Page 33 of 53 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 529

Thread: North Korea reportedly fires at South

  1. #321
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    08-14-12 @ 11:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    3,928

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by liblady View Post
    wth is wrong with NK? i think this calls for serious action.
    Wait wait wait.....we've been down this road with liberals before. The last time we passed a resolution involving "serious consequences" against Saddam, you didn't support a war. So what is "serious action" to you liberals this time? Inquiring minds want to know.

  2. #322
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:04 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,255

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by liblady View Post
    wth is wrong with NK? i think this calls for serious action.

    Ve are verry seerious.




    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  3. #323
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by dontworrybehappy View Post
    Wait wait wait.....we've been down this road with liberals before. The last time we passed a resolution involving "serious consequences" against Saddam, you didn't support a war. So what is "serious action" to you liberals this time? Inquiring minds want to know.
    Ok Inquiring minds,more than likely we will conduct military exercises with the South and Secretary of State Hillary most likely is on the horn with China as we speak.The end results will more than likely be the same as the last time...we will feed them.

    Now lets here your take on it....to the liberals that you say "we've been down this road with liberals before "to. Oh, by the way, show where this thorn in Americas a** has been only a liberal problem.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  4. #324
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Seen
    08-14-12 @ 11:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    3,928

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by donc View Post
    Ok Inquiring minds,more than likely we will conduct military exercises with the South and Secretary of State Hillary most likely is on the horn with China as we speak.The end results will more than likely be the same as the last time...we will feed them.

    Now lets here your take on it....to the liberals that you say "we've been down this road with liberals before "to. Oh, by the way, show where this thorn in Americas a** has been only a liberal problem.
    Quit trying to create strawmen don. I asked her what "serious consequences" meant since the last time liberals used that phrase they didn't really mean anything SERIOUS, just more cheap talk. So I wanted to get clarification. Does she mean a full invasion of NK? Ousting KJI? A military buildup in the area? Strategic strikes against NK's nuclear capability?

    I was asking her, not you. But thanks for playing.
    Last edited by dontworrybehappy; 11-26-10 at 02:55 PM.

  5. #325
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:04 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,255

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by donc View Post
    Ok Inquiring minds,more than likely we will conduct military exercises with the South and Secretary of State Hillary most likely is on the horn with China as we speak.The end results will more than likely be the same as the last time...we will feed them.

    Now lets here your take on it....to the liberals that you say "we've been down this road with liberals before "to. Oh, by the way, show where this thorn in Americas a** has been only a liberal problem.
    I think we should send our secret weapon over to China.......Hillary!

    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  6. #326
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Undisclosed
    Last Seen
    03-18-13 @ 02:59 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,544

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    North Korea is not the enemy.

    In the entire world my only enemy is American Leftism. Anything that weakens it is good.

    North Korea shows Obama as weak and feckless. Obama is the living, breathing embodiment of American Leftism. North Korea is solely a problem of the American Left because the Left is in charge.

    Foreign adversaries can be used for domestic political purposes. Do you remember Michael Moore and the Second Iraq War? What's
    good for the goose is good for the gander.

  7. #327
    Sage

    Donc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    out yonder
    Last Seen
    12-06-17 @ 09:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    9,426

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    QUOTE dontworrybehappy

    Quit trying to create strawmen don.
    Where is the strawman?The only strawman I see is the two you built.

    The first one enters with the first sentence in your post.(Wait wait wait.....we've been down this road with liberals before)the strawman in this example is the dreaded LIBRAL.

    Not satisfied with one, you create a second one and name him... SADAM.(The last time we passed a resolution involving "serious consequences" against Saddam, you didn't support a war.)

    now lets see what constitutes a straw man fallacy.


    A straw man fallacy is criticizing, distorting, exaggerating or misrepresenting an argument or claim after you build a convenient strawman that you can knock down with ease.

    You have built two boogiemen that wingers have been using for years. Classic strawmen,liberals and Sadam.And started a war using the later.


    I asked her what "serious consequences" meant since the last time liberals used that phrase they didn't really mean anything SERIOUS, just more cheap talk. So I wanted to get clarification. Does she mean a full invasion of NK? Ousting KJI? A military buildup in the area? Strategic strikes against NK's nuclear capability?
    Yet you skip right over post#320 by Enigma001, who her question was directed at, who answers her question.Amazing.


    Which leads us into this sentence.



    I was asking her, not you. But thanks for playing.
    Yet you responded to her post to EnigmaO01 in post #310. thanks for the attempt at playing.
    The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say

  8. #328
    Meh...
    MSgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    17,979

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Di Salvo View Post
    North Korea is not the enemy.

    In the entire world my only enemy is American Leftism. Anything that weakens it is good.

    North Korea shows Obama as weak and feckless. Obama is the living, breathing embodiment of American Leftism. North Korea is solely a problem of the American Left because the Left is in charge.

    Foreign adversaries can be used for domestic political purposes. Do you remember Michael Moore and the Second Iraq War? What's
    good for the goose is good for the gander.
    I agree that the American Left, in its haste to realize the dream of utopia and rainbows, unwittingly weakens the nation, but let's not go too far with it. North Korea behaved badly under President Bush as well.

    The lesson to take away from this is that once these nations go nuke, they have a license to bully anyone they like. The Global Left (which is entirely different from the American Left and are mercilessly decrepit in their morality) would have the world believe that if we just give everybody nukes, then the universal system of MADD will prevail and lead us into a new peaceful era of mankind. Of course, this same lot also wishes to pretend that every nation on earth is rational and without religious motivations to see certain events unfold. Of course, this is about North Korea, which is a nation merely acting poorly without any sense of purpose to create a thriving society for its people. Imagine if "God" was on their side (to a greater degree, I mean.)

    It doesn't matter what Party sits in the White House. Nuclear capability gives a nation the right to behave however they like. The goal should be to deny those nations too untrustworthy to weild the power. Because as North Korea has proven, a strongly worded letter of condemnation is all the most powerful nation in history is left with.

    MSgt
    Semper Fidelis
    USMC

  9. #329
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,026

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Di Salvo View Post
    North Korea is not the enemy.
    No it's a benign peaceful loving nirvana of a nation where everybody wears love beads and sings Kumbya. Never killed anyone. It's all lies lies, lies! They love us and all outsiders! For the love of God what planet do you live on?

    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Di Salvo View Post
    In the entire world my only enemy is American Leftism. Anything that weakens it is good.
    Newsflash: It's not the left that sabre rattles and gets us into needless wars. It's the right. Where have you been the last two decades? Under a rock?

    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Di Salvo View Post
    North Korea shows Obama as weak and feckless. Obama is the living, breathing embodiment of American Leftism. North Korea is solely a problem of the American Left because the Left is in charge.
    Riiiiiiight. No other president had ever had a problem with NK going back to 1953. It all started when "weak" Obama took office. Dude you're killing me here with your revisionist history. Do you really believe this or have you got some kind of axe to grind? I think it's the latter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Di Salvo View Post
    Foreign adversaries can be used for domestic political purposes. Do you remember Michael Moore and the Second Iraq War? What's
    good for the goose is good for the gander.
    Just ask George Bush and Dick Cheney about creating boogiemen for starting wars. They are experts at it. Michael Moore has never advocated war. What in the hell are you talking about?
    Last edited by EnigmaO01; 11-26-10 at 04:45 PM.

  10. #330
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,026

    Re: North Korea reportedly fires at South

    Quote Originally Posted by MSgt View Post
    North Korea behaved badly under President Bush as well.
    Don't stop there. They behaved badly under Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, Carter etc. etc. Anyone remember the Pueblo? Hell that was during Johnson's presidency!
    Last edited by EnigmaO01; 11-26-10 at 04:42 PM.

Page 33 of 53 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •