Your support for taxpayer funding of personal choice issues says a lot about you and your failure to understand personal responsibility. It is all feel good rhetoric when you believe a bureaucrat in D.C. can administer personal responsibility issues from a desk in D.C. Liberal social engineering starting with the Great Society have created most of the debt we have today as evidenced by the actual budget of the United States. Doubt you have ever read that budget. So when Glenn Beck takes on the Republicans you are silent but when he attacks the left he is demonized.
Beck's rally today brought hundreds of thousands of people to D.C. or to cites that actually broadcast the rally today and that just irritates people like you. That simply is liberal arrogance that cannot understand human behavior and people who truly love this country and the foundation upon which it was built. Anyone that gets in the way of the liberal ideology of bigger govt, involvement in personal responsibility issues, and devisive govt. has to be destroyed and that in a nutshell defines liberals and what is wrong with this country today.
Look, you got thanked and they don't even know that you just called me a, "faggot". Not, "gay", not, "alternate lifestyle", not, "homosexual", but, "faggot". Good job, driver.
If people don't want to be associated with Communists or Socialists than they should find something else to call themselves.
"Progressives" is such a silly and misleading term anyway. Communists, and Socialists, have never been "Progressive" in the original sense of the word.
And I don't hate Palin - that is what most cons keep claiming because they don't want to face the fact that she is a fake, more interested in money and fooling people into thinking she cares about their ideals for the country, so accusing those who oppose her of hate is a way to escape reality.
What about the ones where she has been found guilty? You seem to want to sweep those under the rug along with those that were dismissed. And you can't handle the facts. Your way of responding to facts is to say they are lies.If she runs for office then she will have to answer for those "allegations" most of which have been dismissed. I tend to let facts actual rule my beliefs not allegations. Wasn't it liberals who said, we need to wait for all the evidence to be aired before making judgment? Does that only apply to liberal causes or people that liberals support?
Considering you know nothing about me, I will just have to chuckle at your assumptions. You are spending a lot of time defending those same issues you claim surfaced back in 2008 - so, if you don't want to discuss Palin, why did you bring her up in the first place?You sure are spending a lot of time on issues that surfaced back in 2008. Your so called facts amount to allegations which have been dismissed. Not sure what the issue is here other than diversion from what is going on right now? Whether or not Palin loves money is irrelevant as she lives in the U.S. and thus is able to make as much money as she is capable of making. Sounds to me like a little class envy here.
That is so lame. Bush and Company had 6 years of total control (2001 - 2006). They did nothing in regards to health care, immigration reform, finance reform, etc. For you to blame Obama, who only came to the Senate in 2005, is so typical of conservatives who don't want to accept responsibility for the mess they put the country in.I have no problem blaming Bush but do so with actual facts, not opinions like you are doing. There is much I didn't like about Bush but he had a lot of help from Congress in creating the mess we have today including Obama in that Congress.
What a surprise, coming from a member of the party of "no".There is absolutely nothing that Obama has done that I support and results show that I was accurate in not supporting his agenda.
To ignore what led to the big mess and try to heap 8 years of Bush's ineptness on Obama is a typical right-wing spin and downright lie.Obama has a total Democrat Congress that is implementing his agenda. To say the mess we have today has nothing to do with that agenda is typical liberal spin and a downright lie.
That's only according to the spin-meister machine, however, we are still in recovery mode from the 8 years of totally failed policies. So much for you relying on facts.Republicans and Conservatives don't have to scamper around to "try" and put the blame on Obama, the results do that work for them. Obama policies have indeed flopped so all you can do is blame Bush.
Maybe you can tell me why a dishonest Bush, didn't share with Congress information that he received that might suggest there were no WMD's. Are these Democrats supposed to be mind readers?Maybe you can tell me how someone so stupid and dumb(Bush) was able to fool so many "intelligent"(Democrats) into passing the Iraq Resolution in a Democrat Controlled Senate?
Ever hear of the "filibuster"?Then tell me why that intellectually superior Democrat Party that controlled the Congress in 2007 on didn't do something to stop Bush from destroying the economy all buy himself?
In the 1960s, she finds, “extended-debate-related problems” — threatened or actual filibusters — affected only 8 percent of major legislation. By the 1980s, that had risen to 27 percent. But after Democrats retook control of Congress in 2006 and Republicans found themselves in the minority, it soared to 70 percent.
PostPartisan - Not your father's filibuster (or your mother's)
Ever heard of the rippling effect. Surely you didn't expect everything to happen all at once, unless you are very naive.Then tell me what Bush did to cause unemployment to rise every month of 2010 and to add 1.4 trillion more to the debt?
Yeah, I noticed you said that after you posted all that crap in defense of them. And your delusional assumption that you proved anyone wrong is so typical of conservative's fantasies.By the way this is the Glenn Beck thread and really has nothing to do with Bush, Palin or anyone of the masses attending that rally in D.C. Nice diversion though and thanks for allowing me the opportunity to prove your points wrong.
"I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends... that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them." --Adlai Stevenson, Politician
This is rich conservative, first you say to Glendathen in the second paragraph you give your. OPINION.“What I see from you are a lot of personal opinions that I believe are based upon ignorance “
” Your support for taxpayer funding of personal choice issues says a lot about you and your failure to understand personal responsibility. “
Last edited by Donc; 08-28-10 at 03:30 PM.
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
Margaret Sanger gave us The Negro Project which was designed to keep blacks from breeding, because they're an inferior people. And all you can say about that is her views are, "archaic"? I guess Hitler was just, "archaic".And Sanger did some great things for women, but - like many of our American ancestors - held views that we now consider archaic. Let's also recall that a lot of American heroes have significant flaws when it comes to views of things like race, the mentally ill, sex. I mean, our Founding Fathers were largely slave-owners. We can acknowledge the great things they did, but still be against slavery, can't we? Or should we condemn them for their racial views and reject everything positive they did?