Why can't the homosexual movement leave the churches alone? Why do they have to have "gay pride" parades and trounce around in thongs and diapers? Why can't they sit at home and keep their sexuality private? Why do they have to call everyone who opposes them "bigots" and force their beliefs on others? I'm so tired of people judging me as a homosexual hater because I believe homosexuality is wrong. I'm tired of being called a bigot and being harassed for simply holding my beliefs. Why can't the social liberals leave me alone and allow me to vote like everyone else? Things go both ways. I am in that position too, and I've been harrased for holding my views. Now I have an entire state saying that my views are illegal in the first place.How about this one? I don't care what you and "fish market" do in the privacy of your own home, but stop running ads in papers to announce your marriages, stop plastering your hypersexual advertisements all over television and sit down and STFU while the rest of us get on with our happy lives together. And when she gets sick with chick cancer, well you can just hope the hospital lets you in to see her or that you shelled out the money for a power of attorney. And when "Melons" ups and croaks, well you can give a huge chunk of what you worked your entire lives together for to the government. But I don't have to because well...I'm not dating a tuna can, which I find morally appalling because its...icky.
How ****in well do you think that would go over with you if you were in that situation, pal?
The fact that the two unions are biologically and socially different. An apple and an orange are both fruit, but they aren't the same thing. A homosexual union and marriage are both unions, but neither are the same. It's not wrong to define something that is different differently.And what does the biology have to do with it for homos that is so special that it can't be applied to heteros?
If it's on the ballot then I do have that right. Homosexuals are not second class citizens. How are they? Homosexuality is not like race or religion. It's a sexual orientation just like heterosexuality, bestiality, pansexuality, asexuality, etc. Why is homosexuality superior to bestiality? And I would have a liberal definition of marriage shoved down my throat. So, with the overturn of Prop 8 those who voted for it don't have their rights trampled on for supporting something that is widely regarded by the majority of the nation to be constitutional? Why didn't they decide if it was constitutional before they allowed voters to vote on it?First of all, you have no rights as a voter to use that vote to make other voters second class citizens. Secondly, unless he added an addendum that requires you, legally, to go meet and greet every new gay married couple, you haven't had jack **** shoved down your throat. All your whining and complaining is because you didn't get your way and have the chance to elevate yourself above your fellow citizen.
So you don't care about my rights, yet we all need to bow down to what you believe are rights.Go ahead...ask me if I have the first ounce of sympathy for your pitiful plight?
So, as a Democratic Republic we don't have the right to vote? What rights were taken away? It was never a right in California to legalize homosexual marriages. All that happened was a definition for legal marriage being establish by the citizens within the Democrat Republic.You have no rights to vote away rights of other people. We are a Democratic Republic, not an inquisition mob.