• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Secretive Republican Donors Are Planning Ahead

This is, of course, false, unless you can show that all of the $1.3T FY2009 deficit occured prior to Jan 21 2009.

Unfortunately Obama and the leadership of today's Democrat Party plays on the ignorance of their supporters and keep feeding those supporters false information that they want to believe. The fiscal year of the U.S. Runs from October to September thus fiscal year 2009 was October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009 so as you rightly pointed out there is no way that Obama inherited a 1.3 trillion deficit since deficits are on the yearly budget. This is just one of many lies we have heard from Obama yet his supporters don't seem to care.
 
Unfortunately Obama and the leadership of today's Democrat Party plays on the ignorance of their supporters and keep feeding those supporters false information that they want to believe.
Well, it IS much easier to blame the other guy about the problem rather than actually do what's needed to fix it.
 
YET More Private Sector Jobs Created In 2010 Than During Entire Bush Years.Pretty Amazing isn’t it?
JobsPrivateSector.jpg


According to the above,the private sector has added 863,000 jobs so far this year. Not nearly enough but like I said in previous threads, its at least pointed in the right direction….UP.:2wave:

Job Creation: Bush vs. Obama - By Veronique de Rugy - The Corner - National Review Online
Let’s look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

During the Bush presidency, net total employment went up by 1.08 million jobs. So far, during the Obama presidency, total employment has been reduced by 3.3 million jobs.

Under Bush, private employment shrank by 673,000 jobs, federal employment grew by 50,000 jobs, and government employment grew by 1,753,000 jobs.

Under Obama, the private sector has shed some 2.9 million jobs while the federal government has grown by 40,000 (after growing massively, the federal workforce shrank throughout the summer). Total government jobs, however, shrank by 357,000 jobs, mainly because of cuts at the state and local levels.


Now, we can’t really compare these numbers, because we have eight years of Bush data and only two years of Obama data. That’s why the chart below looks at the average monthly job creation under each president. There were more jobs created monthly under President Bush than under President Obama. Overall, most of the net jobs created under Bush were created in the government; many private sector jobs have been destroyed under Obama; and the number of government jobs has decreased, even though federal employment has grown.
image002.jpg


It's called, looking at the big picture, instead of a snapshot like Pelosi's office did with that chart you posted.
 
Yeah.... so?
What's this supposed to indicate? That the GOP might try to win in 2012?
Oh! Those villans!
:roll:

When you consider that during the 2006 election cycle, $136.7 million in outside dough was spent and we are on a path to more than double that….Yeh, its troubling to anyone with more than two active brain cells. Sooo…what’s your thoughts on the subject? :2wave:
 
When you consider that during the 2006 election cycle, $136.7 million in outside dough was spent and we are on a path to more than double that….Yeh, its troubling to anyone with more than two active brain cells. Sooo…what’s your thoughts on the subject? :2wave:
That your ad-hom does nothing to add credibility to your post - which is otherwise in dire need of assistance.
 
When you consider that during the 2006 election cycle, $136.7 million in outside dough was spent and we are on a path to more than double that….Yeh, its troubling to anyone with more than two active brain cells. Sooo…what’s your thoughts on the subject? :2wave:

Well, it's troubling to people who hate Republicans. How that intersects with the set of people with more than two active brain cells is unclear.
 
what's secretive is the way obamacare was written, deemed and crammed

what's secret is the grandfathering of those obscene aig bonuses by dead dodd and tax cheat in chief geithner

Dodd vs. Treasury: Who Is Responsible for AIG Loophole? - ABC News

what's nefarious is geithner's fed instructing aig to keep details of the abominable bailout secret from the sec

Geithner's New York Fed Pushed AIG To Keep Sweetheart Deals Secret (READ THE AIG EMAILS)

what's creepily clandestine is the secret sellout to phrma

Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma

hey, if you can't do health care on cspan like you promised 100 times, maybe you can do it in some hilly glade
 
That your ad-hom does nothing to add credibility to your post - which is otherwise in dire need of assistance.


It sounds like you OK with the current situation(Political power goes to the highest bidder) then? So be it.:shrug:
 
It sounds like you OK with the current situation(Political power goes to the highest bidder) then? So be it.:shrug:

From what I can tell, you are, too, when you find the outcome favorable.
 
It sounds like you OK with the current situation(Political power goes to the highest bidder) then? So be it.:shrug:
It -actually- sounds like I'm not going to allow you to pull the conversation away from what I said with your red herring.
 
Why not attend..after all it has the best Suprme Court Justices that CORP Money can buy.

< A secretive network of Republican donors is heading to the Palm Springs area for a long weekend in January, but it will not be to relax after a hard-fought election — it will be to plan for the next one.>

<The participants in Aspen dined under the stars at the top of the gondola run on Aspen Mountain, and listened to Glenn Beck of Fox News in a session titled, “Is America on the Road to Serfdom? >

Gotta get the ole brain washed.:roll:

<To encourage new participants, Mr. Koch offers to waive the $1,500 registration fee. And he notes that previous guests have included Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court, Gov. Haley Barbour and Gov. Bobby Jindal, Senators Jim DeMint and Tom Coburn, and Representatives Mike Pence, Tom Price and Paul D. Ryan.

Mr. Koch also notes the beautiful setting. But he advises against thinking of this as a vacation.

“Our ultimate goal is not ‘fun in the sun,’ ” he concludes. “This is a gathering of doers who are willing to engage in the hard work necessary to advance our shared principles. Success in this endeavor will require all the help we can muster.” >

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/us/politics/20koch.html?_r=2&ref=politics&pagewanted=all

These people have helped to stack teh courts since the days of Reagan. They now got what they want -- free reign. Now watch all the people cry as they get their jobs shipped overseas as the economy on Wall Street booms and the economy on Main St. goes down the toilet.

There are two American economies.
 
hey donc, can you post me a link to where you started threads on Sorros funding dems on all sorts of nincompoopery, thanks.
 
hey donc, can you post me a link to where you started threads on Sorros funding dems on all sorts of nincompoopery, thanks.

Wow! The Dems get one Billionaire publicly on their side for a few years and the cons go ape-poop? LOL

What ever happened to respecting people iwth money?
 
Wow! The Dems get one Billionaire publicly on their side for a few years and the cons go ape-poop? LOL

What ever happened to respecting people iwth money?


You only get respect if your name is Koch!!!
 
You only get respect if your name is Koch!!!

Billionaires funded the Clinton bs. Billionaires funded Nixon's illegal campaign schemes and the Watergate payoffs. Right wing Billionaires paid to have the courts filled with con judges who would eventually rule their way. It was a long term plan that worked out. It was not secret. They spoke openly about wanting to change things through the courts.
 
Wow! The Dems get one Billionaire publicly on their side for a few years and the cons go ape-poop? LOL

What ever happened to respecting people iwth money?




Sorry i dont respect criminals :shrug:
 
What if they are pardoned? How about Scooter Libby?




Dood what is your fetish with scooter libby? As i said in the other thread i dont give a **** about libby. Did you confuse me with a republican?
 
Dood what is your fetish with scooter libby? As i said in the other thread i dont give a **** about libby. Did you confuse me with a republican?

are you derailing yet another thread?
 
Wow! The Dems get one Billionaire publicly on their side for a few years and the cons go ape-poop? LOL

What ever happened to respecting people iwth money?

Soros hates america, is a convicted felon and an asshole

I blame Bush that soros is still around
 
It -actually- sounds like I'm not going to allow you to pull the conversation away from what I said with your red herring.


You said

What's this supposed to indicate? That the GOP might try to win in 2012?
Oh! Those villans!


to which I replied

When you consider that during the 2006 election cycle, $136.7 million in outside dough was spent and we are on a path to more than double that….Yeh, its troubling to anyone with more than two active brain cells. Sooo…what’s your thoughts on the subject?



You replied with

That your ad-hom does nothing to add credibility to your post - which is otherwise in dire need of assistance.



To which I replied with

It sounds like your OK with the current situation(Political power goes to the highest bidder) then? So be it.


To which you responded

It -actually- sounds like I'm not going to allow you to pull the conversation away from what I said with your red herring.


I don’t know, to me it looks pretty strait forward on my part; which is that the big bucks are trying to buy an election and hiding Corp shields while doing so.

If you want to dine on a red herring just jump into the Sorros debate.:2wave:
 
GOD! The same arguements over and over and...Damn the sameness of these blighted panderings that spew the gravy of either or everywhere is sickening. NEW direction The establishement is the left and right.
DAMN they both use government now to further their ends against the citizens. STOP move away from your party tickery
and quit suckin the blood out of the rest of us who see the system as broken and who are fastly becoming ill from your intellectual blathering it's old and TIRED as hell. And frankly I think we need a new direction. You both are to blame for unfair practices that give advantages to a communist over an american citizen and pretend that their is only one way to view America. BULL CRAP. Who cares who gave us the three trillion who cares about the war. I want American soverignty back yesterday. I want all the manufacturing. Who better deserves the security and strength than the AMERICAN people.
 
PH2008101603373.jpg

What did one Paranoid Liberal say to the other one?

You see those 11 Conservatives over there in that huddle? I'll bet they are talking about us.

This thread began life as a HUGE NON-STORY and has become a joke, and it's not even imaginative in it's attempt to make it into something it never was.

Let's see a group is openly getting together to discuss political strategy, well damn! Alert the Obamedia, call the CIA, NSA, FBI, MOUSE.

Get over it.
 
You said

What's this supposed to indicate? That the GOP might try to win in 2012?
Oh! Those villans!


to which I replied

When you consider that during the 2006 election cycle, $136.7 million in outside dough was spent and we are on a path to more than double that….Yeh, its troubling to anyone with more than two active brain cells. Sooo…what’s your thoughts on the subject?



You replied with

That your ad-hom does nothing to add credibility to your post - which is otherwise in dire need of assistance.



To which I replied with

It sounds like your OK with the current situation(Political power goes to the highest bidder) then? So be it.


To which you responded

It -actually- sounds like I'm not going to allow you to pull the conversation away from what I said with your red herring.


I don’t know, to me it looks pretty strait forward on my part; which is that the big bucks are trying to buy an election and hiding Corp shields while doing so.

If you want to dine on a red herring just jump into the Sorros debate.:2wave:

Hey, donc -- what say you about:

NA-BI593_AFSCME_NS_20101021210401.gif


I'm sure you find this just as outrageous, no?
 
Back
Top Bottom