Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

  1. #1
    Bohemian Revolutionary
    Demon of Light's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    03-07-17 @ 12:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    5,095

    Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

    A White House-created commission is considering proposals to raise the retirement age and take other steps to shore up the finances of Social Security, prompting key players to prepare for a major battle over the program's future.
    Journal Community

    The panel is looking for a mix of ideas that could win support from both parties, including concessions from liberals who traditionally oppose benefit cuts and from Republicans who generally oppose higher taxes, according to one member of the commission and several people familiar with its deliberations.

    In addition to raising the retirement age, which is now set to reach age 67 in 2027, specific cuts under consideration include lowering benefits for wealthier retires and trimming annual cost-of-living increases, perhaps only for wealthier retirees, people familiar with the talks said.
    Source: The Wall Street Journal

    These seems familiar to the Bush proposal only absent the option of voluntary investment that was misrepresented by opponents.
    "For what is Evil but Good-tortured by its own hunger and thirst?"
    - Khalil Gibran

  2. #2
    Sage
    Hicup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Last Seen
    12-07-17 @ 03:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    7,846

    Re: Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

    Quote Originally Posted by Demon of Light View Post
    Source: The Wall Street Journal

    These seems familiar to the Bush proposal only absent the option of voluntary investment that was misrepresented by opponents.
    Isn't that interesting. Another idea would be to scale back, and I mean really scale back public service employee pensions to that matching the private sector. How is it that a teacher, or service employee, on average, makes double, even triple what a military service-person can retire on, after 20 years? It doesn't make any sense? Or is that the military isn't unionized?


    Makes me sick to my stomach..

    Tim-
    “When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
    “Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher

  3. #3
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:22 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,315
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicup View Post
    Isn't that interesting. Another idea would be to scale back, and I mean really scale back public service employee pensions to that matching the private sector. How is it that a teacher, or service employee, on average, makes double, even triple what a military service-person can retire on, after 20 years? It doesn't make any sense? Or is that the military isn't unionized?


    Makes me sick to my stomach..

    Tim-
    Maybe because they are not retiring after 20 years? One of the benefits of being in the military as you can retire at age 38 and get a check once a month for the rest of your life.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  4. #4
    Guru
    Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Seen
    12-21-10 @ 05:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,063

    Re: Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

    Here's another idea,








































    QUIT SPENDING THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUND AND START MAKING IT A REAL FUND INSTEAD OF A SLUSH FUND.















    [/rant]
    There is no such thing as a “Natural Born Dual-Citizen“.

    Originally Posted by PogueMoran
    I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read.

  5. #5
    Sage
    Hicup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Last Seen
    12-07-17 @ 03:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    7,846

    Re: Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Maybe because they are not retiring after 20 years? One of the benefits of being in the military as you can retire at age 38 and get a check once a month for the rest of your life.
    Perhaps, but even if you factor in the difference between retirement ages , the Military dudes, and dudettes, still LOSE big time.


    Tim-
    “When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
    “Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •