Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 160

Thread: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

  1. #101
    Sage
    scourge99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Wild West
    Last Seen
    01-27-12 @ 02:50 AM
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    6,233

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Assuming this is true, WHY SHOULD ANYONE CARE?

    I don't care if angelina jolie is having a baby much less if Clarence Thomas is a philanderer.
    If you believe in the Supernatural then you can become a millionaire!

    Questioning or criticizing another's core beliefs is inadvertently perceived as offensive and rude.

  2. #102
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by scourge99 View Post
    Assuming this is true, WHY SHOULD ANYONE CARE?

    I don't care if angelina jolie is having a baby much less if Clarence Thomas is a philanderer.
    You should care if Justice Thomas is a perjurer, though. It's your civic duty.

  3. #103
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:38 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,569

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    You should care if Justice Thomas is a perjurer, though. It's your civic duty.
    You keep saying he's a "perjurer."

    Your only possible argument is that by denying Anita Hill's claims, he lied under oath.

    Thus, you have nothing. And you dare call others partisan hacks.

    At least with Clinton, that he lied under oath is not in doubt. The only question there is whether or not the lies were material.
    Last edited by Harshaw; 10-25-10 at 05:21 PM.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  4. #104
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    You keep saying he's a "perjurer."

    Your only possible argument is that by denying Anita Hill's claims, he lied under oath.

    Thus, you have nothing. And you dare call others partisan hacks.

    At least with Clinton, that he lied under oath is not in doubt. The only question there is whether or not the lies were material.
    Bah! Just because it is difficult to prove that Thomas perjured himself doesn't mean he deserves to get away with it. The partisan hackery comes into play when right-wingers ignore the mountain of circumstantial evidence and hide behind the slim shadow of a doubt that Thomas didn't lie under oath. And the hypocrisy comes in whenever the same right-wingers apply a higher standard to the likes of Clinton and Gore. To an honest, objective observer, all the evidence indicates that Thomas lied under oath, and there is at least enough evidence to warrant an investigation. Anybody who says otherwise is a hack of the highest magnitude.
    Last edited by Guy Incognito; 10-25-10 at 05:31 PM.

  5. #105
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:38 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,569

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    Bah! Just because it is difficult to prove that Thomas perjured himself doesn't mean he deserves to get away with it. The partisan hackery comes into play when right-wingers ignore the mountain of circumstantial evidence and hide behind the slim shadow of a doubt that Thomas didn't lie under oath. And the hypocrisy comes in whenever the same right-wingers apply a higher standard to the likes of Clinton and Gore. To an honest, objective observer, all the evidence indicates that Thomas lied under oath, and there is at least enough evidence to warrant an investigation. Anybody who says otherwise is a hack of the highest magnitude.
    The bravado is all very well, but fact is, you're completely convinced of his guilt based on extremely shaky evidence ("objective observer," indeed :ROFL). And, as I keep pointing out, you have the nerve to call others partisan hacks . . .

    What "higher standard"? As I said, Clinton's lying under oath isn't in doubt. He did. And also I already said that impeaching him for it was stupid.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  6. #106
    Sage
    mpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,769

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    Bah! Just because it is difficult to prove that Thomas perjured himself doesn't mean he deserves to get away with it. The partisan hackery comes into play when right-wingers ignore the mountain of circumstantial evidence and hide behind the slim shadow of a doubt that Thomas didn't lie under oath. And the hypocrisy comes in whenever the same right-wingers apply a higher standard to the likes of Clinton and Gore. To an honest, objective observer, all the evidence indicates that Thomas lied under oath, and there is at least enough evidence to warrant an investigation. Anybody who says otherwise is a hack of the highest magnitude.
    McEwen didn't even corroborate Hill's testimony. McEwen merely accused Thomas of being a heterosexual. Even if McEwen's assertions are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, they're nothing.
    If you expect people to be rational, you aren't being rational.

  7. #107
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by mpg View Post
    McEwen didn't even corroborate Hill's testimony. McEwen merely accused Thomas of being a heterosexual. Even if McEwen's assertions are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, they're nothing.
    Ah, but you're mistaken. McEwen does corroborate many elements of Hill's account, particularly the predilection for porn. It's not like it's a huge game changer, Anita Hill already passed a lie detector test and Thomas refused to take a lie detector test at all. So it's just another bit of evidence in the mountain of evidence against Thomas.

  8. #108
    Sage
    mpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,769

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    Ah, but you're mistaken. McEwen does corroborate many elements of Hill's account, particularly the predilection for porn. It's not like it's a huge game changer, Anita Hill already passed a lie detector test and Thomas refused to take a lie detector test at all. So it's just another bit of evidence in the mountain of evidence against Thomas.
    Where is this mountain of evidence that you speak of? Why wasn't it posted in this thread? This can't be part of it because this is nothing. This isn't even a grain of sand, and that's assuming that it's true, a huge assumption.
    If you expect people to be rational, you aren't being rational.

  9. #109
    Conservative Independent
    DarkWizard12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Tyler TX
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,562

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    Ah, but you're mistaken. McEwen does corroborate many elements of Hill's account, particularly the predilection for porn. It's not like it's a huge game changer, Anita Hill already passed a lie detector test and Thomas refused to take a lie detector test at all. So it's just another bit of evidence in the mountain of evidence against Thomas.
    A lie detector test is not evidence, and is not admissable in court. Please quit misrepresenting fact and pretending it is so.

  10. #110
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Lillian McEwen breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas

    Quote Originally Posted by DarkWizard12 View Post
    A lie detector test is not evidence, and is not admissable in court. Please quit misrepresenting fact and pretending it is so.
    It doesn't have to be admissible evidence to be evidence from the perspective of common sense. Are you interested in the truth or are you interested in protecting Clarence Thomas at all costs?

Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •