• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

Boo Radley said:
So, asking for someone to make the point without exaggeration is a shuffle? You have real funny ideas and views Rev. You really do. :lamo :lamo :lamo
Click to expand...


Do the watusi.....


images
 
Boo Radley said:
Never said that. Reading comprehension is a valuable tool. You're making major leaps here. Major leaps.
Click to expand...


same damn thing. you are calling the claims, "exagerations", you doubt the ACLU's claims without any evidence blaming the victims as mere dupes.


You blame the victims boo...



Do the twist:



11a5b2a5d6a304e9e42acd5b9fa955ad2e04f63f.jpg
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
same damn thing. you are calling the claims, "exagerations", you doubt the ACLU's claims without any evidence blaming the victims as mere dupes.


You blame the victims boo...
Click to expand...

No one says anyone is a victim. There has to be a victim to blame the victim. I am saying molestation, fondling, groping didn't happen. Again, reading comprehension is an essential skill.
 
I don't trust the ACLU, but when they criticize a leftwing administration....I'm going to notice.
 
American said:
I don't trust the ACLU, but when they criticize a leftwing administration....I'm going to notice.
Click to expand...

Why? They do that often. It's their job to push everyone. And they often exaggerate to do this. And I say this as a supporter.

But I am curious stil as to why you can't make the point without the exaggeration?
 
Boo Radley said:
No one says anyone is a victim. There has to be a victim to blame the victim. I am saying molestation, fondling, groping didn't happen. Again, reading comprehension is an essential skill.
Click to expand...


So these 900 or so folks who claim it has, are all lying?


So are most rape victims eh boo? :roll:


TonyWaagDanceShotsm.jpg
 
Boo Radley said:
Why? They do that often. It's their job to push everyone. And they often exaggerate to do this. And I say this as a supporter.

But I am curious stil as to why you can't make the point without the exaggeration?
Click to expand...


So what if it's half true?
 
Boo Radley said:
Why? They do that often. It's their job to push everyone. And they often exaggerate to do this. And I say this as a supporter.

But I am curious stil as to why you can't make the point without the exaggeration?
Click to expand...

Why don't you comment on the bomb-sniffing dogs?
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So these 900 or so folks who claim it has, are all lying?
Click to expand...

More wrong, exaggerating, not understanding what fondling, groping and moslestation really are. they didn't like it, so they exaggerated. But we have objective definitions and don't have to respond emotionally. We can look at the defintion, look at what they are doing and know that it isn't any of those things, even if we're against it being done.

And you don't help your position by continuing to exaggerate and misrerpresent.
 
American said:
Why don't you comment on the bomb-sniffing dogs?
Click to expand...

I have no trouble with them. So, there's not much need to comment. But I do have trouble with exaggeration. And I still would like an answer to my question. I think it is a fair question.
 
Boo Radley said:
More wrong, exaggerating, not understanding what fondling, groping and moslestation really are. they didn't like it, so they exaggerated. But we have objective definitions and don't have to respond emotionally. We can look at the defintion, look at what they are doing and know that it isn't any of those things, even if we're against it being done.

And you don't help your position by continuing to exaggerate and misrerpresent.
Click to expand...



all of them? really?


pathetic.


I can say I am sure some are exagerating, some may even be lying, but no way in hell would I sit here like a smug sycophant for the obama admin claiming they are all lying and exagerating. If I did that, I would look pathetic. :shrug:


Still no real responses to my last 5 links I see. :pimpdaddy:


JitterbugDancers.jpg
 
It's a psycological control. The real purpose is to create a humble, obeydient majority so they can rule like a tyrant.

Rogues steal the government office. To expand their power they created false flag terror attack. (such like OKC bombing, 911 attack) They got what they want with the passing through of Patriot Act.

Rogues like to bully people with their power. They peep, eavesdrop, track people. They search, arrest and murder people.

To achieve this they developed the false flag terror attack to intimidate the public. Take the advantage of public's panic to squeeze more money and power from them.

Those villains have no other abilities but to persecute people. To show they are super than ordinary people they developed "security rule" to insult, humiliate people by "see through" and pat down your body. The ruling class want to create a humble and obeydient majority. Those incompetent people won't add any treasure to the society but enjoy the taxed money by expanded "security jobs".

Step by step, it becomes a totalitarian country.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
all of them? really?
Click to expand...

Agan, we have definitions and we know what is being done. All we have to is look at them. It really isn't hard.

And your links shed no new light, so why would you expect a response?
 
kathaksung said:
It's a psycological control. The real purpose is to create a humble, obeydient majority so they can rule like a tyrant.

Rogues steal the government office. To expand their power they created false flag terror attack. (such like OKC bombing, 911 attack) They got what they want with the passing through of Patriot Act.

Rogues like to bully people with their power. They peep, eavesdrop, track people. They search, arrest and murder people.

To achieve this they developed the false flag terror attack to intimidate the public. Take the advantage of public's panic to squeeze more money and power from them.

Those villains have no other abilities but to persecute people. To show they are super than ordinary people they developed "security rule" to insult, humiliate people by "see through" and pat down your body. The ruling class want to create a humble and obeydient majority. Those incompetent people won't add any treasure to the society but enjoy the taxed money by expanded "security jobs".

Step by step, it becomes a totalitarian country.
Click to expand...


You are not helping with your conspiracy nut bunk. Just saying. :shrug:
 
Boo Radley said:
Agan, we have definitions and we knnow what is being done. All we have to is look at them. It really isn't hard.

And your links shed no new light, so why would you expect a response?
Click to expand...


Perhaps I expected a response because I confused you with an honest person. My bad. seriously, they are all not telling the truth?


yes or no.
 
kathaksung said:
It's a psycological control. The real purpose is to create a humble, obeydient majority so they can rule like a tyrant.

Rogues steal the government office. To expand their power they created false flag terror attack. (such like OKC bombing, 911 attack) They got what they want with the passing through of Patriot Act.

Rogues like to bully people with their power. They peep, eavesdrop, track people. They search, arrest and murder people.

To achieve this they developed the false flag terror attack to intimidate the public. Take the advantage of public's panic to squeeze more money and power from them.

Those villains have no other abilities but to persecute people. To show they are super than ordinary people they developed "security rule" to insult, humiliate people by "see through" and pat down your body. The ruling class want to create a humble and obeydient majority. Those incompetent people won't add any treasure to the society but enjoy the taxed money by expanded "security jobs".

Step by step, it becomes a totalitarian country.
Click to expand...

Oh, you make my head hurt. What a wild leap. Airport screenings are the gateway to a totalitarian government. Damn, education really has failed us all.

Sad.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Perhaps I expected a response because I confused you with an honest person. My bad. seriously, they are all not telling the truth?


yes or no.
Click to expand...

As I said, they don't have their definitions correct. what they describe is not fondling, not gropping, and not molestation. So they are factually incorrect. This is not hard to understand.
 
Boo Radley said:
Have you asked for any support, or do you still insist that claiming it is all that is needed?
Click to expand...



I think in lieu of the massive number of complaints, it needs to be investigated seriously, and not chalked up to blame the victim mentality that you engage in.


Do you blame her for having big boobs? :yes:



I bet if her ticket doesn't have the "ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ" across the bottom. this won't be the last we hear of it.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
Really?


US woman claims airport security singled her out because of her boobs
Click to expand...

My Breasts Pass Unchecked by Airport Screeners: Caroline Baum - Bloomberg
In the same article where I was introduced to Eliana, I learned that lots of women have been on the receiving end of breast stares. What’s so bad about that? There was a time -- think Marilyn Monroe -- when women encouraged longing looks from the opposite sex with cinched-in waists and cups that runneth over.

The objection to a full body scan from a vocal, 15 percent of the populace, according to a CBS Poll, seems even lamer. It’s hard to imagine the grainy images -- about as racy as an X-ray - -arousing anyone when far more graphic material is available at a newsstand in most airports.
Click to expand...
In the meantime, surly travelers need to find alternate means of transportation or adopt a better attitude toward airport security.

I, for one, am relieved to go through the full body scanner for the simple reason that it means I’m done with airport security. I can put on my shoes, collect my separately bagged liquids, proceed to the departure gate, buy something to drink and begin the interminable wait for my flight. If I had worn a push-up bra, I might still be back at the starting gate.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
I think in lieu of the massive number of complaints, it needs to be investigated seriously, and not chalked up to blame the victim mentality that you engage in.


Do you blame her for having big boobs? :yes:


I bet if her ticket doesn't have the "ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ" across the bottom. this won't be the last we hear of it.
Click to expand...
If they require her to buy a seat for each one, I'll volunteer mine. :mrgreen:
 
Boo Radley said:
I have no problem with either the scanner or being searched
Click to expand...

well, good for you!

Boo Radley said:
I say there is no reason for anyone to see it that way
Click to expand...

okay...

Boo Radley said:
Agian, there are real issues
Click to expand...

but you just said you had no problem with the pat downs and screens

Boo Radley said:
There may be reason to oppose the procedures
Click to expand...

oh, what would those objections be, barrister?

Boo Radley said:
So, we really need to put this to bed and move on.
Click to expand...

put what to bed, the dictionary definitions of the words fondle and grope?

they were resolved hundreds of years ago, silly

Boo Radley said:
stop the exaggerating and let's debate something honestly and of substance
Click to expand...

but bennie thompson and sheila jackson lee already did

the chair and senior member of house homeland security don't use the semantics you're so stuck on, remember?

they call it---running afoul of PRIVACY and CIVIL LIBERTIES

why don't you debate honestly and substantially with THEM

Boo Radley said:
Honest debate doesn't accept this kind of dishonesty.
Click to expand...

LOL!

no filter equals no self respect
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom