The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
You claimed that all Planned Parenthoods were in minority neighborhoods. I pointed you to a page that adamantly proved that statement to be patently false.
Yet, you still claim to be right. Why? Why, in the face of facts that disprove your statement, do you continue to maintain that it's true?
If you had actually proven any point you make with a fact, then I might say, "Oh, you're right." And then alter my belief a little bit. For instance, were I you, after being proven wrong, might have said, "Okay, well not EVERY clinic is in poor minority neighborhoods. Maybe I exaggerated a little bit..." and then adjusted my argument down.
How do you maintain that view that you're right in face of actual facts that prove you wrong? It's a pretty amazing ability, I'll admit. It just lends you little credibility in debate.
Moderator's Warning: I am locking this thread until a mod not involved in the discussion can go over it and decide what to do with it. Be aware infractions may be incoming.