Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 135

Thread: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

  1. #101
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    09-03-15 @ 04:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    64

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    While I disagree with the law, tyranny is something our founding fathers and people fought a war over for eight years at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives.

    Tyranny is not a god damn happy meal
    where does it end?

  2. #102
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:45 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,586

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Patria Antiqua View Post
    How else can we ensure that people don't make the wrong decision?
    Here's a comprehensive list of the people who care how YOU think they should live their lives:







    That is all.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  3. #103
    Global Moderator
    Truth will set you free
    digsbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Metro Washington DC
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,984

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    This is a stupid law. San Francisco is a crazy backwards city. People have the right to be fat and eat bad food. The state has no business telling people what to eat.
    When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
    Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.

  4. #104
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by boblzer0 View Post
    they know and thinking they don't is insulting. you'd have to live in a cave not to know. barebacking is super badass. the only person who would think it isn't is someone like you who has never had sex without paying for it therefore you always have to rubber up.
    What crawled up your ass?
    Oh wait, I already know.

  5. #105
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:45 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,586

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    This is a stupid law. San Francisco is a crazy backwards city. People have the right to be fat and eat bad food. The state has no business telling people what to eat.
    Just wait until the state pays for all of your health care. Then, they own you, inside and out. So yeah, they will be able to mandate what you can and can't eat.

    And backers of single-payer health care will tell you that's perfectly OK.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  6. #106
    User eyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Seen
    11-07-10 @ 01:02 AM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grim17 View Post
    Welcome to the former Soviet Union Comrades.
    No.

    Welcome to the United Socialist States of America, citizen.
    Stuck @ Independence

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    I have seen stuff on Glenn Beck about government here and there banning and censoring and such. One issue was that words are being taken out of textbooks. Words such as "chariwoman, chairman, caveman," etc. Anything ending with -man or -woman. Can anyone discredit Beck on this or not?

  8. #108
    Dungeon Master
    Veni, vidi, dormivi!

    spud_meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Didjabringabeeralong
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    33,874
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    Just wait until the state pays for all of your health care. Then, they own you, inside and out. So yeah, they will be able to mandate what you can and can't eat.

    And backers of single-payer health care will tell you that's perfectly OK.
    Then how come my country has never done anything like this? We've had socialised healthcare since 1975 and there has been no concerted push to ban toys in happy meals. Methinks you made a logical fallacy.
    So follow me into the desert
    As desperate as you are
    Where the moon is glued to a picture of heaven
    And all the little pigs have God

  9. #109
    Stigmatized! End R Word! Kali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Seen
    08-19-12 @ 12:29 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    13,334
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by boblzer0 View Post
    where does it end?
    It ends when we are a NAZI ASS Country
    ~Following My Own Flow~

  10. #110
    Sage
    Barbbtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    W'Ford TX
    Last Seen
    11-10-12 @ 08:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    8,467

    Re: McDonald's Happy Meal Toys to be Banned in San Francisco?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake View Post
    I have seen stuff on Glenn Beck about government here and there banning and censoring and such. One issue was that words are being taken out of textbooks. Words such as "chariwoman, chairman, caveman," etc. Anything ending with -man or -woman. Can anyone discredit Beck on this or not?
    Here's a sample of what is being done to textbooks and history. There's more in the link.
    What are we turning into with all this PC crap? And not showing PICTURES of what the elite consider unhealthy foods.....Who the hell do they think they are anyway?


    FOXNews.com - Textbook Changes Draw Charges of Political Correctness - U.S. & World

    many textbooks will no longer feature pictures of hot dogs, sodas, cakes, butter and other kinds of food that are not considered nutritious. Nor will the books contain any phrases judged to be sexist or politically insensitive.

    The Founding Fathers, for instance, are now referred to as "The Framers," in an apparent effort to make them sound less male-dominant. And there will be no more reading about Mount Rushmore, where the faces of four U.S. presidents are carved into stone, because it appears to offend some American-Indian groups.

    Snowman? No more. Melt that image and replace with Snowperson. Want to sail away on a yacht? No, again. It’s too elitist.
    Catawa is my favorite bleeding heart liberal.
    1/27/12

Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •