Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: White House edits stain its reliance on science

  1. #31
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    Another anti Obama thread that totally ignores the fact that the Bush administration did the same thing.
    Bush lied on official documents and put tens of thousands of people out of work? Really? When?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #32
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    So, let me see if I can figure this out:

    1) Obama is the Messiah. Liberals support him for everything.
    2) Obama's approval ratings are tanking, Democrats are fleeing from him, liberals are disenchanted.
    3) When liberals oppose Obama, it's just lip service. Secretly, they support him for everything.

    I'm having trouble reconciling these, can you give me a hand?

    I also love the broad generalization about all liberals being 100% behind the moratorium.

    Me? I'm for the moratorium, but against politicians editing statements made by experts.
    When things go south for The One, you boys sure are quick to jump ship.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  3. #33
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:04 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,484
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    Another anti Obama thread that totally ignores the fact that the Bush administration did the same thing.
    Time to put up the goods Pete. Where and when did the Bush Admin go before the court with falsified documents and shut down drilling, putting an industry and its folks on leave?

    Links please.

    .
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  4. #34
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    When things go south for The One, you boys sure are quick to jump ship.
    But you just said that it's "only lip service." How do you manage to hold these two opposing views simultaneously?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  5. #35
    pawn in the game of life
    pragmatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    10-17-17 @ 05:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1,984

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Oh, going before the court with falsified documents, and selling their case using those doctored docs, and having the judge make his ruling on that evidence is criminal.

    Calling Congressman Issa... calling Congressman Issa... Congressman Issa... pick up the Red Phone please.

    .
    Suspect the chances of any genuine investigation or ramifications for the actions are minimal. Was certainly bogus/slimy what they did in the report, but then again we are talking about politicians here. The WH and Administration have already come out with their "oops, just an innocent mis-communication" defense.


    " The inspector general found that the experts themselves, when contacted by Salazar's office, felt that a mistake had been made.

    "There was no intent to mislead the public," said Kendra Barkoff, an Interior Department spokeswoman. "As the report makes clear, the misunderstanding with the reviewers was resolved with the June 3 letter and a subsequent conference call with those experts."

    Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said that "the White House properly coordinated review for a draft document, incorporating comments and feedback from White House offices and other agencies with expertise." Any misunderstanding about the experts' position, Burton said, was quickly corrected by the Interior Department."






    Annoying and disappointing. But hard to imagine anyone of significance gets burned for it.


    Interior Department report on oil drilling moratorium misleading - Los Angeles Times


    .


    “Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •