- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,433
- Reaction score
- 35,283
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
the aclu, like house homeland security, is cited by the serious as SIGNAL
ie, indication of the lay of the land
hello
So when they said the exact same thing in 2004:
Even those who pass successfully though metal detectors and appear unsuspicious may be subject to an intrusive pat-down in sensitive body areas, including breasts, genitals, and buttocks.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) began allowing full-body frisks when it revamped its screening tests on Sept. 22 to ensure passenger safety. Since then, about a dozen complaints are filed each week regarding screening misconduct, many from women who feel they were groped.
Were you saying the ACLU was sending a SIGNAL to the seriouness of the problem then too?