- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Yes, I did, because I felt that your portrayal of the "pacifist screechers" was completely one-sided. Just because I feel that the debate over numbers is relatively unimportant doesn't mean I'm not going to call someone out on their bull**** when they put forward a ridiculous and one-sided assertion. For the exact same reason that I would, for example, comment on how it's stupid for someone to say that Stalin is responsible for 100 million deaths.
If "one-sidedness" were really your concern, you would have said so from the beginning. But alas, you did not. You chose instead to challenge my use of "pacifist screecher groups."
Besides, if you actually don't care how many died, it wouldn't concern you at all. Not to mention that my point didn't have anything to do with "your views" as you present them, so nothing I said warranted commented from you on those grounds.
Nor did the point I was making necessitate that I impugn pro-war groups.
Still want to help out?