• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Assailants stab, beat Christian worshippers outside of Indonesia's capital

I see...so...1.3 billion Muslims cant be ALL bad...except...Well...pretty much all of the Wahabbists...but...you cant blame one for the other. OK...but then lets not pretend it is 1.3 billion peaceful 'moderate' non violent muslims then. SO...Im guessing...a good chunk of those Indonesians...Pakistanis...Saudis...taliban, of course the Iranians... a bunch of Muslim extremists in Chechnya...a few thousand in the Philipines...

but just a few...not like...you know...a LOT...and the 'good' Muslims shouldnt be mixed in with the bad nor should they be responsible to call out the bad...so...that 1.3 billion...conservative guess...how many would YOU describe as 'moderate'? And are the moderates the ones that DONT protest when someone draws a cartoon of Muhammed? threaten to kill people over the threat of a book burning?

You would think if it was such a small minority, that the remainder would squash them like a bug, but alas... no bug squashing has occurred, only an expansion and increase in aggression.

http://www.herbcohenonline.com/PDF/FINAL App-7 Terrorism and Media.pdf
http://www.herbcohenonline.com/PDF/UNDERSTANDING_ISLAM.pdf

.
 
I am trying not to crack up here. Have you read the Bible? lol I know you said you were not a practicing Christian, but the Bible has all kinds of stuff like this in it.


It does. But I say this again, until it permeates:

1. Islam's unique because the ordainments to massacre Jews, oppress Christians and kill other Muslims for being peaceful come straight from the 'prophet'. These commands are meant to be unchangeable, with Islam unreformable. Spot the difference!

2. We've done bloody well in the West basing our culture and law on basic Christian principles. The Bible is sworn on in court and Jesus has no black, Adolf Hitler-style back history to show him up.

3. Muslims still have a huge problem with terrorism and other extremism and supremacism, because they indeed lack things like The Reformation, New Testament, Archbishops recommended by the Prime Minister and appointed by the monarch, open and constant critical scrutiny of the denominations, a distinct lack of national leaders ordering people to kill for Jesus holding them in check... the list goes on!
 
Poor peoples situation resorting to terror activities has less to do with your so called "Socio-economic" problems than it does a lack of freedom.


j-mac

I'll just point out that a lack of freedom comes under the socio bit of socio-economic, I was using blanket term 'cause I was hoping to avoid nitpicking of the terms I used.

And as for your first quote box, I do not blame America, I do not support giving out money for global warming, and I agree that democracy needs to be spread.

And the second link is quite interesting.
 
As reported across the Muslim world:



And then what do they do to a good Samaritan? Why, just take a plank to her head because she is a Christian.

And these people have been terrorizing Christians for months with the police turning the other cheek.

Muslim Outrage Meter: 0.0
(Note: the Muslim Outrage Meter regarding Christians has parameters from 0.00 to 0.00)

.

That's what happens when you institutionalize religious intolerance. Another reason we should always fight and strive to keep free the exercise and practice of religion.
 
I'll just point out that a lack of freedom comes under the socio bit of socio-economic, I was using blanket term 'cause I was hoping to avoid nitpicking of the terms I used.

Ok, fair enough, I guess I just get used to in this country the argument stemming from a standpoint of guilt of being relatively wealthy Americans, and that causing those that have not to become terrorists. It really is a lame stance, but I see you weren't saying that all together though so. :2wave:

And as for your first quote box, I do not blame America, I do not support giving out money for global warming, and I agree that democracy needs to be spread.

GW is the largest redistribution of wealth scheme to ever hit the world. this is why the UN is trying so hard to keep the mask on the hoax.

And the second link is quite interesting.

Yep, it is.

j-mac
 
Socio-Political and Economic forces, you combine a poor, illiterate population with an extremist view and give them a common enemy, 40 years ago the communists were doing it, today you have islamists, as well as any number of separatists and political ideologue forces world wide, in all the cases, it is not the ideology that provides the motivation, it is simply a uniting factor, and then you have the nuts like Mengistu or Khomeini steer the forces in the directions they want it to go.

Negative. Please do your homework
 
It does. But I say this again, until it permeates:

1. Islam's unique because the ordainments to massacre Jews, oppress Christians and kill other Muslims for being peaceful come straight from the 'prophet'. These commands are meant to be unchangeable, with Islam unreformable. Spot the difference!

2. We've done bloody well in the West basing our culture and law on basic Christian principles. The Bible is sworn on in court and Jesus has no black, Adolf Hitler-style back history to show him up.

3. Muslims still have a huge problem with terrorism and other extremism and supremacism, because they indeed lack things like The Reformation, New Testament, Archbishops recommended by the Prime Minister and appointed by the monarch, open and constant critical scrutiny of the denominations, a distinct lack of national leaders ordering people to kill for Jesus holding them in check... the list goes on!

Unlike the West, which was shaped in its development by the Renaissance,
Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution these pivotal events barely penetrated the land
of Islam
. Moreover, unlike Christianity that since the Reformation has continually
updated itself and adapted to changing conditions, Islam remained a religion of the Dark
Ages. For the most part, the 7th
century Koran was still taught as immutable
, since it is
the Word of Allah exactly as the Prophet received it. In this sense it is different from any
of the world’s other holy books
that were created by human authors many years after the
deaths of the prophets involved and then were edited, revised and added to by disciples.

If as President Bush said, “the war on terrorism will be fought on many fronts”,
then one of them should be sustained political pressure on our so-called allies to change
their ways
. For in reality the roots of international terrorism may not be in Islam or even
the clash of civilizations, but in our association with dysfunctional Arab regimes who
have spawned violent internal opposition. Instead of dealing with this resentment and
rage themselves, they have conveniently deflected this frustration and fury against the
United States.

http://www.herbcohenonline.com/PDF/UNDERSTANDING_ISLAM.pdf

What I see with most discussions about terrorists and Islam is a boat load of ignorance and appeasement. Which will result in more deaths and violence.

If we had informed masses in the west and put massive pressure on these regimes... we might have a chance of moving them out of the 7th century... and living in peace.

.
 
Last edited:
Howzabout a proper refutation?

I withdraw the poor, illiterate part in light of what J-mac posted, so you can proceed to refute the rest if you want.

Ok, fair enough, but lets wait for Jet to chime in
 
That's what happens when you institutionalize religious intolerance. Another reason we should always fight and strive to keep free the exercise and practice of religion.

Hold on to your robes Ikari....I agree with you here.


j-mac
 
Why is it fine for you to use the power of 1.4 Billion as a number to defend those, then turn and tell me they are not a monolith when it is your turn to explain why they remain silent in the face of murders bastardizing their religion?


j-mac

because it doesnt conveniently FIT if you make it go both ways...why is that so hard to see? :roll:
 
Vance, those are not considered terror attacks, but the Islamic method of delivering diplomatic messages.

.

Ah! I will consider myself 'reeductated!' ;)
 
Why is it fine for you to use the power of 1.4 Billion as a number to defend those, then turn and tell me they are not a monolith when it is your turn to explain why they remain silent in the face of murders bastardizing their religion?


j-mac

Both are saying the same thing, that Muslims are not a homogeneous group, saying 1.3999 billion or whatever number you choose of Muslims that are not violent is not a contradiction of saying that they are not responsible for the actions of the extremist ones on the other side of the world.
 
Hold on to your robes Ikari....I agree with you here.


j-mac

I don't wear robes, very inconvenient for motorcycles. But as it relates to the topic, I think it's another shining example of the dangers and pitfalls of theocracy. Once people can be freed from government encroachment over their religion, the religions can change and adapt to allow peaceful coexistence. The ME it's hard to see this because the most extreme and violent portions of their religions have been institutionalized through their theocracy, propaganda, and information control so that the governments and other agencies can work and manipulate the population to bring about their desired results.

I really don't think there is anything fundamental to Islam which couldn't allow it to coexist in a nation with other religions. It's just a religion run by people, and we've seen religions run by people which can be violent or which can be peaceful; so it's functionally well within the land of the reachable.
 
In America, this is known as gay bashing. Who says that bigots who attack transvestites have to be Christian? At least, here in America, there are hate crime laws designed to tamp down this kind of hate. The Muslims, according to your own link:

1) Want to shutter bars in their neighborhoods.

2) Beat up gays, and other people they consider immoral.

3) Attack those who they consider blasphemous.

But you make it appear that the attacks are because the victims are Christians. Don't you feel that this is not the real story here? Why try to make it look like something it's not? This is about religious extremism, and extremists in the world have a lot in common, no matter what religion they are.

That's the problem with ANY extremist. However, Christianity doesn't spread by the sword. Those who try don't have any supporting theology, and are widely renounced and fought. Phelps is always held up here as an example. He's a total whackjob with about 30 followers, in the WHOLE WORLD. He can't launch a global conflict. Islam is different. It has a theology that says if you're not part of the game, you get taxed, converted, or killed. As long as you carry a bigger sword they leave you alone somewhat. History has proven that. It's a religion of conversion. Radical Christians are irritating, but they don't feel justified in their theology that they can kill anyone not like them.
 
Both are saying the same thing, that Muslims are not a homogeneous group, saying 1.3999 billion or whatever number you choose of Muslims that are not violent is not a contradiction of saying that they are not responsible for the actions of the extremist ones on the other side of the world.

No it isn't really....the example of Fred Phelps has been thrown out here, as well as those that let their beliefs overcome their own morality in killing abortion docs. Neither example is remained silent by the Christian community. Both are denounced publicly. Why don't Muslims do the same?


j-mac
 
It does. But I say this again, until it permeates:

1. Islam's unique because the ordainments to massacre Jews, oppress Christians and kill other Muslims for being peaceful come straight from the 'prophet'. These commands are meant to be unchangeable, with Islam unreformable. Spot the difference!

2. We've done bloody well in the West basing our culture and law on basic Christian principles. The Bible is sworn on in court and Jesus has no black, Adolf Hitler-style back history to show him up.

3. Muslims still have a huge problem with terrorism and other extremism and supremacism, because they indeed lack things like The Reformation, New Testament, Archbishops recommended by the Prime Minister and appointed by the monarch, open and constant critical scrutiny of the denominations, a distinct lack of national leaders ordering people to kill for Jesus holding them in check... the list goes on!

Not only are they not uniqe, both books are open to interpretation. Permeates? Christianity has already had its share of atrocities. The reason that it has changed is that slowly as secular law becomes more and more accepted, people followed the law. Even then, Thomas Jefferson said, "although we are free by the law, we are not so in practice. Public opinion erects itself into an inquisition, and exercises its office with as much fanaticism as fans the flames of an Auto-da-fé.” (burning of heretics). All groups will take their philosophy, religion, whatever to extremes if they are not kept in check with laws that are unbiased for or against religion. I laugh when they talk about bringing Democracy to some of these countries, as if that is going to fix their problems.


I think blaming all this on religion is too simplistic.

There is also the reality of blowback. YouTube - Terrorism: Ron Paul vs. Giuliani @ SC Debate
Even in the case of the OP I think Chrisitnaity applies, because they associate it with their troubles.

I think there are so many reason why they have so many problems over there. I read this book a year or so ago and I was delighted to hear the author on NPR.
(It would be nice if people read the whole thing, but this part is just about suicide in Islam and these extremist groups)



Journalist Lawrence Wright's 'Trip To Al-Qaeda' : NPR
GROSS:
Now, you talk in your documentary "My Trip to Al-Qaeda," about the Quran and what the Quran has to say about suicide. And you said that the Quran says, do not kill yourself and that the punishment for suicide is to spend eternity killing yourself with the same instrument you used to die. What insights do you have about how al-Qaida managed to make suicide a holy thing, where these, you know, beautiful things happen to you as a result of it and you become a hero in the eyes of the prophet?
Mr. WRIGHT: Well, it was actually Ayman al-Zawahiri who pioneered this. He was the very first to use suicide bombers, even before the Palestinians did, in his attempts on political figures inside Egypt. He even pioneered the use of martyrdom videos. And after 1996, when he had blown up the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad, killing mainly Muslims, a lot of other Muslims were very angry with him and, you know, wanting to understand how can you justify that? And so he wrote a response to their queries. He compared the suicide bombers to the martyrs of Christianity.
There weren't very many examples he could draw upon from Islam because of this absolute prohibition within the Quran. And it's really ironic that it was Christian martyrs that became the basis of his argument.
The notion is that you are a guided missile. And the idea that you're going to be sacrificing yourself for a cause that's greater than you overcomes this kind of prohibition. It's sophistry. It's - in my opinion, many people don't really pay attention to the argument. I think that the young men that are drawn into al-Qaida with a goal of committing suicide have other causes driving them than simply Zawahiri's legalistic argument about how you can kill yourself and get away with it.
I think that, you know, it's almost a total ban on the idea of suicide in Muslim countries. It's completely taboo. So if you are feeling despairing and you are the type of person that in another society might want to kill yourself, how do you go about that? Well, for one thing, al-Qaida offers you a route to paradise, at least they say so.
GROSS: So you think that a lot of people who join al-Qaida to become suicide bombers are clinically depressed?
Mr. WRIGHT: Oh, I think there's no doubt about it. And, you know, the studies that have been done about the young men drawn into these groups typically show them to be fairly well-educated. You know, especially, you know, the early leaders of al-Qaida, you know, professional men, well-educated, some of them not even very religious. So, you know, what is it? You know, what are all the elements? And if you're going to try to pin down a single word about what is it that characterizes the drive into this kind of radical reaction, I think a word might be despair. Because there are many different rivers that lead into despair, you know, there's poverty. There's political repression. There's gender apartheid. You know, there's a sense of a cultural loss. There's religious fanaticism. All of these elements are present in many different Muslim countries in varying degree.
 
Last edited:

The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups).

The above according to the report of terrorism in the U.S. Notice the absence of mention of right wing militias in the report. We could say some of the remaining 16% could include right wing militia types but this is incredible. Remember when Janet Napolitino declared right wing extremists as the big threat when she was appointed Secretary of Homeland Security. I guess she wasn't up on her statistics. How about those Latino terrorists.
 


Now come on...dont you pretty much HAVE to admit...these are 'moderate' Muslims???
 
The remaining 94% were from other groups (42% from Latinos, 24% from extreme left wing groups, 7% from extremist Jews, 5% from communists, and 16% from all other groups).

The above according to the report of terrorism in the U.S. Notice the absence of mention of right wing militias in the report. We could say some of the remaining 16% could include right wing militia types but this is incredible. Remember when Janet Napolitino declared right wing extremists as the big threat when she was appointed Secretary of Homeland Security. I guess she wasn't up on her statistics. How about those Latino terrorists.

So your point is we must focus on latinos and not afghanistan? How come it seems to me there is more bickering than actual logical arguments.
And about Napolitano....ONE guy (a right wing "preacher") almost started world war 3 thanks to his utter disrespect for over 1 billion people's religion.
But he has a constitutional right. I forgot. A Muslim who wants to have a mosque and 20 odd floors of community facilities after paying for the building and being approved by the city deserve outrage. Terry Jones has a right. Muslims do not. They all want to kill us. Greensboro church has a right. Muslims do not. They all want to kill us.

So Terry Jones wanted to burn Quarans. It's his right. It's just a book.
Muslims can not have a mosque and pray. It is not thier right. It is not respectful. They want to kill us.
Muslims burning bibles in the US? Also not thier right. Only white people can do that in the US.
SICK.
 
No it isn't really....the example of Fred Phelps has been thrown out here, as well as those that let their beliefs overcome their own morality in killing abortion docs. Neither example is remained silent by the Christian community. Both are denounced publicly. Why don't Muslims do the same?


j-mac

They do. I've shown you many times that they did, you refuse to aknowledge it.

The only reason that Fred Phelps is denounced is because he's Anti-Troop...

His views on Homosexuality aren't that out there in the bible belt...

Sarah Palin refuses to aknowledge that Abortion Clinic Bombers are terrorists... SHE'S A TERRORIST!!!!!
 
No it isn't really....the example of Fred Phelps has been thrown out here, as well as those that let their beliefs overcome their own morality in killing abortion docs. Neither example is remained silent by the Christian community. Both are denounced publicly. Why don't Muslims do the same?

j-mac

They do. You just don't care to listen.

Muslim attitudes towards terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A common complaint among non-Muslims is that Muslim religious authorities do not condemn terrorist attacks. The complaints often surface in letters to the editors of newspapers, on phone-in radio shows, in Internet mailing lists, forums, etc.

Actually, there are lots of fatwas and other statements issued which condemn attacks on innocent civilians. Unfortunately, they are largely ignored by newspapers, television news, radio news and other media outlets.
 
They do. You just don't care to listen.

Muslim attitudes towards terrorism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A common complaint among non-Muslims is that Muslim religious authorities do not condemn terrorist attacks. The complaints often surface in letters to the editors of newspapers, on phone-in radio shows, in Internet mailing lists, forums, etc.

Actually, there are lots of fatwas and other statements issued which condemn attacks on innocent civilians. Unfortunately, they are largely ignored by newspapers, television news, radio news and other media outlets.

And yet the best source you could come up with is Wikipedia? The REAL issue is when the many allow the few to define them by commission or omission, remain silent and do not police their own - well, they lose the right to bitch and moan
 
They do. I've shown you many times that they did, you refuse to aknowledge it.

The only reason that Fred Phelps is denounced is because he's Anti-Troop...

His views on Homosexuality aren't that out there in the bible belt...

Sarah Palin refuses to aknowledge that Abortion Clinic Bombers are terrorists... SHE'S A TERRORIST!!!!!

The more I read your writing, the more I'm convinced you see Christianity as the real threat to the "American way of life". I have no clue what pissed you off so bad to make you hate Christians so, but it truely makes me sad. You seem to fear Christians more than Muslims with respect to the security of the U.S.
 
Back
Top Bottom