Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: White House edits stain its reliance on science

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Humble Texas
    Last Seen
    06-25-11 @ 05:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by Whovian View Post
    I see the liberals are staying away in droves. Either they are also pissed, or they have not yet received their opinions and marching orders from Olbermann and Maddow.
    For right know Pissed off liberal, until I am fully informed on this subject to form an opinion on this until I hear more. I will comment later on this subject, but I will say I disapprove of this admissibly. .
    Last edited by RyrineaHaruno; 11-11-10 at 07:45 PM.

  2. #12
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,580

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Oh, going before the court with falsified documents, and selling their case using those doctored docs, and having the judge make his ruling on that evidence is criminal.

    Calling Congressman Issa... calling Congressman Issa... Congressman Issa... pick up the Red Phone please.

    .
    Yep! A federal judge did look at this case, twice. Looks like a crime to me.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  3. #13
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,580

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by RyrineaHaruno View Post
    For right know Pissed off liberal, until I am fully informed on this subject to form an opinion on this until I hear more. I will comment later on this subject, but I will say I disapprove of this admissibly. .
    This isn't news, ya know. It's been common knowledge since the first day of the moritorium, that the expert panel never recommended a drilling halt.

    And, you've supported those tyrannical bastards all along.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  4. #14
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,580

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    The moment you say "liberals are staying away," we're more likely to stay away. Because then it looks like they're responding because of your prodding.

    Wait. That's what I'm doing. DAMNIT.

    Anyway. This sounds like some shady business. I'd like to see the original report and the edits that the White House made. This is the kind of bull**** that always happens when you let politicians and bureaucrats get ahold of the work done by scientists before its published. Dictator Deuce would never allow such things.
    When Libbos oppose Obama, it's just lip service, anyway.

    You were all 100% behind the moratorium, from the git-go. The experts on the panel said back then, "we never suggested a drilling ban", and every last one of you jumped on the band wagon, anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You were all 100% behind the moratorium, from the git-go. The experts on the panel said back then, "we never suggested a drilling ban", and every last one of you jumped on the band wagon, anyway.
    Not me.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Humble Texas
    Last Seen
    06-25-11 @ 05:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    This isn't news, ya know. It's been common knowledge since the first day of the moritorium, that the expert panel never recommended a drilling halt.

    And, you've supported those tyrannical bastards all along.
    I am not sure who your talking about here, because I was not saying I supported it. And no it hasn't been common Knowledge that they did edit it until the moratorium was already almost signed. Please tell me, when I supported this moratorium at all.in. Apdst I have supported states right above all else, and the rights of the people voting for a ban but never did I actually support the measure.
    Last edited by RyrineaHaruno; 11-11-10 at 08:08 PM.

  7. #17
    Guru
    Morality Games's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Last Seen
    05-24-16 @ 10:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,733

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    There is little synchronicity between what scientists want, politicians want, and the people want. This is less about what environmentalists desire and more about what the American people expect in response to disaster.
    If you notice something good in yourself, give credit to God, not to yourself, but be certain the evil you commit is always your own and yours to acknowledge.

    St. Benedict

  8. #18
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,580

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    Not me.
    So, are we supposed to believe that you opposed the moratorium? Right!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Humble Texas
    Last Seen
    06-25-11 @ 05:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    1,827

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    So, are we supposed to believe that you opposed the moratorium? Right!!!
    Please, your the one that are labeling us as supporters of a bill that we never claimed to support.

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: White House edits stain its reliance on science

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    So, are we supposed to believe that you opposed the moratorium? Right!!!
    I dont know, it wasn't an issue I was concerned with or payed any attention to.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •