• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Beck, Palin Stress 'Honor' at Rally

You can be rich, successful, have a TV and radio show and still be humble.
Now Obama could never be humble, even if he was dirt poor. He doesn't have it in him, and Beck doesn't have a spec of arrogance.
They are complete opposites.

We're done here because it's so obvious that you're so far under his spell that you'd join him in Guyana if he asked you to.

He's a cult of personality and nothing more. Humility is not a word in his vocabulary. You seem like a nice person to me. I'm just sad that you're so fooled.
 
They stressed Christianity more than anything at the event. God is one thing, but focusing on Jesus isn't being very inclusive. w/e... I'm sure it was still pretty motivational for some.

Do you realize there were many different faiths there on stage?
I don't think most people get offended by God, Jesus, talk even if they don't have a particular faith. I know I don't.
Freedom of Religion not Freedom from Religion.
Besides, I'm sure most people knew Beck and knew he had a strong faith. That's probably one reason they decided to go.
Most were probably praying the 40 days before the event because he suggested it.
Yea, I know he is a little kooky, but he is also a breath of fresh air.
 
What on earth?

All base eleements of society are in decay?

Nice try...

I was looking at the black community only; the numbers are up across the board.
Isn't government assistance great?

Then you have this decay as described by Rev. Peterson:

Moral poverty cost blacks<BR>in New Orleans

Say a hurricane is about to destroy the city you live in. Two questions:

1. What would you do?

2. What would you do if you were black?

Sadly, the two questions don't have the same answer.

To the first: Most of us would take our families out of that city quickly to protect them from danger. Then, able-bodied men would return to help others in need, as wives and others cared for children, elderly, infirm and the like.

For better or worse, Hurricane Katrina has told us the answer to the second question. If you're black and a hurricane is about to destroy your city, then you'll probably wait for the government to save you.

This was not always the case. Prior to 40 years ago, such a pathetic performance by the black community in a time of crisis would have been inconceivable. The first response would have come from black men. They would take care of their families, bring them to safety, and then help the rest of the community. Then local government would come in.

Notice the time frame? 40-years.

That trade of 10 million votes was a bad one for all America and Americans. Especially those that follow the likes of Wright, Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan, and Obama.

So much decay in such a short time, and with so much government assistance.

.
 
Last edited:
We're done here because it's so obvious that you're so far under his spell that you'd join him in Guyana if he asked you to.

He's a cult of personality and nothing more. Humility is not a word in his vocabulary. You seem like a nice person to me. I'm just sad that you're so fooled.

Look up the word. It fits him. Maybe you wouldn't think so if you only catch a few minutes of him here and there.
He's not a cult personality. He has a lot of passion for his country. that's all.
I'm glad we're done here. I'm running out of good things to say about him and I don't want to have to start making things up.:)
 
Nice try...

I was looking at the black community only; the numbers are up across the board.
Isn't government assistance great?

Then you have this decay as described by Rev. Peterson:



Notice the time frame? 40-years.

That trade of 10 million votes was a bad one for all America and Americans. Especially those that follow the likes of Wright, Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan, and Obama.

So much decay in such a short time, and with so much government assistance.

.

Look at Chicago. Obama really helped the blacks while he was a community organizer there. Oh wait...
 
Look at Chicago. Obama really helped the blacks while he was a community organizer there. Oh wait...

Dd anyone ever discover which community he organized?

How's it doin'?

Did he do for that community what's he's done for the entire country?
 
Check the votes of who supported what from inception and get back to me.
Which President had the vision of Civil Rights legislation and which President used the bully pulpit and years in the House and Senate to get those votes after his predecessor was assassinated in Dallas, Texas November 22, 1963?

Get back to me when you figure that out. :roll:
 
Dd anyone ever discover which community he organized?

How's it doin'?

Did he do for that community what's he's done for the entire country?
ROTFLOL... he was so successful he quit.

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican - HUMAN EVENTS

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.


Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

...It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems.
More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

Ms. Rice is chairman of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA) and may be contacted at National Black Republican Association | National Black Republican Association.

Why Martin Luther King Was Republican - HUMAN EVENTS
 
Last edited:
Republicans then, are not republicans now. Straw man.

Parties change.
 
Republicans then, are not republicans now. Straw man.

Parties change.

Rrrrrrrrrrrrrright... we are now racist, bigot, homophobes...:roll:
It's not R's calling for Obama's nuts to be cut out because he spoke the truth once.

No straw man. History is history and facts are facts. You dismiss them because they blow a howitzer sized hole in the Dem Fairy Tale.

.
 
Last edited:
Republicans then, are not republicans now. Straw man.

Parties change.

That can certainly be true but there seems to be no clear evidence that the Democrats have more respect for minorities than do Republicans, though historically the Republicans have done more for the Black people.

In fact it seems clear that Democrats only use Blacks as an electoral base and if one of gets out of the Democratic line they are often called an ""Uncle Tom". SCJ Thomas went through this in a big way, and many other Blacks have suffered from Democrat harsh and uncivil resentments.
 
Last edited:
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrright... we are now racist, bigot, homophobes...:roll:
It's not R's calling for Obama's nuts to be cut out because he spoke the truth once.

No straw man. History is history and facts are facts. You dismiss them because they blow a howitzer sized hole in the Dem Fairy Tale.

.

Did he say that?
Parties change, as the culture changes. If you really want to try to paint the parties as being the same as they were 50 years ago, then you really don't understand how to analyze history.
 
Did he say that?
Parties change, as the culture changes. If you really want to try to paint the parties as being the same as they were 50 years ago, then you really don't understand how to analyze history.

He didn't, but let's not be coy. Dems try to paint Republicans as racists.
The race cardization has escalated since Obi has been in office, with his AG calling us "cowards".
In fact a few Libs here have tried to paint me as one and even tried more devious assaults.

I would love to hear a definition of what Jet means. Really. Have at it, I'm all eyes.

.
 
Last edited:
The parties changed after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sighed by LBJ. You bet they did.

Yeah, the Dems changed and got us involved in Vietnam and tried to spread American influence through the military:mrgreen: They also increased the budget deficit by spending a lot of money on the war. Ironic isn't it?
 
The parties changed after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sighed by LBJ. You bet they did.

How so, Pbrauer?

It was the Republicans who were iin the majority in voting for this bill and was opposed by moreso by the Democrats.

The original House version:[10]

* Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%–39%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[11]

* Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%–34%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%–18%)

The Senate version:[10]

* Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%–31%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[10]

* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%–37%)
* Republican Party: 136-35 (80%–20%)

Democrats such as George Wallace and Orville Faubus, and of course the late Robert Byrd, should be remembered for their Democratic party membership as well as their very public racism. Since then I've seen no evidence that the Democrats have changed all that much, except in their rhetoric and opportunistic propaganda.
 
He didn't, but let's not be coy. Dems try to paint Republicans as racists.
The race cardization has escalated since Obi has been in office, with his AG calling us "cowards".

I would love to hear a definition of what Jet means. Really. Have at it, I'm all eyes.

.

He said parties change, not that parties switch around the same views over, and over again. And I don't try to paint republicans as racist, most of my family is republican, why I would I try to paint them as racist?

And for heavens sake Obi Wan Kenobi isn't president. Stop taking acid.
 
Yeah, the Dems changed and got us involved in Vietnam and tried to spread American influence through the military:mrgreen: They also increased the budget deficit by spending a lot of money on the war. Ironic isn't it?

Quite right, Digsbe, and in fact it was the Democrats who got America involved in WWI, WWII, the Korean War and then Vietnam. It was a Republican who ended the Vietnam War, of course.
 
How so, Pbrauer?

It was the Republicans who were iin the majority in voting for this bill and was opposed by moreso by the Democrats.

The original House version:[10]

* Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%–39%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[11]

* Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%–34%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%–18%)

The Senate version:[10]

* Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%–31%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[10]

* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%–37%)
* Republican Party: 136-35 (80%–20%)

Democrats such as George Wallace and Orville Faubus, and of course the late Robert Byrd, should be remembered for their Democratic party membership as well as their very public racism. Since then I've seen no evidence that the Democrats have changed all that much, except in their rhetoric and opportunistic propaganda.

Read my post a few pages back about how it was a Northern, Southern divide between the Civil Rights act, not a Democratic, Republican divide.
 
He said parties change, not that parties switch around the same views over, and over again. And I don't try to paint republicans as racist, most of my family is republican, why I would I try to paint them as racist?

And for heavens sake Obi Wan Kenobi isn't president. Stop taking acid.

I use Obi because it's short. Just as I used Jet.
And how has who changed, that is what I would like to know... have at it it too of you like.
Your and Jets views ought to be interesting.

.
 
Quite right, Digsbe, and in fact it was the Democrats who got America involved in WWI, WWII, the Korean War and then Vietnam. It was a Republican who ended the Vietnam War, of course.

Are you saying we should have not gotten involved in World War I and World War II after being attacked at Pearl Harbor?
Did you know President Nixon campaigned on ending the war in Vietnam and yet over 20,000 of our service men died there.
 
He said parties change, not that parties switch around the same views over, and over again. And I don't try to paint republicans as racist, most of my family is republican, why I would I try to paint them as racist?

And for heavens sake Obi Wan Kenobi isn't president. Stop taking acid.

You mean that the Democratic party isn't as racist as it once was Your Star?

I quite agree, but it certainly didn't occur without a great deal of pressure from the Republican Party.

Since that time the Democrats have been painting the Republicans as "racists", and many new Democrats appear to have bought into that idea. These people, while probably being quite decent in many other areas, are not terribly bright.
 
Back
Top Bottom