I've made this point before, about Bush no less, that no one is under any obligation at all to answer or dispel the machinations of total idiots that happen to be thrown their way. Taking a refusal to deal with such moronic behavior as a sign of something OTHER than actually caring how one's time is spent falls under the category of confirmation bias; you hear what you want to hear, to hell with anyone who says different.
No, they dont.But, white folks, especially southerners fall under a different standard? That's what I thought.
See my last post
There have been Muslims who have denounced terrorist acts, they have all hedged their bets. Depending on WHO is being attacked, they say it is ok. That opinion is supported by, rather than refuted by their source documents, i.e. the Koran. A further difference is support among the populace. As long as Islamic terrorists limit their attacks to "INFIDELS", they have almost universal support and aid among your Islamic community. Only when they start hitting other Muslims (Sunni killing Sunni, Shi'a killing Shi'a) do they lose that community support.judged individually by Allah for their actions
How many times do I have to repeat myself? You have a confirmation bias.
I rest my case.Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuul****!
See my last post
Last edited by Laila; 08-31-10 at 09:00 PM.
They'll murder their sons, sisters, brothers, daughters and wives, strangers, infidels, and anyone else who they feel might be obstructing their path to eternal righteousness.
I can see why those who are born into Islam and have little knowledge of the outside world might fall for this nonsense but it's always a bit of a shock to see otherwise rational people falling for this craziness.