Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: White House edits stain its reliance on science

  1. #21
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:55 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,496

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by RyrineaHaruno View Post
    Please, your the one that are labeling us as supporters of a bill that we never claimed to support.
    You opposed the drilling moratorium? You opposed the president abusing his authority, by using an executive order to inact a ban, that he knew would kill jobs?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    All dem demokrats supported dat drilling moratorium dat took all dem jobs yep. Dey hate the jobs. I have fundamentally disproven their political beliefs. Yep.
    Badingadangdoo...

  3. #23
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:55 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,496

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    All dem demokrats supported dat drilling moratorium dat took all dem jobs yep. Dey hate the jobs. I have fundamentally disproven their political beliefs. Yep.
    Badingadangdoo...
    You're more interested in mockery, than in answering the question.

    BTW, I'm not white, so that's a crappy comparison.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  4. #24
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:04 AM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,484
    Blog Entries
    12

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by RyrineaHaruno View Post
    I am not sure who your talking about here, because I was not saying I supported it. And no it hasn't been common Knowledge that they did edit it until the moratorium was already almost signed. Please tell me, when I supported this moratorium at all.in. Apdst I have supported states right above all else, and the rights of the people voting for a ban but never did I actually support the measure.
    The WSJ was working this story months ago... when the experts were pissed their recommendations were altered, as they believed it would do greater harm and put us at greater risk for future drilling probs. Journolists, as usual, looked the other way and were heard humming "Hey Bama, Oh Bama, Bama Bama, O-bama."

    A DP thread dating from June 17, 2010 about this matter.
    http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaki...oratorium.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Morality Games View Post
    There is little synchronicity between what scientists want, politicians want, and the people want. This is less about what environmentalists desire and more about what the American people expect in response to disaster.
    There should be "synchronicity"... ahhh... true representations of statements of experts when going before a Judge or Court.

    Most American certainly do not expect the government to falsify documents before a judge, but there are certain elements (obviously the Obama Admin) that don't really care about the means... but their politically motivated... ideological result. It's how we get statements like... we have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it... type garbage. It's how you get Black Panther cases tossed by the DOJ. In a similar vein, it's how you get Sandy Burgler stuffing docs down his pants from the National Archives... docs related to Clinton and 911... and then destroying the evidence.

    What we have here is ideology trumping truthful representation of expert witnesses.

    Throw the book at the Interior Dept. bums and anyone else involved.

    .
    Last edited by zimmer; 11-12-10 at 03:26 AM.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You're more interested in mockery, than in answering the question.

    BTW, I'm not white, so that's a crappy comparison.
    I can't tell. I'm Colorblind o(~.')b Like Colbert.

  6. #26
    Sage
    PeteEU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,090

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Another anti Obama thread that totally ignores the fact that the Bush administration did the same thing.
    PeteEU

  7. #27
    long standing member
    justabubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:11 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    36,153

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    Another anti Obama thread that totally ignores the fact that the Bush administration did the same thing.
    yes pete, and a much worse result as well

    but that does not cause Obama to be excused for engaging in this deceptive practice

    that is not change i can believe in
    we are negotiating about dividing a pizza and in the meantime israel is eating it
    once you're over the hill you begin to pick up speed

  8. #28
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    When Libbos oppose Obama, it's just lip service, anyway.

    You were all 100% behind the moratorium, from the git-go. The experts on the panel said back then, "we never suggested a drilling ban", and every last one of you jumped on the band wagon, anyway.
    So, let me see if I can figure this out:

    1) Obama is the Messiah. Liberals support him for everything.
    2) Obama's approval ratings are tanking, Democrats are fleeing from him, liberals are disenchanted.
    3) When liberals oppose Obama, it's just lip service. Secretly, they support him for everything.

    I'm having trouble reconciling these, can you give me a hand?

    I also love the broad generalization about all liberals being 100% behind the moratorium.

    Me? I'm for the moratorium, but against politicians editing statements made by experts.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  9. #29
    Guru
    Councilman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Riverside, County, CA.
    Last Seen
    11-04-11 @ 10:16 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,454
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    this is not transparency
    this is obfuscation

    this is NOT change we can believe in
    I would say editorially the this is both transparency and openness, because it's openly transparent that this Administration has once again be caught attempting to deceive the everyone.

    This goes hand in hand with all the evidence that has come out in the last year about the Global Warming HOAX, and all the deliberate flaws uncovered in Gores now disgraced BE movie.

    But as I have said be before Obama will either ignore it try to shift the blame and if all else fails, lie, lie again.

    I swear I have tried my best to figure out how anyone could still be defending this fraud, amateur, idiot, pick one they all fit and more, but I have come up with only one thing and that is the most frightening thing of all. The possibility that so many were putting so much hope and trust into Obama because they had all been convinced by radical extremists that President Bush was all the evil, vile, despicable, things he was accused of, they now can't let go of the dream, or more accurately, the delusions.

    Anyone can be sucked if you are bombarded by propaganda when it's as nonstop as it has been for the last three plus years, and ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, have never told the public the truth about Obama and everyday leave something out of the news. It's called lies of omission, and they are all also guilty of helping to demonize President Bush beyond what he deserved.

    President Bush was a lot of things and did somethings wrong a lot of which I complained about but he Obama is not who he is still being made out to be by the Liberal Left wing media.

    I would recommend holding your breath that this will be the lead story on MSNBC, any time soon.
    Last edited by Councilman; 11-13-10 at 07:16 AM.

  10. #30
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:55 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,496

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    I can't tell. I'm Colorblind o(~.')b Like Colbert.
    So, that's why you chose a white redneck, with a beer in his hand and a speach impetiment as a representation of me? Because you're color blind?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •