• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Teleprompter to make its debut in Parliament when Obama speaks



Why do you call for evidence that Bush used a teleprompter less than Obama, but demand no evidence that Obama uses a teleprompter more than anyone else?[/quote] Ya know, I'll take either or, but to answer your question and clarify my request the claim was made:

Maybe the fact that Obama uses the teleprompter MUCH less often than Bush ever did...

So I want evidence that shows Obama used the teleprompter MUCH less, since that was positioned as a statement of fact.

Its the very definition of partisan hypocrisy, but I guess dealing with reality, a reality like "I have no real numbers to back up my statements," is easier when you have no standards.

It helps when you understand the request in the first place.
 
I'd be interested to see the numbers, but seeing as how I've seen and heard more Obama speeches in two years than I heard of Bush in 8 years, I think you might be way, way off on this assertion.



Words like corpsman? Did Bush ever thank himself in a speech?



None of us have any idea what Obama's grades were...are you sure you want to go there?



If I stand on a stage and tell you that I will heal the earth, stop the sea from rising and spread the wealth around, does that make me intelligent?

If you believe me when read those things from my teleprompter, does that mean you're gullible?

Bastinda, consider yourself owned. LOL
 
Back
Top Bottom