Page 4 of 88 FirstFirst ... 234561454 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 879

Thread: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

  1. #31
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,444

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by Viktyr Korimir View Post
    We'd all be much safer if they'd just put armed agents on the planes in the first place, and stop with all of this over-the-top security nonsense. You can't stop terrorists from finding ways to attack us, no matter how much "security" you're willing to put up with. The security we need is the ability to respond appropriately to actual threats.

    edit: Of course, the whole point of the "security" is to make sure we stay angry and scared and ready to blame targets of convenience.
    We should unleash our military prowess upon the terrorists, throw the rule book out the window and make them all rue the day they killed a single American.

    As long as we play by the rules and the enemy doesn't, the enemy will always have the advantage. Basically, they're using our own rules against us.

    Body seraching a three-year-old girl, in the name of, "not profiling", isn't going to make us more secure.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #32
    Professor
    Travelsonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 03:45 PM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,375

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    I support the TSA. Flying is a privilege,
    The issue at heart is with the method of security, not IMO the mode of transportation - but so what? Why should one be forced to endure invasive and inefficient [maybe borderline ILLEGAL] screening procedures when they don't necessarily work, and the same task can be accomplished without said methods...?


    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    It's our civic duty to consent to searches to ensure the safety of ourselves and other fliers.
    True - to a point. When those searches go beyond a reasonable level - which, I admit is subjective, it is our civic duty to object and protest in whatever legal means are possible.

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    The TSA is necessary and not unreasonable.
    You're defending an agency with a long history of incompetece, with agents who think it fun to pland drugs on passengers, try breaking into aircraft by climbing onto their sensitive equipment [and rendering the aircraft inop], evne stal from baggage. Who FAILS nearly every, if not every, government check to make sure they can keep a damned bomb out of the airport "steril area."

    Airport security is necessary. The TSA is not. How is it that we made it 98 years in the history of commercial aviation without it, but now all of a sudden we are somehow incapable of even using WHAT WE HAVE, and somehow need to be more invasive without PROVING that it is needed, or that we can't keep passengers safe without it?

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    I think what is unreasonable is the people who want to compromise the safety of others because they are uncomfortable with being searched.
    The problem is with these methods, not airport security overall - and if blind supporters of the TSA had ANY shred of intellectual honesty, they'd start by acknowledging that you can be opposed to these methods and still want some level of airport security.
    Nationalism in high dosages may be hazardous to your health. Please consult a psychiatrist before beginning a regular regimen, and if feelings of elitism and douchbaggery continue, discontinue immediately before you become unable to do so on your own.

  3. #33
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    This guys a f*g idiot. I have as much respect for him as I do idiots on youtube that go up with videocameras attempting to harass protestors into something embarassing for a viral video on youtube.
    Except he didn't seek out the confrontation at all.

    <Insert title here>: Motivation of my filming of my TSA encounter

    Actually less so. 15 minute famous prick as far as I'm concerned. Like doctors dont touch his balls.
    Doctors also put their fingers in your ass and give women mammograms. I'm sure you'd be happy if TSA agents did that to you next time you flew.

    edit: why is fag not censored?
    Because most posters here are mature enough not to use it as an insult.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  4. #34
    Stigmatized! End R Word! Kali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Seen
    08-19-12 @ 12:29 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    13,334
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    TSA= big bully wanna be GOD!
    ~Following My Own Flow~

  5. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    Doctors also put their fingers in your ass and give women mammograms. I'm sure you'd be happy if TSA agents did that to you next time you flew.
    I'm not sure if what you say is logically valid in any way... but it is a little funny.

    Because most posters here are mature enough not to use it as an insult.[/QUOTE]

    Same with nigger and **** and cracker whore face....?

    ^^ ahh..... ic. (edit)

  6. #36
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    I'm not sure if what you say is logically valid in any way... but it is a little funny.
    No, it's pretty straightforward. You argued that he shouldn't care about a TSA agent touching his balls because doctors do the same things. Doctors also shove their fingers up people's asses. Does that mean nobody should complain if the TSA wants to do that?
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  7. #37
    Stigmatized! End R Word! Kali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Seen
    08-19-12 @ 12:29 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    13,334
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by Viktyr Korimir View Post
    We'd all be much safer if they'd just put armed agents on the planes in the first place, and stop with all of this over-the-top security nonsense. You can't stop terrorists from finding ways to attack us, no matter how much "security" you're willing to put up with. The security we need is the ability to respond appropriately to actual threats.

    edit: Of course, the whole point of the "security" is to make sure we stay angry and scared and ready to blame targets of convenience.
    I forget what airline but one of the most safe? They do just that and have never had any problems. Of course it is not a U.S. based airline. I forget but it is one of those in middle east I think?
    ~Following My Own Flow~

  8. #38
    Androgyne
    Dr_Patrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Montana
    Last Seen
    12-16-15 @ 11:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,349
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Doctor's are also qualified to feel people up and do so for a very important purpose. This is completely ridiculous. The security protocols after 9/11 have worked just fine. Why have they suddenly decided to amp them up even further? I understand that security protocols are very important and prevent horrible things from happening. However, there comes a point when it goes too far.

  9. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    No, it's pretty straightforward. You argued that he shouldn't care about a TSA agent touching his balls because doctors do the same things.

    Doctors also shove their fingers up people's asses. Does that mean nobody should complain if the TSA wants to do that?
    As far as I'm concerned if this guy is being earnest and not acting up for his camera and his 15 minutes of fame then he gets squeamish at the urinal next to other men.

    Considering a smart terrorist would shove bomb material up his ass, sure... if someone violates protocol to the point where contingencies and procedure suggest this man should have a finger shoved up his ass, hell yeah. What kind of bitchboy freaks like they're being molested when a TSA agent has to pat them down? I'd like to see him try the same type of **** with a state trooper. Oh wait? Isn't that how they catch drug offenders?

  10. #40
    Professor
    Travelsonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 03:45 PM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,375

    Re: TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    As far as I'm concerned if this guy is being earnest and not acting up for his camera and his 15 minutes of fame then he gets squeamish at the urinal next to other men.
    Wow, and you call RightinNYC out for illogical arguing?

    You've compared the TSA to doctors, and opposing their patdowns to being squeemish because you stand next to somebody at a urinal... how is your credibility not shot at this point?


    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    if someone violates protocol to the point where contingencies and procedure suggest this man should have a finger shoved up his ass, hell yeah.

    Except 1. the procedures don't allow it and 2. federal and state laws probably trumnp your trigger happy desire to have him rectally checked.

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    What kind of bitchboy freaks like they're being molested when a TSA agent has to pat them down? I'd like to see him try the same type of **** with a state trooper. Oh wait? Isn't that how they catch drug offenders?
    TSA =/= cops, a real cop, if using the wbi scanners or the types of patdowns implemented THIS MONTH, would probably be sued, arrested, reprimanded, or all of the above.
    Nationalism in high dosages may be hazardous to your health. Please consult a psychiatrist before beginning a regular regimen, and if feelings of elitism and douchbaggery continue, discontinue immediately before you become unable to do so on your own.

Page 4 of 88 FirstFirst ... 234561454 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •