One thing is missing on all this blathering/bloviating; guess what it is?
Why, the subject we were discussing… OF COURSE. The fact is, that I used the site that you seem to think is dead on factual, plus I even linked to where the info is, rather than point and say its over there somewhere, go find it.
I come into this 121 page thread, again, at post #1186, disputing your assertion that “The economic numbers say differently. “Which was your answer to Moot regarding the bush tax-cuts. Where I supplied a couple of bea links in support of my post.
In your rebuttal, you say” Not sure exactly what you are looking at because not only did GDP go up after the tax cuts and an increase in GDP increases tax revenue as does the tax cuts increase the number of taxpayers. “
What I was looking at was,and what I provided a link to was BEA.GOV. What I was pointing at was line 10,on the NIPA table in my BEA.GOV link. The data on the that table clearly shows that economic growth, in real GDP, goes down when taxes are cut. It also shows that not only does economic growth go down ,it shows our national debt goes up . Better skip you next civics class and spend the money on an Rosetta Stone course studying Chinese.
The next few post you dedicated to trying to change the subject to anything but what we were discussing which culminated into this rambling post that has every talking point that happened to craw thru the ole dome while you were typing.
In post #1201 you say, “” If, as you say, you stand by your statement lets have a look at your bea.gov site and compare it to my bea.gov site, so we can see where the fault lies. Do we have a deal?I stand by my statement and I suggest you go to bea.gov and learn a few things.