Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy leg

  1. #1
    Debate MMA
    Prof. Peabody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    07-30-12 @ 11:42 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,361

    Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy leg

    Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy legislation - Yahoo! News

    Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy legislation

    Amanda Carey - The Daily Caller Amanda Carey - The Daily Caller – Mon Oct 4, 1:54 am ET

    The political winds do not bode well for renewable energy and climate change policy.

    Sure, President Obama told Rolling Stone that “we’re going to stay on this [energy policy] because it is good for our economy, it’s good for our national security, and, ultimately, it’s good for our environment,” but what does it matter if members of Congress don’t feel the same passion to pass an Obama-style energy plan?

    Advocates for cap and trade legislation spent an agonizing summer watching the Kerry-Liebermann bill go up in flames in the Senate. Despite the massive lobbying by environmental groups and the fact that Democrats hold a majority in Congress, cap and trade died in the Senate for the fourth time since 2003.

    Last year, the House did manage to narrowly pass their version of cap and trade – also known as Waxman-Markey – but that bill got so bogged down with exemptions and concessions for utilities and oil companies that its net impact was less than ideal for most environmental advocates.

    I am confused as to how the Democrats energy policy is "good" for the economy. It will surely raise prices on consumers who will then have much less money to spend and stimulate the economy by purchasing manufactured goods.
    Back in the 1970's Liberals wizzed and moaned over Nuclear Power. Carter and the Democrats steered us toward coal to break the grip from foreign oil. Today, they propose making the public pay for their bad decision called "cap and trade". France went the Nuclear Power route and today produces 85% of their power with clean non CO2 emitting Nuclear Power. I can't think of a single reason we should listen to them again with their energy policy. Can you?
    "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

  2. #2
    Guru
    Councilman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Riverside, County, CA.
    Last Seen
    11-04-11 @ 10:16 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,454
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy

    If this stops the Cap and Trade nonsense it will help along with the much needed roll back of the "Obama I don't Care about your Health Plan" that will rape the citizens & economy then it's a wonderful thing.

    As I said before: The Environmentally ill movement is not about
    saving anything any more except their cash
    machines the heads of these money pits do
    very well by and never have to lift a damn finger
    because the rank and file who get out raise hell

    and even risk jail on occasion are all volunteers,
    who still think they are out fighting for mother
    nature, when in fact that hasn't been the case i
    n many years.

    Look at the pay just a few CEO's I listed all get
    and keep in mind the Average American worker
    is about, $32,140 each year.

    This makes the cushy jobs look a whole lot less
    than being a some idealistic altruistic noble
    cause an clearly all about the Benjamins to
    me. And all the facts showing widespread
    manipulation of facts from the about 11 found
    in Gores In-Convenient propaganda film to all
    the emails leaked or stolen ans so much more
    I really do wonder how those like Obama with
    his agenda to sink the economy so he can push
    his Socialist/Marxist agenda can actually get up
    with a straight face ans lie his ass off about it
    time and again knowing that many of know he's
    full of sight up to his brown eyes.

    Environmental Defense Fund
    Budget: $25.4 million
    Staff: 160
    Members: 300,000
    Salary of CEO: $262,000, including benefits

    National Audubon Society
    Budget: $44.9 million
    Staff: 300
    Members: 550,000
    CEO Salary: More than $180,000 including benefits

    National Wildlife Federation
    Budget: $80 million
    Staff: 600
    Members: 5 million
    CEO salary: More than $180,000 including benefits

    National Resources Defense Council
    Budget: $27.5 million
    Staff: 172
    Members: 350,000
    CEO salary: More than $200,000, including benefits

    The Nature Conservancy
    Budget: $337 million
    Staff: 1,200
    Members: 720,000 individuals; 220 corporations
    Salary of CEO: More than $196,000, including
    benefits

    We need to have systems put in place that are based on reality and facts and done logically so as not to screw over the economy with scare tactics ans fake or faulty science.

  3. #3
    Sage
    samsmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,316
    Blog Entries
    37

    Re: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy

    Quote Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post
    Back in the 1970's Liberals wizzed and moaned over Nuclear Power. Carter and the Democrats steered us toward coal to break the grip from foreign oil. Today, they propose making the public pay for their bad decision called "cap and trade". France went the Nuclear Power route and today produces 85% of their power with clean non CO2 emitting Nuclear Power. I can't think of a single reason we should listen to them again with their energy policy. Can you?
    Is France's nuclear power industry private or nationalized?

  4. #4
    Guru
    Morality Games's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Last Seen
    05-24-16 @ 10:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    3,733

    Re: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy

    Quote Originally Posted by Councilman View Post
    If this stops the Cap and Trade nonsense it will help along with the much needed roll back of the "Obama I don't Care about your Health Plan" that will rape the citizens & economy then it's a wonderful thing.

    As I said before: The Environmentally ill movement is not about
    saving anything any more except their cash
    machines the heads of these money pits do
    very well by and never have to lift a damn finger
    because the rank and file who get out raise hell

    and even risk jail on occasion are all volunteers,
    who still think they are out fighting for mother
    nature, when in fact that hasn't been the case i
    n many years.

    Look at the pay just a few CEO's I listed all get
    and keep in mind the Average American worker
    is about, $32,140 each year.

    This makes the cushy jobs look a whole lot less
    than being a some idealistic altruistic noble
    cause an clearly all about the Benjamins to
    me. And all the facts showing widespread
    manipulation of facts from the about 11 found
    in Gores In-Convenient propaganda film to all
    the emails leaked or stolen ans so much more
    I really do wonder how those like Obama with
    his agenda to sink the economy so he can push
    his Socialist/Marxist agenda can actually get up
    with a straight face ans lie his ass off about it
    time and again knowing that many of know he's
    full of sight up to his brown eyes.

    Environmental Defense Fund
    Budget: $25.4 million
    Staff: 160
    Members: 300,000
    Salary of CEO: $262,000, including benefits

    National Audubon Society
    Budget: $44.9 million
    Staff: 300
    Members: 550,000
    CEO Salary: More than $180,000 including benefits

    National Wildlife Federation
    Budget: $80 million
    Staff: 600
    Members: 5 million
    CEO salary: More than $180,000 including benefits

    National Resources Defense Council
    Budget: $27.5 million
    Staff: 172
    Members: 350,000
    CEO salary: More than $200,000, including benefits

    The Nature Conservancy
    Budget: $337 million
    Staff: 1,200
    Members: 720,000 individuals; 220 corporations
    Salary of CEO: More than $196,000, including
    benefits

    We need to have systems put in place that are based on reality and facts and done logically so as not to screw over the economy with scare tactics ans fake or faulty science.
    1. Systems are implemented by people.

    2. People tend to be unresponsive to logical arguments.

    People are exploiting climate change to make money, but that doesn't mean much in light of the fact other people are downplaying climate change to make money. The climate change movement was never widely celebrated for its altruism, just its cause.

    But putting that aside, you are reducing the complexity of the issue. Since climate change is at least theoretically a development which requires the full attention of a certain group of people, those people would have to form organizations and receive some compensation for their labor. Are you suggesting that if the people urging action on climate change aren't altruistic then their calls for action are invalid? That itself isn't a logical premise.
    Last edited by Morality Games; 10-11-10 at 03:29 AM.
    If you notice something good in yourself, give credit to God, not to yourself, but be certain the evil you commit is always your own and yours to acknowledge.

    St. Benedict

  5. #5
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy

    Quote Originally Posted by samsmart View Post
    Is France's nuclear power industry private or nationalized?
    Quasi. France provides an exceptionally large amount of public financing. Rarely is this ever brought up. My problem with Nuclear is that taxpayers are likely going to be tapped to finance at least some of these projects. With the average nuclear loan (or guarantee) in excess of $2 billion apiece (yes, BILLION), nuclear power is frankly anything but "free market." And that's not counting the subsidies nuclear gets per kilowatt.
    And France subsidizes the bejeezus out of its industry.

    France's Nuclear "Miracle" is More Fantasy that Fact - The Hill's Congress Blog
    Hooked on Subsidies | Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren | Cato Institute: Commentary

    It is hard to be a consistent limited government conservative and support nuclear power.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  6. #6
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,751

    Re: Midterm election results could mean bad news for climate change, renewable energy

    Quote Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
    Quasi. France provides an exceptionally large amount of public financing. Rarely is this ever brought up. My problem with Nuclear is that taxpayers are likely going to be tapped to finance at least some of these projects. With the average nuclear loan (or guarantee) in excess of $2 billion apiece (yes, BILLION), nuclear power is frankly anything but "free market." And that's not counting the subsidies nuclear gets per kilowatt.
    And France subsidizes the bejeezus out of its industry.

    France's Nuclear "Miracle" is More Fantasy that Fact - The Hill's Congress Blog
    Hooked on Subsidies | Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren | Cato Institute: Commentary

    It is hard to be a consistent limited government conservative and support nuclear power.
    I wonder how their approval process compares to ours. I know a huge part of the costs of a US plant is they all have to be individually designed and approved, and the red tape for that can take years. We could definitely bring down the costs by streamlining the process.

    And, really, we don't have any other choice. Wind and solar power are nifty and all, but they're going to lose out to sheer volume, and they can't be relied on 100% of the time. Climate change issues aside, we have to replace the vast majority of our fossil fuels with something else eventually, because those fossil fuels are not an unlimited resource. Nuclear power is the only source that reasonably can fill that volume. There's enough uranium around to last basically forever, especially if we reprocess the waste.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •