Bailing out unions? good grief , get a damn clue already, i've already explained this to you, you were comfy just letting the economy totally collapse because it would have served your purposes, to have an all republican government, never mind all the people, OTHER THAN THOSE 'UNION' JOBS you like to cry about, who would have been out of work because those companys, members of the 'big three' went belly up. UNION JOBS would not have been the only jobs lost, a fact you can't, don't, don't want to, grasp. If it hurt the democrats, hurt the unions, then apparently everyone else be damned who would have been hurt by the fallout.
extended unemployment benefits? YOU YOURSELF LIKE TO BANG THE DRUM ABOUT HOW MANY 'MILLIONS' OF PEOPLE ARE UNEMPLOYED, but claim that, apparently, all these unemployed people are lazy bums, wanting to live off the government teat, and are all happy servants of the democratic party. so explain something to me....you don't see any need for unemployment benefits for these people? how do you expect them to eat? pay their rent? have gas money to look for a job? what do you expect these people to do? i've read some of your posts that say perhaps they need to move...hey genius, where are they supposed to get the money to move on?