the legalisms surrounding this question are one thing, they go this way, they go that
but the politics aren't, they're overwhelmingly one sided
deal with THAT
If you cannot legally prove the harm, then you have no right to restrict the rights of your fellow, tax-paying, law-abiding citizens.
I am for freedom. You are not. Call it what you will, but I find the celebration of and the threat of taking rights away from fellow Americans to be indecent at best.
I was discovering that life just simply isn't fair and bask in the unsung glory of knowing that each obstacle overcome along the way only adds to the satisfaction in the end. Nothing great, after all, was ever accomplished by anyone sulking in his or her misery.
Somehow it never occurs to you people that maybe judges can make decisions based on the law. Perhaps you should question yourselves. It seems you would make decisions based on your own personal biases and therefore you assume everyone else would, too.
Read my books! http://michaelaventrella.com
And a Mormon should have recused himself because her church provided like 75% of the funding for Prop 8?
Surely, and Evangelical would have to recuse himself because God knows they're pretty biased against the gays.
So, who - in your opinion - should have heard it?