• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid on the Ropes in Nevada

Boo Radley said:
Listening to her.

Her critics have admonished her for, among other things, deeming a BP fund of oil spill victims a "slush fund;" suggesting tea party followers will resort to "Second Amendment remedies" if Washington is not reformed; concluding that unemployment benefits have "spoiled our citizenry;" and blasting Democrats for pushing public benefits to "make government our God."

Sharron Angle Rewrites Policy Positions in Nevada Senate Race - US News and World Report

Not to mention her attack ads are as bad as any:

Angle’s Shocking - and Misleading - Viagra Claim | FactCheck.org

Angle’s Blame Game, Reprise | FactCheck.org

Not that truh matters mind you.
Click to expand...

So a nut beat the majority leader in the debate. That tells me he should not be majority leader
 
ptif219 said:
So a nut beat the majority leader in the debate. That tells me he should not be majority leader
Click to expand...

Won't argue with that, but that doesn't make a nut any better for the country. We the people seem to have failed in Nevada to field a viable candidate.
 
Boo Radley said:
Won't argue with that, but that doesn't make a nut any better for the country. We the people seem to have failed in Nevada to field a viable candidate.
Click to expand...

Agian a freshman senator does not have the power the majority leader has.
 
That Minimum Standards Rule (idea) has been sorely tested several times - for example - Alphonse D'amato (R-NY) William Scott(R-Va) Larry Craig (R-Id) James East (R-NC) Ted Kennedy (c.1962) and I've heard Akaka from Hawaii at present isn't exactly a Mensa candidate.
 
Boo Radley said:
Won't argue with that, but that doesn't make a nut any better for the country. We the people seem to have failed in Nevada to field a viable candidate.
Click to expand...


Hasn't stopped you libs from re electing nuts like Kusinsch, Sanders, and the whole cast of Star Wars barroom scene you call reps has it?


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
Hasn't stopped you libs from re electing nuts like Kusinsch, Sanders, and the whole cast of Star Wars barroom scene you call reps has it?


j-mac
Click to expand...

Well, now there's an argument. If one side has a nutter, then we have to have our own nutter. Airborne!!!!

Well, that'll certainly be good for the country. :rolleyes:
 
ptif219 said:
Agian a freshman senator does not have the power the majority leader has.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter. That person will still be representing and acting. We can't win as a country by this choice.
 
Angle is an Easy Target for some because the Tea Party syndrome prevailed in Nevada as well as at least 3 other Races for the Senate. Two weeks left and it's a Coin flip as to who Wins in Nevada, but just like the Kentucky race with a GOP edge but a dubious Rand Paul running - the Left and their Allies in the 4th Estate have focused totally because these 2 races are still salvageable and so is a Democrat Senate Majority.
 
Boo Radley said:
Doesn't matter. That person will still be representing and acting. We can't win as a country by this choice.
Click to expand...

So want a nut as majority leader and that is better than a freshman senator that has no power and could more easily be defeated the next election. You logic makes no sense to me.
 
Ned Racine said:
Angle is an Easy Target for some because the Tea Party syndrome prevailed in Nevada as well as at least 3 other Races for the Senate. Two weeks left and it's a Coin flip as to who Wins in Nevada, but just like the Kentucky race with a GOP edge but a dubious Rand Paul running - the Left and their Allies in the 4th Estate have focused totally because these 2 races are still salvageable and so is a Democrat Senate Majority.
Click to expand...

The dem majority will be less in Janurary.
 
ptif219 said:
So want a nut as majority leader and that is better than a freshman senator that has no power and could more easily be defeated the next election. You logic makes no sense to me.
Click to expand...

No, I think I've stated clearly I think we should have done a better job getting better choices. I have clearly stated we don't seem to win regardles sof who wins the election. We, or Nevada, loses either way.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, I think I've stated clearly I think we should have done a better job getting better choices. I have clearly stated we don't seem to win regardles sof who wins the election. We, or Nevada, loses either way.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Get rid of Reid and this country wins
 
Boo Radley said:
Like I said, Nevada and thus the country loses no matter who wins.
Click to expand...

If it stops Obama agenda, and the agenda from fringe liberals now seen co opting the democrat party, then the country does indeed win.


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
If it stops Obama agenda, and the agenda from fringe liberals now seen co opting the democrat party, then the country does indeed win.


j-mac
Click to expand...

Like I said, you put partisan winning over the country. I won't ask what the Obama agenda is, as I'm sure it's just mopre of the Beckish American non-thinker hyperbolic nonsense.
 
ptif219 said:
No they win when that nutcase is no longer majority leader
Click to expand...

No, that also means the one representing them, bring things to their state, now has no power to do so. Anyway you look at it, they lose.
 
Boo Radley said:
Like I said, you put partisan winning over the country. I won't ask what the Obama agenda is, as I'm sure it's just mopre of the Beckish American non-thinker hyperbolic nonsense.
Click to expand...

You hate whom you can't argue.....

j-mac
 
Boo Radley said:
No, that also means the one representing them, bring things to their state, now has no power to do so. Anyway you look at it, they lose.
Click to expand...

No they win by not having Reid there. As for not getting more of our tax dollars means we all win
 
Boo Radley said:
?????

Why would anyone argue with stupidity?
Click to expand...

We do with you
JC-hysterical.gif
JC-ROFL.gif
 
Boo Radley said:
?????

Why would anyone argue with stupidity?
Click to expand...

Good God man, stop with the Allensky stuff will ya? If Beck presents arguments that you just can't defeat, then admit it, I would hold far more respect than the childish tact you take here.

j-mac
 
Just to point out here - that where Cadre's of Reliable Party Line Voters still do exist is among traditional Democrats MOSTLY. Some old line Blue Collar types still with massive resentments against those in the Corporate Suites for Generations and among Many Blacks and still (though diminishing) among Elderly Jews in NY/NJ & Florida. Individuals who might be comfortable per say but still ONLY recall tough times 70+ years ago in camped conditions in NYC or Philadelphia. These are descendants of various Needle workers/ Garment Workers etc. who have strong Union sentiments and think Rich Poor ad nauseum even if it no longer apllies to them or any of their Upper Middle Class Children. Grand Children/Great Grand Children etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom