I'll mention 2 scenarios and fused them together. What do you think the outcome would be?
1- We value freedom of expression, but the fact is, unless you severely hamper freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, etc., you can't prevent Imams and Mullahs from preaching what you don't want. If you dictate what can be preached and taught, you have to be able to enforce it.
2- Muslims outside of Muslim nations. In countries that espouse freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Unless you want the "radical" interpretations to flourish there, those populations will also have to be repressed in a manner that violates their civil rights in every western nation.