disneydude
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Messages
- 25,528
- Reaction score
- 8,470
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Once again....Liberty and justice for ALL....not just some.
I've always thought this was the worst ever argument for gay marriage.
Bestiality does not affect people (and animals) not engaged in it. Pedophilia/statutory rape does not affect anyone not involved. Marrying an animal or a young child does not affect anyone not involved in the marriage. Yet they're still illegal, as they should be.
There are good arguments for gay marriage, but this is not one of them.
I think it makes marriage more valued. Once again, we cancel each other out.
I've always thought this was the worst ever argument for gay marriage.
Bestiality does not affect people (and animals) not engaged in it. Pedophilia/statutory rape does not affect anyone not involved. Marrying an animal or a young child does not affect anyone not involved in the marriage. Yet they're still illegal, as they should be.
There are good arguments for gay marriage, but this is not one of them.
It cheapens the definition of marriage.............
views and beliefs are capable of violating another sovereign person's rights?
i wonder what that civics-for-kids teacher would say about that
well lets throw the people that want to marry more then one partner...........why should they be excluded...........why do gays get special rights over them?
Once again....Liberty and justice for ALL....not just some.
Do I have to explain the 14th amenddment and the equal protection clause to you?
I live in the same state that you do and I in no way feel micromanaged.
Exactly I don't know why we even vote on anything in this country anymore..........Just let judges decide everything...........
Nothing has been settled yet my left wing friend...I would not count my chickens if I were you...........
A gay judge ruling for gays...nothing more............
I sure you felt the same way about the approval of inter-racial marriage in Loving v. Virginia.
Ewwwww.....those inter-racial couples marrying....cheapening our homogenous marriages.
There are some things I don't like people usurping my control over.
Largely right now, I'm not micromanaged but have road blocks tossed in my path for nonsensical reasons.
nothing to do witth gay marriage........you have a race of people verses a class of people defined by who they have sex with.......
nothing to do witth gay marriage........you have a race of people verses a class of people defined by who they have sex with.......
Nothing has been settled yet my left wing friend...I would not count my chickens if I were you...........
A gay judge ruling for gays...nothing more............
Other than the fact that you are for the liberty and justice for a restricted group instead of all law-abiding, tax-paying citizens to marry the individual of their choosing.
You would rather big government tell them who they are not allowed to marry. You don't see it as such, but you're supporting big government. You want it to rule people's lives whom you disagree with.
As long as they don't tell YOU what to do, you want small government. But you don't mind big government if it intrudes in other people's lives.
Navy is a big government advocate.
nothing to do witth gay marriage........you have a race of people verses a class of people defined by who they have sex with.......
Yeah, I think I am getting you, personally though I feel that even with them, my quality of life is in no way diminished. Its probably just a matter of perception.
I could give a ****, either way, if gays get married. But, at what point can't a judge over-rule the will of the people?