• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

President Obama comes out in support of Ground Zero mosque

Exactly my point. So ask yourself why don't they do that?

Fortunately or Unfortunately that is not for us to decide. But I think it will happen soon because of all this.


No, this is the construct that allows you to place those that oppose your naive view of this as somehow bigoted when they are not.

Oh please! If people weren't so afraid of muslims being terrorists, and could Differentiate between Islam and radical Islam, we couldn't be having this conversation.

Maybe that is how you see it, but I assure you that your "question" is an assertion, based in how you view those opposed to your POV.

Oh I see! So we're still making baseless accusations that the Imam may have known about 9/11? and we still can't prove it. Good to know, cheers :2wave:

If they continue to attempt to build a Mosque of conquest at Ground Zero, then I certainly hope so.

Opinion. Fear. Emotional argument.


Fear, and emotion are constructs that you are attributing to my argument which you seem to have trouble breaking, so you then just dismiss it under this absurd paradigm. Why don't you actually address the argument instead of your masked name calling, and obfuscation.

Please, this entire thing is about fear. People fear Islam. If they did not, we wouldn't care about this whole thing.

How much of the Twin Towers are rebuilt?

It's not across the street J-Mac, it will not "Tower Over" for gods sake, get a grip on reality here.

I know who's fault it is the twin towers are gone. Radical Islamists.

But I know it's not Islams fault nothing has been rebuilt there. Try again :cool:

Yeah, yeah....pfft! :roll: This is clap trap designed to silence opposition to this Cordoba house. The American people don't agree with you sir.

j-mac

Is it possible that the people can be wrong?
 
My apologies for asking this question ... and thereby breaking (back) into this thread, but:

Where is Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the Ground Zero Imam? Since the scheisse has hit the fan, Imam Rauf jetted off to the Middle East and cannot be reached for comment. Has anyone read any news stories of his where abouts? According to Claudia Rosett (Forbes Magazine), he was last seen in Abu Dhabi for a stop at a Wahhabist Mosque for prayers; all phone calls and emails from CNN, Forbes, FOX and others have gone unanswered. All attempts at interviews by Reuters about the money, bank statements and tax receipts by the Cordoba Initiative have gone unanswered as well.

If anyone has any information on this, I would be interested.

My apologies for breaking into the thread guys ....
 
Last edited:
Fortunately or Unfortunately that is not for us to decide. But I think it will happen soon because of all this.

I hope they don't build it there, it would be a nightmare, during, and after construction.


Oh please! If people weren't so afraid of muslims being terrorists, and could Differentiate between Islam and radical Islam, we couldn't be having this conversation.

Nonsense. As I already pointed out there are over a thousand Mosques nation wide. If we were so afraid then why haven't they been shuttered?

Oh I see! So we're still making baseless accusations that the Imam may have known about 9/11? and we still can't prove it. Good to know, cheers

he may have, he may not have. Neither can be proven. But I would lay out there that so far the Imam's actions in this mess have been little more than outright lies.

Opinion. Fear. Emotional argument.

Opinions come from a plethora of different places from different people. I think it is rather presumptuous of you to narrow it down to the neat little offensive box you do.

Please, this entire thing is about fear. People fear Islam. If they did not, we wouldn't care about this whole thing.

Could I not just as easily label you as complacent to radical Islam through an unwillingness to understand the threat that comes out of radical Islam? I think so.


It's not across the street J-Mac, it will not "Tower Over" for gods sake, get a grip on reality here.

It is 600 feet. Too close.

I know who's fault it is the twin towers are gone. Radical Islamists.

Congratulations. Then you also know that you will not make friends with them by prostrating yourself in front of them, right?

But I know it's not Islams fault nothing has been rebuilt there. Try again

Yeah? Who's fault is it then? I know, do you?

Is it possible that the people can be wrong?

Seems as though that is the only thing liberals can say when opinion goes against whatever they propose today? Healthcare takeover? Against 70%, DO IT ANYWAY! Finance Reform current existence? 70% Against, DO IT ANYWAY! NYC mosque? 65% Against, 'well the people are wrong, DO IT ANYWAY!

How long you libs think this will work with the American people?


j-mac
 
We all know damn well there is going to be trouble at that building. It will become everybody's favorite place to protest Muslims and maybe hurt them.

I'm having a hard time imaging how anything good can come from this. It's just a bad idea to build a Muslim church at that particular location and there should be nothing illegal about stopping it.
 
What the hell....

You know, like when I was a bill collector. "Do you want to pay the bill voluntarily, or do we need to pursue this through legal avenues?"
 
You can call it what ever the hell you want but the fact of the matter is that it is a large center that will be holding daily prayer rituals, it's a Mosque.

So when everybody was praying in the Twin Towers - did they become a church?
 
You're not listening, because I never said he wasn't entitled. I said he should have kept his mouth shut.

The leader of the free world should have kept his mouth shut? Why, because you say so??
 
One has to respect the sensitvity of others. Yes our constitution is our platform but anyone would have to question why INSIST on this location? The law does not require you to attend your mothers funeral but you should go anyway should you not?

Well, your question is certainly off-topic but wth, I'm up against that very scenario. I won't be attending my mother's funeral. And if you want to ask it honestly as opposed to trying to make a point - what if all of her other family is PRAYING I don't show up. Who shall I be sensitive to then?

Funerals are for the living, and sensitivity has nothing to do with it. A cultural center. Repeat after me, Cultural Center! is being built two. Blocks. Away.

Just leave them be.
 
Well, your question is certainly off-topic but wth, I'm up against that very scenario. I won't be attending my mother's funeral. And if you want to ask it honestly as opposed to trying to make a point - what if all of her other family is PRAYING I don't show up. Who shall I be sensitive to then?

Funerals are for the living, and sensitivity has nothing to do with it. A cultural center. Repeat after me, Cultural Center! is being built two. Blocks. Away.

Just leave them be.


- "No German of goodwill would even think of proposing a German cultural center at, say, Treblinka."

or

- "While no one objects to Japanese cultural centers, the idea of putting one up at Pearl Harbor would be offensive."

- Dr. Charles Krauthammer


Explain the difference if you can.


j-mac
 
And again. Because you say so.

No, because it is fact....How many amendments to Barry's statement have been given since Friday? Hmmm? This keystone WH can't shoot straight.


j-mac
 
I hope they don't build it there, it would be a nightmare, during, and after construction.

Vandalism and protests would be a massive problem. Protests fine. Vandalism not, I hope we can agree on that.

Nonsense. As I already pointed out there are over a thousand Mosques nation wide. If we were so afraid then why haven't they been shuttered?

The problem is an increasing attitude of negativety towards Muslims in general.

he may have, he may not have. Neither can be proven. But I would lay out there that so far the Imam's actions in this mess have been little more than outright lies.

I'm sorry when did he lie about anything? I just haven't heard him say anything that he claimed to be right, but wasn't... or can you prove me wrong there?

And if you're reffering to his inability to call Hammas a terrorist organization... that's not a lie. It's true that Hammas is a terrorist organization, not willing to say so is an error in judgement, not a lie.

Opinions come from a plethora of different places from different people. I think it is rather presumptuous of you to narrow it down to the neat little offensive box you do.

"Mosque of Conquest"

You invented the term to give your argument an emotional appeal. It is not a mosque of Conquest.

Could I not just as easily label you as complacent to radical Islam through an unwillingness to understand the threat that comes out of radical Islam? I think so.

I understand perfectly the threat of Radical Islam. I understand what is even more sinister, using that threat to scare us into giving up our rights and freedoms. I.E. Patriot Act, and all similar legislation enacted in the Western World.

It is 600 feet. Too close.

Well at least we're not still claiming it's "Towering Over".

Congratulations. Then you also know that you will not make friends with them by prostrating yourself in front of them, right?

What are you talking about?

Yeah? Who's fault is it then? I know, do you?

So who's fault is it then that nothing has been rebuilt. Or is it just having a giant hole in the ground reminds Americans of why they should continue to be afraid and tow the line.

Seems as though that is the only thing liberals can say when opinion goes against whatever they propose today? Healthcare takeover? Against 70%, DO IT ANYWAY! Finance Reform current existence? 70% Against, DO IT ANYWAY! NYC mosque? 65% Against, 'well the people are wrong, DO IT ANYWAY!

How long you libs think this will work with the American people?

j-mac

Do we now institute law based on mob rule? Since when did this happen?

The point is, the people are angry about this, I can't say I blame them... but it is important to understand this is about Freedom of Religion and Private Property Rights. IF the people want to institute an Anti-Islam Clause into those things then I suppose they can do that. But until then, you can protest it all you want, but it's their land.
 
New York Post
Aug 13, 2010



President Obama comes out in support of Ground Zero mosque - NYPOST.com

As of today 61% of New Yorkers many of them democrats, are aginst the ground zero mosque. Obama comes out in support. Not a very smart move on his part.

Well I'd say he's right in this case. Now he wants to show that our commitment to religious tolerance is "unshakable"; that has yet to be seen. That deals with how we respond to the situation, not the government. Hopefully we remain rock solid in our commitment to freedom and liberty. But Muslims do have the same right to practice religion and that does include the ability to build a place to worship and community center on private property. Nothing wrong with what he said. We'll see how tolerant the rest of us are coming up here.
 
The problem is an increasing attitude of negativety towards Muslims in general.

and mr rauf is making it much, much worse

you can protest it all you want, but it's their land.

true, but it's relations with us (for purpose of argument) he says he's trying to improve
 
Now he wants to show that our commitment to religious tolerance is "unshakable"

that's certainly not how it's playing, read the times, cbs, abc, politico, wsj...

i've pasted all the links above, of course

"forceful" and "message muddling," are the notes i've jotted down

he had to "pull back the pull back," referring to mr burton's SATURDAY NITE release

abc's rick klein: burton had to ELABORATE on obama's CLARIFICATION (proffered typically impromptu, off the cuff, while vacationing on the gulf saturday afternoon)

talk about shaky

mr rauf, if you really want to improve relations with your neighbors as you claim, then you simply cannot leave that church where it is

if you leave it where it is, you can never reach your stated goal, your purpose can never be fulfilled

so simple
 
Last edited:
that's certainly not how it's playing, read the times, cbs, abc, politico, wsj...

i've pasted all the links above, of course

"forceful" and "message muddling," are the notes i've jotted down

he had to "pull back the pull back," referring to mr burton's SATURDAY NITE release

abc's rick klein: burton had to ELABORATE on obama's CLARIFICATION (proffered characteristically impromptu, off the cuff, while vacationing on the gulf saturday afternoon)

talk about shaky

mr rauf, if you really want to improve relations with your neighbors as you claim, then you simply cannot leave that church where it is

if you leave it where it is, you can never reach your stated goal, your purpose can never be fulfilled

so simple

Why do you say "never"?

It is possible that it will exist and people could see it is harmless.
 
because the people he's trying to befriend are asking him out of respect for their heartfelt sentiments to move

if he runs roughshod over their wishes, how are they gonna come round?

think
 
Last edited:
because the people he's trying to befriend are asking him out of respect for their heartfelt sentiments to move

if he runs roughshod over their wishes, how are they gonna come round?

think

some people you can't reach

you can't please everyone

respect
 
oh, he might be able to get thru to some

but he'd have to move his mosque first
 
How would any of you pro Mosque people feel about a KKK recruiting and information center in the center of Haarlem?
You now know how I feel about this Mosque.

If the people living in harlem wanted to allow it, then I wouldn't give a **** because it's none of my ****ing business how they run their zoning board.
 
Vandalism and protests would be a massive problem. Protests fine. Vandalism not, I hope we can agree on that.

Ofcourse. I don't think vandalism is their worry should they build it.


The problem is an increasing attitude of negativety towards Muslims in general.

And why do you suppose that is? Could it be that in times of attack like 9/11 we heard stone cold silence from these supposed moderates? Or worse yet in the words of Imam Rauf, that the US was "accomplice to the events of 9/11"? PUHLEEZE!


I'm sorry when did he lie about anything? I just haven't heard him say anything that he claimed to be right, but wasn't... or can you prove me wrong there?

And if you're reffering to his inability to call Hammas a terrorist organization... that's not a lie. It's true that Hammas is a terrorist organization, not willing to say so is an error in judgement, not a lie.

One of the biggest lies so far is that they are building this as an "outreach center"...
Yeah right! :roll: Tell me why when this first came to the public's attention that it was referred to as a Mosque, obviously to shroud it in religious freedoms of the US, then as the argument heated up, all of the sudden it was a "Cultural Center" with a mosque in it....:roll: The next one that Rauf thought that no one would pick up on was the naming of that Mosque "Cordoba House" and the significance of that name in the history of Muslim caliphate in the 700's, I have already pointed that one out. Another is the masking of funding for this Mosque, where is it coming from, and whom is behind it?

Shall I continue?


"Mosque of Conquest"

You invented the term to give your argument an emotional appeal. It is not a mosque of Conquest.

No, I am calling it what it is. The name, and other aspects make it so.

I understand perfectly the threat of Radical Islam. I understand what is even more sinister, using that threat to scare us into giving up our rights and freedoms. I.E. Patriot Act, and all similar legislation enacted in the Western World.

Oh spare me the US is more threat to US citizens than radical Islam crap will ya? We either take on this threat to win, or get ready to submit. It is that simple.

Well at least we're not still claiming it's "Towering Over".

I never heard your answer as to how much of the Twin Towers are rebuilt yet?

What are you talking about?

It is real simple, I read you as one that believes that we can make friends with these radicals, and if that is your presentation, then you clearly do NOT understand what we face.

So who's fault is it then that nothing has been rebuilt. Or is it just having a giant hole in the ground reminds Americans of why they should continue to be afraid and tow the line.

My guess would be that the liberal politicians that have constantly railed for stupid things like a museum in the lobby that highlights America as a horrible place and glorified Muslim imperialism, to the inability of liberal politicians to lead in NYC and get this thing done.

Do we now institute law based on mob rule? Since when did this happen?

Sorry, but either the peoples voice means something, or it doesn't....Liberals have already shown clearly that they can't handle the mantel of leadership in more than one way, I guess they will simply NOT get the message.

The point is, the people are angry about this, I can't say I blame them... but it is important to understand this is about Freedom of Religion and Private Property Rights. IF the people want to institute an Anti-Islam Clause into those things then I suppose they can do that. But until then, you can protest it all you want, but it's their land.

More strawman arguments I see.

j-mac
 
And why do you suppose that is? Could it be that in times of attack like 9/11 we heard stone cold silence from these supposed moderates? Or worse yet in the words of Imam Rauf, that the US was "accomplice to the events of 9/11"? PUHLEEZE!

I am getting so tired of posting this.

Muslim Americans
In a Joint Statement by American Muslim Alliance, American Muslim Council, Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers, Association of Muslim Social Scientists, Council on American-Islamic Relations, Islamic Medical Association of North America, Islamic Circle of North America, Islamic Society of North America, Ministry of Imam W. Deen Mohammed, Muslim American Society and Muslim Public Affairs Council, stated:[5]

American Muslims utterly condemn the vicious and cowardly acts of terrorism against innocent civilians. We join with all Americans in calling for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators. No political cause could ever be assisted by such immoral acts.

Renowned Muslim scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi denounced the attacks and the killings of hundreds of civilians as a "heinous crime" and urged Muslims to donate blood to the victims. He did however criticise the United States' "biased policy towards Israel"

This is kind of expected though.

Huge crowds attended candlelit vigils in Iran, and 60,000 spectators observed a minute's silence at Tehran football stadium.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One of the biggest lies so far is that they are building this as an "outreach center"...
Yeah right! :roll: Tell me why when this first came to the public's attention that it was referred to as a Mosque, obviously to shroud it in religious freedoms of the US, then as the argument heated up, all of the sudden it was a "Cultural Center" with a mosque in it....:roll: The next one that Rauf thought that no one would pick up on was the naming of that Mosque "Cordoba House" and the significance of that name in the history of Muslim caliphate in the 700's, I have already pointed that one out. Another is the masking of funding for this Mosque, where is it coming from, and whom is behind it?

Shall I continue?

Well whoever originally called the entire thing a Mosque straight up obviously had a chip on their shoulder. Who cares about the 700's. What year is it again?

No, I am calling it what it is. The name, and other aspects make it so.

That's dishonest. Would it not be a mosque of conquest if it were on ground zero itself with a big flag saying Mosque of Conquest... no? I don't know many conquest monuments that have a performance and a swimming pool. Or do you think muslims will be diving into the pool while shouting death to America? :mrgreen:

Oh spare me the US is more threat to US citizens than radical Islam crap will ya? We either take on this threat to win, or get ready to submit. It is that simple.

No it isn't. Do you know how easily the patriot act can be turned against you?

I never heard your answer as to how much of the Twin Towers are rebuilt yet?

It's not across the street. It will not "Tower Over" it's Two blocks away. Get over yourself.

It is real simple, I read you as one that believes that we can make friends with these radicals, and if that is your presentation, then you clearly do NOT understand what we face.

When did I say that. Direct quote please? Who said anything about making friends with radical islamists? Or are you implying something because all your arguments are faulty, and the only way you can see to displant mine is to try and paint me as a terrorist sympathizer, how could such a strategy fail?


My guess would be that the liberal politicians that have constantly railed for stupid things like a museum in the lobby that highlights America as a horrible place and glorified Muslim imperialism, to the inability of liberal politicians to lead in NYC and get this thing done.

Guess you can't prove any of that eh? Your argument pretty much lacks all credibility and sense right about here. "Liberal this and liberal that. Mmmmhmmm and I'm Nelson Mandela.

Sorry, but either the peoples voice means something, or it doesn't....Liberals have already shown clearly that they can't handle the mantel of leadership in more than one way, I guess they will simply NOT get the message.

Either the constitution means something or it doesn't. Conservatives like you have shown clearly they can't handle the mantel of the constitution in more than one way, I guess you will simply NEVER get the message as to what this argument is really about.

More strawman arguments I see.

j-mac

*sigh* look who's talking :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom