Guy Incognito
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 14, 2010
- Messages
- 11,216
- Reaction score
- 2,846
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
1) you don't appear to have the education in the law to actually define perjury
I don't claim to have an education in the law, but I know what perjury is, and I know that Clarence Thomas committed it if he lied under oath about Anita Hill at his sworn Senate confirmation hearing.
Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court Justice, I'm talking about an impeachment. It's a totally different standard. The Clinton impeachment is a precisely analogous situation.2) you don't have the ability to create enough probable cause to merit an indictment for it
Well if that's true, you must have lost the argument already when you insulted me first. Plus, you're totally whining dude.3) insulting me proves you have lost the argument
4) you appear rather bitter-making a mountain over some greedy twit's molehill to try to impeach someone over stuff that has long expired in terms of legitimate inquiry is pathetic
So you acknowledge that we're talking about impeachment and not criminal proceedings, yet you still got the standard wrong! Looks like that legal education did wonders for you, TD :roll:
Last edited: