Yay!!! More none news!!!!
Yay!!! More none news!!!!
there are a rapidly decreasing few who still try to defend him because they agree with his ideals
but all recognize he's inept
at the g20, in addition to the humiliation you recall, he was universally rejected, rebuffed, disrespected and sent home empty handed, according to the nyt, reuters, wsj, ap, the national journal
i could post a half dozen links (already have)
he went into that summit trying to cobble an international consensus against china's crass currency manipulation
but he departed for asia exactly 3 days after ben bernanke announced another 600B of qe, completely undermining the keystone economist's credibility
the international community was furious with him
and he couldn't forsee it
his amateurishness is truly stunning
seoul really was a rodney dangerfield moment for the tone deaf dummy
no one seriously denies it
when he went to china in november, 2009, no less an authority than leslie gelb (council on foreign relations) called it: AMATEUR HOUR AT THE WHITE HOUSE
Amateur Hour at the White House - Council on Foreign Relations
he was rudely rebuffed on that excursion on questions as disparate as currency, iranian sanctions, global warming, human rights and tibet
bonehead obama in the machiavellian presence of chairmen hu is like shirley temple meets vyachislov molotov
der spiegel's take on the same tryst---NICE GUY ACT GETS OBAMA NOWHERE ON WORLD STAGE
US Foreign Policy: Obama's Nice Guy Act Gets Him Nowhere on the World Stage - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
upshot---recognition, acknowledgement of the president's incompetence is not new
and don't forget one month later it was china's uncooperativeness that killed climate accords in cold, cold copenhagen
Low targets, goals dropped: Copenhagen ends in failure | Environment | guardian.co.uk
obama is overtly over his head
If you want to accuse someone of something, in this case you have to accuse the Secret Service. They will not let the President ride around in any random vehicle.
Of course, if Obama had ordered the Secret Service to supply him with a low-emission vehicle, and they spent the $500,000 it would cost to acquire a vehicle that met the security standards required of such a vehicle, conservatives would no doubt complain about the expenditure (after they falsely claimed that it cost 40 times more than it actually cost).
I went so far as to help you out by putting two very important words in bold for you. It's not that Obama wants to use a fuel inefficient vehicle, it's that security requires that he does so.Security dictates that Obama travel in the no-efficiency 'Beast,' a vehicle that fascinates the local press.
I think you all on the right should go back to whining a bout birth certificates, Michelle's shoes, and teleprompters and other such important issues.
Conservatives believe the government is incompetent, and seek to elect people who will prove it
Ignorance is Bliss Bliss is the same as happiness US Christian conservatives are the happiest in the US according to studies Do you see a connection?
let's not forget nyt: obama's economic views rejected on world stage
globe: g20 refuses to back us push on chinese currency
natl journal: obama's rodney dangerfield moment
cfr: amateur hour at the white house
der spiegel: nice guy act gets him nowhere on world stage
guardian: copenhagen ends in failure
are they all righties, are they whining?
or could it possibly be they're telling the truth?
who needs to wake up?