Why do you feel entitled to jump into a thread without reading it, and then expect people to rehash points they've made because you're too lazy to read the context of the discussion?
I'm not doing it. Seek and ye will find. Otherwise, I'm done with you.
obama has NO POLICY pertaining to perhaps the most dangerous regime on earth
that's not ME talkin
You then clarify this to mean that to implement an invasion is a stupid idea.Most of us think it's still a stupid idea
You HAVE talked about the onyl plan you can see being implemented, but you have not given your judgement of same.
Given that you yourself said there are several other plans, not all dealing with invations, it is then unclear if you think that these plans are also a stupid idea.
You can -easily- clarify this issue.
Last edited by Goobieman; 08-04-10 at 02:26 PM.
Holy ****, it turns out Obama does have a plan, and you proved it to us!Since the three-page memo, written in January, a series of new options have been developed for Mr. Obama, including military means for dealing with Tehran if it should acquire a nuclear weapon,
the article I wrote?"
and there are no changes, according to the WHITE HOUSERobert Gates, the Pentagon chief, has warned President Barack Obama in a secret "wake-up call" memo that the White House has no effective policy for dealing with a nuclear Iran.
In the memo, the U.S. Secretary of Defence outlined a scenario -- viewed in Washington as increasingly likely -- in which Iran would gather all the major parts required to build a nuclear weapon but stop just short of actually assembling them to make a fully operational bomb.
No effective policy on Iran, Gates says"It is absolutely false that any memo touched off a reassessment of our options," said Ben Rhodes, a National Security Council spokesman. "This administration has been planning for all contingencies regarding Iran for many months."