It doesn't matter if you perceive marriage as a privilege or a right. Marriage is a contract and the rights associated with it all have to do with life, liberty, and property. You can argue that it doesn't but that is simply a denial of reality.
That's impossibly weak. If your statement has any real substance you'd not have to resort to the petty, deluded, petulant 'you're just dumb if you dont see it' fallacy.
Until you do MUCH better than that, my statement stands.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled in Loving v. Virginia that marriage is a fundamental right.
Wait - I'm sorry - didn't you just say that "It doesn't matter if you perceive marriage as a privilege or a right?" Why then do you have the petty, deluded need to show that marriage is a right?
In any event:
Its something that exists only bevause the state created in and granted it. Thus, it is privilige.
Your petty, deluded, sophomoroic appeal to authority only illustrates your utter lack of ability to otherwise support your petty, deluded argument.
That means that Supreme Court precedent overrules your petty deluded opinion on that matter.
Rights are not granted by the state, prviliges are. By the very nature of rights, nothing granted by the state can be a right. Nothing can change this.
The Supreme Court doesnt overrule reality, so another petty, deluded appeal to authority fails. Sorry.
So I ask for the fifth time....
Your petty, deluded question rests on an demonstrably petty, deluded, unsound premise, and as such, is meaningless.
There is no due process issue as no one is deprived of life, liberty or property, and there is no EP issue as everyone is held to the same legal standad.