I don't see anyone who was involved in the forced removal of native americans from the original 13 colonies, yet people are sensitive about that.
The list goes on.
Basically what you are trying to say is that nobody has a right to be sensitive to anything unless THAT SPECIFIC GROUP is the one harming those sensitivities.
Wanting secular laws not to conflict with the bible is the very definition of a radical Christian. This man is a theocrat not a liberal, he wants Sharia which means he wants to outlaw homosexuality, he wants to outlaw apostasy, he wants premarital sex outlawed, he wants adultery outlawed, he wants discriminatory inheritance laws regarding women, and he wants everything else that Sharia law would entail. His problem with Sharia is not the law but the penal code.But his point was that doing so is not radical any more than when a Christian feels that way. You completely misunderstand his conversation, playing the nonthinking radical misrepresenting role of a Beck.
No they are not you are lying, Glenn Beck never said that the U.S. was an accessory to 9-11, Glenn Beck never called for Sharia, Glenn Beck didn't say that OBL was made in the USA,And Becks comments are exactly the same, with exactly the same meaning.
I'm not misrepresenting a ****ing thing, he said and refused to say everything that I have claimed to the letter.Again, it takes a certain willingness to misrepresent to read it otherwise.
I'm not misrepresenting anything, he has blamed the U.S. for 9-11, said that OBL was made in the USA, both within less than 3 weeks of the attacks, has refused to condemn Hamas as a terrorist organization, and wants a Sharia compliant U.S., I have provided his direct quotes to attest to these facts, any assertion to the contrary is a proven lie.I repeat, you simply have it completely wrong.
Last edited by Agent Ferris; 08-17-10 at 09:50 PM.
This is it? This is your big misrepresentation, your chance to once and for all put Am Thinker in its place? The best you can come up with is to bash Christianity and call the premise wrong, and never truly address how?
Don't ever again come to me with how the AT is so wrong that you won't even address it, you have shown you have nothing here other than an ideological bent that won't allow you to debate honestly.
Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.
Alexis de Tocqueville