• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Democrats in disarray over expiring tax cuts

nonsense... they are nowhere NEAR as honset and truthful as this site...

Liberapedia

LiberalPedia on George Bush

George Walker Bush is proof that humans and apes are related and the Former President. He became President of the United States in 2000 after the Supreme Court overruled the Florida Supreme Court and stopped a vote recount, thus allowing the Republican Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris to hand the election to Bush. That's democracy folks. After a dirty campaign in 2004, Bush was elected to a second term as President. Bush was given the nickname of Dubya
by the press, due to his middle initial "W" but also possibly because he is unable to spell "George".

Dubya's most controversial speech during his campaign in 2004.
Added by ThaMarine
The Americans have finally seen through Bush and chose Barack Obama to succeed him.

Conservapedia on George Bush

George Walker Bush (born New Haven, Connecticut 1946) was the Governor of Texas (1995-2000) and served as the 43rd President of the United States of America from 2001 to 2009. Campaigning on the notion that the United States should not be in the business of nation-building[1] and promising "to restore honor and dignity" to the office of the President,[2] he won the office by a narrow margin in the decisive State of Florida in the 2000 Presidential election. Legal challenges to the certified vote count went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court when liberal Democratic contender Al Gore contested the outcome for weeks until the Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore.
In the 2004 Presidential election Bush won re-election, helped in part by a 300,000 vote victory (5%) in the State of Florida, where the outcome had been so close in 2000.[3] Leftist Democratic candidate John Kerry conceded defeat the day after the election.

Bush's presidency was defined by foreign policy because of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, which eventually resulted in the liberation of the countries of Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush named two conservatives to the Supreme Court. He reformed K12 education with a major new program, No Child Left Behind, and pushed a series of major tax cuts through Congress. Conservatives cheered. All this happened in his first term, aiding his easy reelection. His performance in dealing with Hurricane Katrina in 2005 were widely ridiculed, though some Republicans argued that local Democrats did an even worse job.
As the Financial Crisis of 2008 smashed into the banking system and the nation plunged into the Recession of 2008, Bush responded with a massive aid program of $700 billion to banks, and loan guarantees amounting to the trillions of dollars. Conservatives were dismayed, and he left office with the economy spiraling downward. Above all, he made the most dramatic federal interventions in American history by his rescues of the financial system and the automobile industry in 2008. Bruce Bartlett, a Republican economist, says, "Bush clearly is not a Reaganite or "small 'c' conservative."

Conservatives and libertarians have criticized Bush for greatly increased domestic spending, creating a new entitlement program for prescription drugs, failing to veto a single bill, and expanding both the size and scope of government. The man made extremely difficult decisions under extraordinary circumstances. Unlike any president before him, he was subjected to an all out attack by liberal aligned groups intent on playing politics, while forcing him to admit defeat in Iraq. Bush's last year in office was a combination of Democrat Alinsky tactics and abandonment by his own Republican party. Lobbyists and Congress contributed greatly to the collapsing financial markets. Mistakes, questionable interests, Federal Reserve lack of transparency, Liberal Media, Unions, Homeland Security and you understand why the Bush team was to falter, they were in over their heads. Bush is a man with convictions that didn't cower from protecting America and putting America first. [4] George would engineer two government rebate checks, giving back to the people. Average unemployment over eight-years of the Bush Administration was 5.3%. [5] and he can be credited for having the most pro-life policies of any president.

Liberalpedia on Obama

Barack Obama is the current President of the United States. He was the junior United States Senator from Illinois from 2005 until 2008. He is working to end has ended the war in Iraq, which George W. Bush didn't manage.
Obama is a man who knows what it's like to overcome racism and rise up to become the president of the United States. He is a man who has united the entire Democratic party, and who aims to unite the nation. Obama has already succeeded against the odds. He has shown the world that you don't have to be white to lead a diverse Western nation. Obama is a realist and knows that he can only hope to unite most of the nation. He will have to settle for isolating rubbish like Conservapedia, Metapedia and the KKK.

He has been frequently opposed by born-again pro-family politicians who are horrified that his welfare policies may actually make them pay to improve living conditions for low-income families. Obama has also pledged to tax the rich and help the middle class and the poor. That has already put rich Neocons against him.

Conservapedia on Obama

Barack Hussein Obama II (aka Barry Soetoro,[1][2][3] said to have been born in Honolulu August 4, 1961[4][5][6][7][8]) is the 44th President of the United States, and the first President who is biracial. He has been associated with numerous fringe radical groups and causes[9] and served less than four years as a first-term Democratic Senator from Illinois (2005-2008). In a highly controversial decision, after what critics dubbed the "world apology tour," Obama was the recipient of the 2009 Nobel Peace prize.

The United States has recorded the highest deficits as a share of GDP since 1945 in Obama's first two years;[10][11] correspondingly, poverty[12] and unemployment have increased markedly to record levels not seen in more than 50 years.[13] One half million workers per week continued to lose their jobs well into the "Recovery Summer". The Unemployment Rate has stagnated in the 10% range [14] with tens of millions more affected by Underemployment, long term disaffection, and loss of hope of finding a employment.[15] Obama's signature legislative achievement, ObamaCare, is cited as a major cause of unemployment,[16] a drag on job creation,[17] and risk of a Greek-style debt crisis.[18][19] Despite advice from his own economic advisers,[20] Obama has promised tax increases to take affect January 1, 2011, in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.
While 'turning the page' on the War on Terror the rate of terrorist attacks in the United States has gone from zero under President George W. Bush's[21] to at least four per year[22][23][24][25][26] and the Bipartisan Policy Center's National Security Preparedness Group reports Al-Qaeda leadership has become increasingly homegrown and ‘Americanized’ under U.S-based Islamic radicals.[27]

President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico[28] and was criticized by the Gulf Oil Spill investigatory commission for his lack of competence and misuse of data to mislead the public[29] about the "worst environmental disaster in US history."[30][31] Obama declared,

“ oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills. They are technologically very advanced."[32][33][34] ”

Charles Chaput, the Catholic Archbishop of Denver, the city where Obama was nominated for president, criticized Obama as the "most committed" abortion-supporting candidate "since the Roe v. Wade abortion decision in 1973."[35] Obama said "the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act."[36] It "would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again."[37]

****ing Hilarious I'm sure you'll agree
 
Dems unmoved by W.H. statement | POLITICO 44

The White House isn’t overly impressed with Nancy Pelosi’s rapid passage of a measure permanently extending tax cuts only for middle-class earners – or by reports that a deal with the GOP on the cuts is imminent.

In a statement seemingly intended to douse the entire Hill in cold water, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs faintly praised Democrats’ passage of the extension for families making $250,000: “The President continues to believe that extending middle class tax cuts is the most important thing we can do for our economy right now and he applauds the House for passing a permanent extension.”

He quickly added: “But, because Republicans have made it clear that they won’t pass a middle class extension without also extending tax cuts for the wealthy, the President has asked Director Lew and Secretary Geithner to work with Congress to find a way forward. Those discussions started just yesterday and are continuing this afternoon.”

Hill Democrats were unimpressed and said Gibbs’s statement only served to reinforce their fear that the administration had already given up the idea of challenging the GOP to vote for the middle-class cuts – or let all of them expire by the end of the year.

But if a deal is really in the offing, Gibbs warned that it would come later rather than sooner.

“The talks are ongoing and productive, but any reports that we are near a deal in the tax cuts negotiations are inaccurate and premature,” he said.

worst of both worlds---on record for TAX HIKES (in times like these) with ZERO chance of ultimate realization

all the political pain, no gain

why are geithner and lew NEGOTIATING, nancy?

and, mr gibbs, later rather than sooner?

taxes go up on middle earners by about $4000 per year in only THREE WEEKS unless house AND senate pass some IDENTICAL measure---AND the president must sign it

plaudits, ms p!

LOL!
 
Reid sets tax cut vote as talks continue - Carrie Budoff Brown and Glenn Thrush and Manu Raju - POLITICO.com

The decision to schedule a vote reflects a growing frustration among Democrats as they try to keep the administration from negotiating away their must-do list of legislative initiatives. In repeated meetings this week, White House officials made it clear to Senate Democrats they were willing to accept temporary extensions of the tax cuts for all income groups rather than risk the defeat of the START treaty, according to two Senate staffers familiar with the talks.

But Senate Democrats have expressed concern about whether they would get enough in return for agreeing to a temporary tax cut extension, which many would view as a cave-in on the first major test for Democrats after a midterm election drubbing. "Democrats have been blasting the Bush tax cuts for 10 years. We aren't going to pass up a chance to vote our conscience on them because the White House has decided to negotiate it away for an extension of Ronald Reagan's START treaty," said a Senate Democratic staffer close to the talks.

Senate Democrats emerged from a nearly three-hour caucus meeting Thursday as divided as when they started, with no clear endgame for resolving the partisan standoff over tax cuts. "People were all over the map here," one Democratic senator said. "A lot of very strong opinions were expressed."

The meeting focused exclusively on tax cuts, and a number of senators expressed serious frustration at the willingness of the White House to cave in on a two-year tax cut extension that's unpaid for, saying it was unfair that benefits for the jobless had to be offset but not tax cuts for the wealthy. But others said that their colleagues needed to accept the political reality that the cuts would be extended temporarily — and that the caucus needed to structure the votes so it can get the best political deal possible.

the members are also pissed at leadership's abject SURRENDER on dream and DON'T ASK DON'T TELL

are you sure these people know what they're doing?

party on, progressives, be proud!
 
Last edited:
Obama has not folded on anything, he has locked out the GOP and rammed his agenda forward. He no longer can do that since he lost his senate fillibuster proof majority and the house.

He has folded on most things: 1) the healthcare legislation was so watered-down, its almost meaningless; 2) the financial reform legislation is weak, 3) the stimulus was 1/2 the size it should have been with far too much (1/3) in tax cuts, which are generally less effective of a stimulus than spending.... and, it contained far too much pork without real targeting of the spending and 4) the fact that the "bush tax cuts is still an open issue is beyond belief given the majority of americans are opposed to extending the credits on the upper incomes and he has a majority in the congress.

I think the Dems have the real ideas; but are the clearly the weaker half..... the party of wimps gives way to the party of fools.
 
He has folded on most things: 1) the healthcare legislation was so watered-down, its almost meaningless; 2) the financial reform legislation is weak, 3) the stimulus was 1/2 the size it should have been with far too much (1/3) in tax cuts, which are generally less effective of a stimulus than spending.... and, it contained far too much pork without real targeting of the spending and 4) the fact that the "bush tax cuts is still an open issue is beyond belief given the majority of americans are opposed to extending the credits on the upper incomes and he has a majority in the congress.

I think the Dems have the real ideas; but are the clearly the weaker half..... the party of wimps gives way to the party of fools.

Shoosh! Don't bring facts into this. They hurt my eyes because I rarely see them, it's like gold.
 
well, one thing is clear

the party of whimps is giving way to the american people

it happened on tsunami tuesday

perhaps you saw the headlines
 
Had the same problem with the last preseident, and the one before him and the one before him and the one before him. This debt didn't just start under Obama.

Bush and the republican party spent too much money. This administration has just about matched them in only too years. It makes little sense to complain about republicans spending too much money and then elect a democratic administration that spends even more even faster, professor.
 
Bush and the republican party spent too much money. This administration has just about matched them in only too years. It makes little sense to complain about republicans spending too much money and then elect a democratic administration that spends even more even faster, professor.

Not sure that is factually true, but even if it were, that still only means a continuation of the problem and not a new problem. yet, the reaction has been like it was new and only Obama. I find that odd.
 
Not sure that is factually true, but even if it were, that still only means a continuation of the problem and not a new problem. yet, the reaction has been like it was new and only Obama. I find that odd.

You haven't been paying attention, professor. I've been telling you for years I voted for the republicans if only because I saw them as the lesser of two evils, the democratic party being the worse of two evils. Apparently, I wasn't alone.

The tea party are a group of individuals that are involved in a hostile takeover of the republican party. They want the party to return to it's roots as a party of fiscal responsibility and smaller government. I guess you could call me a tea partier too as that's what I want. I have no idea if the movement will be successful. The odds and the leadership of the republican party are against it.

The election of mr obama and the last two years of thier legislative agenda have simply been too much for too many of us, the last straw if you will.

You are a left of center man. I'm a right of center man. If there is something you don't understand about conservatives......just ask. I'll stear you right. ;)
 
You haven't been paying attention, professor. I've been telling you for years I voted for the republicans if only because I saw them as the lesser of two evils, the democratic party being the worse of two evils. Apparently, I wasn't alone.

The tea party are a group of individuals that are involved in a hostile takeover of the republican party. They want the party to return to it's roots as a party of fiscal responsibility and smaller government. I guess you could call me a tea partier too as that's what I want. I have no idea if the movement will be successful. The odds and the leadership of the republican party are against it.

The election of mr obama and the last two years of thier legislative agenda have simply been too much for too many of us, the last straw if you will.

You are a left of center man. I'm a right of center man. If there is something you don't understand about conservatives......just ask. I'll stear you right. ;)

The tea party on the whole is even more disconnected than anyone else. So, I'm not too impressed by them. And as Obama has done too little, I doubt very seriously it is really actions by Obama that is the major factor in this incoherent anger we see today.
 
The tea party on the whole is even more disconnected than anyone else. So, I'm not too impressed by them. And as Obama has done too little, I doubt very seriously it is really actions by Obama that is the major factor in this incoherent anger we see today.

The tea partiers are disconnected from......whom? Mr obama has done too little for........whom?

Professor, you insist on looking at the present political situation from the perspective of whom you are. The tea partiers are the base of the republican party. Whatever the republican leadership does they will have to tread lightly here. If they continue to disappoint, they will lose their base. That makes the tea partiers pretty "connected."

In regards to mr obama, he has done far too much......from the perspective of the conservatives of this country. I might also add he's done far too much for the majority of those who consider themselves independents.

For an educated man you have always been strangely myoptic. I don't mean that as a perjorative. It's just something I've always wondered about.
 
The tea partiers are disconnected from......whom? Mr obama has done too little for........whom?

Professor, you insist on looking at the present political situation from the perspective of whom you are. The tea partiers are the base of the republican party. Whatever the republican leadership does they will have to tread lightly here. If they continue to disappoint, they will lose their base. That makes the tea partiers pretty "connected."

In regards to mr obama, he has done far too much......from the perspective of the conservatives of this country. I might also add he's done far too much for the majority of those who consider themselves independents.

For an educated man you have always been strangely myoptic. I don't mean that as a perjorative. It's just something I've always wondered about.

From reality. Tea partiers on the whole are incoherent and lack actual knowledge on a variety of subjects, including the what the Consititution actually says.

Obama has done very little. His health care reform was too waterded down by compromise. Exit polling showed (I linked that in another thread) that 1/3 thought he did too much with healthcare reform. 1/3 the right amount, and 1/3 too little. Hard to factually argue he was against the people based on those numbers.

Not sure what you mean by the myopic comment. I see the big picture, see the long run, and am not narrowminded. However, I am near sighted. :coffeepap
 
Bush and the republican party spent too much money. This administration has just about matched them in only too years. It makes little sense to complain about republicans spending too much money and then elect a democratic administration that spends even more even faster, professor.

Not sure that is factually true

National Debt Up $3 Trillion on Obama's Watch - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

The Debt increased $4.9 trillion during President Bush's two terms. The Administration has projected the National Debt will soar in Mr. Obama's fourth year in office to nearly $16.5-trillion in 2012. That's more than 100 percent of the value of the nation's economy and $5.9-trillion above what it was his first day on the job.

4.9T in 8 years vs 5.9 in 4, according to the white house
 
Last edited:
from the nyt, via cnbc:

News Headlines

interest on the debt alone to approach a tril per year by 2019
 
The point is the money is not the governments. Taxes is not what the government deserves but is the government taking what others have earned. Tax cuts do not cost the government money it allows people to keep their own money. What causes the debt is the government not living with in its means the way the rest of us have to. The government needs to realize that tax money is not a right and they need to realize that people should get to keep more of what they work hard to make.
 
Lord, you guys do sucker easliy for hyperbole. There's no socialism let alone communism here.

But once you accept the republican plan of mandating health care over a public option, you had to deal with the insurance companies. You can't do away with pre-existing condition, cover all children without either the government providing a plan or mandating insurance. The public has a real disconnect here.
Milton Friedman called it a Commi System and a Socialist-Communist system (covering both bases for the illiterate) before ObamaKare... I know you won't take this Nobel Laureate's word, but we know you're a socialist loving defender... capable of dismissing fact like all good socialist soldiers do... so what else is new under the sun? Ten Hut Komrade!
LA: Is there an area here in the United States in which we have not been as aggressive as we should in promoting property rights and free markets?

MF: Yes, in the field of medical care. We have a socialist-communist system of distributing medical care. Instead of letting people hire their own physicians and pay them, no one pays his or her own medical bills. Instead, there's a third party payment system. It is a communist system and it has a communist result.

http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2006&month=07

.
 
Last edited:
Milton Friedman called it a Commi System and a Socialist-Communist system (covering both bases for the illiterate) before ObamaKare... I know you won't take this Nobel Laureate's word, but we know you're a socialist loving defender... capable of dismissing fact like all good socialist soldiers do... so what else is new under the sun? Ten Hut Komrade!


.

energizer-bunny.jpg


The energizer bunny of the Hyperpartisan right everybody!
 
The energizer bunny of the Hyperpartisan right everybody!

You know the socialists are defeated when their best defense is to strike against the poster, and say nothing about the subject at hand.

As you oppose me at every turn, are you a Hyperpartisan socialist? Nah... you're merely a motivated socialist... this "Hyperpartisan" BS is just that... BS. If someone believes in something and is capable of defending and promoting it vigorously... and the opponent cannot defend against it, the mental midgets bring out the "Hyperpartisan" label.

Better keep that wabbit, Obama and the Dems will need all of them they can get their hands on, as they party is running out of them.

.
 
Last edited:
bump because i love reading the title of this thread.
 
Milton Friedman called it a Commi System and a Socialist-Communist system (covering both bases for the illiterate) before ObamaKare... I know you won't take this Nobel Laureate's word, but we know you're a socialist loving defender... capable of dismissing fact like all good socialist soldiers do... so what else is new under the sun? Ten Hut Komrade!


.

No, not being a mindless sheep, I won't take someone's word. Why do you?
 
No, not being a mindless sheep, I won't take someone's word. Why do you?


What? You won't take someone's word? Ofcourse you do.....It happens to be Keith Olberman's, or his nephew Rachel Maddow's but you do.

j-mac
 
What? You won't take someone's word? Ofcourse you do.....It happens to be Keith Olberman's, or his nephew Rachel Maddow's but you do.

j-mac

J, that's just in your imagination. Seriously. Drugs are bad OK . . .

:coffeepap
 
J, that's just in your imagination. Seriously. Drugs are bad OK . . .

:coffeepap


Nah, but we all tell ourselves what we would like....Oh, my profession doesn't lend to drug use like yours does...


j-mac
 
Back
Top Bottom