The CEO to employee ratio of pay increases every year. But we argue that they deserve more than us. That's fine. But not a proportional increase to the average worker's salary. More for them and less for us is not OK. Does anyone get this concept. I'm not saying more for them is bad...I'm saying more for them, while we see less is.
We look at these statistics and argue hard work, no work, education blah blah.
Because Jim and Alice Walton work 200,000 times harder than I do. Or maybe they were educated 200,000 times longer at a school 200,000 times better than Marquette University.