end no matter what happens to Bush.

There are many versions and visions of America. Some of them are compatible and some are hostile to each other. Each is legitimate, but they are under no obligation to each other.
 
I'm not going to stop the blame game. I am only too happy to join you in throwing Bush, Cheney and all of the other leftist shibboleths under the bus. They don't hold power any more.

Stupid Obama holds power. He's the target because he is the living breathing embodiment of leftist governance. He looks like a fool along with Hillary Clinton. This drum beat won't end no matter what happens to Bush.

There are many versions and visions of America. Some of them are compatible and some are hostile to each other. Each is legitimate, but they are under no obligation to each other.
You must be very ashamed of your country not to say where you are from.
 
Back
Top Bottom