And you haven't used a single fact or source.
The fact is Obama is hiding the cost. That tells me it is very high. You have no proof it is less because Obama is hiding the cost
Cost of Obama's Trip to India Angers Right - Political Hotsheet - CBS News
Trip to Mumbai | FactCheck.org
See how easy that is, costs for these trips simply aren't available for a few years because most of the costs go to security. While this is annoying there isn't any reason to believe that the cost is anything ususual because the fact is all presidential trips are expensive and this one is only getting attention because of serious misinformation spread early on.
Except Obama is taking more people and vehicles than past presidents
Yet you can't prove it did not cost close to that since Obama will not say how much taxpayer money was spent
I haven't found anything that says that, which is unfortunate because that means there is no reason people are more worried about what the trip costed as opposed to what was actually done.
So if some one makes a random, unsourced outrageous claim, it's up to others to prove them wrong? It doesn't really work that way. In the absence of evidence, those random, unsourced outrageous claims are usually considered false.
They may be false but they may also be close to the figure. Obama will not say
Your own source says that the figures are grossly inflated. How about this Glenn Beck eats three children everytime he finishes his show and goes home. Prove to me he doesn't, I don't see Mr. Beck telling us how many children he's having for dinner tonight so I have to assume it's a lot.
All the evidence is that it is much less. In fact, there is a total of zero evidence this trip was particularly expensive, and yet you keep suggesting it is...
You have no proof. 40 cars several airplanes and thousands of people. A huge carbon foot print
I am a space alien. You have no proof that I am not, so based on your logic, you have to consider it probable that I really am a space alien, even though there is no evidence except I told you it was true.
This business both sides seem to have about not needing to show proof of their claims & instead stating the other side has to disprove... there's a medical condition which describes that...
Axelrod Syndrome :ninja:
The side that needs to show proof is the side who makes the claim. The claim that Obama's trip somehow was especially expensive needs proof. There is none.
I did laugh though, good line.
I am a space alien. You have no proof that I am not, so based on your logic, you have to consider it probable that I really am a space alien, even though there is no evidence except I told you it was true.
The side that needs to show proof is the side who makes the claim. The claim that Obama's trip somehow was especially expensive needs proof. There is none.
I did laugh though, good line.
Where is the proof from the white house of how much of our money he is wasting on this trip
You just say the same thing over and over, no attempt to refute any other claim, no evidence you're right. This isn't a debate, it ended after your second post.