Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 136

Thread: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

  1. #1
    User
    Chappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Last Seen
    04-07-15 @ 01:50 AM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    2,443
    Blog Entries
    26

    GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Excerpted from “GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review” By J. Taylor Rushing
 and Bob Cusack, The Hill, 08/02/10 06:56 PM ET
    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told The Hill on Monday that Congress “ought to take a look at” changing the 14th Amendment, which gives the children of illegal immigrants a right to U.S. citizenship.

    McConnell’s statement signals growing support within the GOP for the controversial idea, which has also recently been touted by Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). …
    Conservatives really aren't too interested in conserving the foundations of this nation, are they? No, not lately.

    They've either taken leave of their senses or their principles. — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

    Likely, both.
    “Real environmentalists live in cities, and they visit what's left of the wilderness as gently and respectfully as possible.” — Donna Moulton, letter to the editor, Tucson Weekly, published on August 23, 2001

  2. #2
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by Chappy View Post
    Conservatives really aren't too interested in conserving the foundations of this nation, are they? No, not lately.

    They've either taken leave of their senses or their principles. — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

    Likely, both.
    Section 1 of the 14th amendment was created to make citizens out of the freed slaves and their descendants. Section 1 of the 14th amendment does not apply to everyone born on US soil.Why else have the Indian citizenship act of 1924 and the nationality act of 1940 if section 1 of the 14th amendment applied to anyone born on US soil? The 14th amendment is simply misused by pro-illegals.

    As for the anchor baby problem this can be eliminated simply by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act of 196 that allows for the chain migration of relatives other than spouse or minor children.This is what makes a anchor baby a anchor baby, not the 14th amendment. By eliminating the this provision you can end anchor babies.
    Last edited by jamesrage; 08-03-10 at 05:46 PM.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  3. #3
    Slayer of the DP Newsbot
    danarhea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    39,732

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
    Section 1 of the 14th amendment was created to make citizens out of the freed slaves and their descendants. Section 1 of the 14th amendment does not apply to everyone born on US soil.Why else have the Indian citizenship act of 1924 and the nationality act of 1940 if section 1 of the 14th amendment applied to anyone born on US soil? The 14th amendment is simply misused by pro-illegals.

    As for the anchor baby problem this can be eliminated simply by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act of 196 that allows for the chain migration of relatives other than spouse or minor children.This is what makes a anchor baby a anchor baby, not the 14th amendment. By eliminating the this provision you can end anchor babies.
    Exactly, and doing that will eliminate the tourist baby industry, which is huge. People from all around the world get tourist visas just so they can come to the US and have their babies here, thus making them citizens. It's a booming trade in some countries.
    The ghost of Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2016

  4. #4
    Professor

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Last Seen
    11-21-14 @ 03:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    2,120

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
    Section 1 of the 14th amendment was created to make citizens out of the freed slaves and their descendants. Section 1 of the 14th amendment does not apply to everyone born on US soil.Why else have the Indian citizenship act of 1924 and the nationality act of 1940 if section 1 of the 14th amendment applied to anyone born on US soil? The 14th amendment is simply misused by pro-illegals.

    As for the anchor baby problem this can be eliminated simply by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act of 196 that allows for the chain migration of relatives other than spouse or minor children.This is what makes a anchor baby a anchor baby, not the 14th amendment. By eliminating the this provision you can end anchor babies.
    Technically, not true: SCOTUS in United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia pretty much made it clear that as long as the parents have residence (could that be read as "legal residence?") then the kid is a citizen.

    However, your suggestion that the family link in immigration law be changed is okay.

    Look, I don't know a college educated person who would clean toilets or clear landscaping (at least in Nashville - not today). What about simply creating easier-to-get guest worker permits that give people up to 24-months of legal residence. They then have to reapply and if they're arrested for any crime (not a civil offense like a traffic ticket); they're out.

    I just wish people would sit down and discuss ideas with one another. Altering the Constitution is not one that's likely to work and it's yet another demographic killer for the Republican Party. At some point they need to recognize that they're going to alienate a HUGE voting population that is growing quickly (and I mean Hispanic citizens - not illegals).

  5. #5
    Professor

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Last Seen
    11-21-14 @ 03:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    2,120

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by danarhea View Post
    Exactly, and doing that will eliminate the tourist baby industry, which is huge. People from all around the world get tourist visas just so they can come to the US and have their babies here, thus making them citizens. It's a booming trade in some countries.
    How about not giving tourist visas to women beyond so-many-months pregnant? I can't imagine that would unconstitutional since they're not citizens.

    It doesn't require altering the Constitution to fix the problem of anchor baby tourism.

  6. #6
    Sage
    Taylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    US
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:21 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,170

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by Chappy View Post
    Conservatives really aren't too interested in conserving the foundations of this nation, are they? No, not lately.
    The 14th amendment was enacted almost a hundered years after the nation's founding, so birthright citizenship is hardly a "foundation of this nation." There was a time when such an amendment was needed, but now we're in a minority of mostly third-world countries that share in this.

    I have to agree with McConnell - it should be reviewed.

  7. #7
    Professor

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Last Seen
    11-21-14 @ 03:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    2,120

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
    The 14th amendment was enacted almost a hundered years after the nation's founding, so birthright citizenship is hardly a "foundation of this nation." There was a time when such an amendment was needed, but now we're in a minority of mostly third-world countries that share in this.

    I have to agree with McConnell - it should be reviewed.
    But if that's going to be your solution, it's going to fail.

    To me, this is just another attempt by Republicans to pretend they're doing something when really, they're not doing a damn thing. It's all political hooey and nothing more.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Last Seen
    02-16-11 @ 08:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    36,915
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by FilmFestGuy View Post
    But if that's going to be your solution, it's going to fail.

    To me, this is just another attempt by Republicans to pretend they're doing something when really, they're not doing a damn thing. It's all political hooey and nothing more.
    I think this is just an attempt to claim the Republicans aren't doing anything that's undermined by the fact that you are bitching about them trying to do something you just happen not to like.

  9. #9
    Sage


    MaggieD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chicago Area
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    43,243
    Blog Entries
    43

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    Quote Originally Posted by Chappy View Post
    Conservatives really aren't too interested in conserving the foundations of this nation, are they? No, not lately.

    They've either taken leave of their senses or their principles. — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

    Likely, both.
    This isn't likely to go far, but I applaud both Senators McConnell, Kyl and Graham for their intestinal fortitude. Good for them!!

    Americans are completely and utterly frustrated with the state of our immigration system. We have a Congress who is trying to sneak amnesty in the backdoor whether we want it or not. A White House that is refusing to enforce the laws of the land....AND blocking individual states who are doing the best they can to enforce them on their own.

    I don't live in a border state. But I can completely and totally understand and sympathize with their position. Their budgets are being descimated. Their parks are being over-run. Their neighborhoods have become battle zones. They are embittered. And they have every GD right to be.

    The fact that senators are "upping the ante," so to speak, is wonderful, in my opinion. Our entire Congress should be ashamed of themselves. Whatever their hidden agenda is, it is 100% wrong. Both sides of the aisle are being disingenuous about immigration reform. They don't want to tackle it before the elections because they know damn well what the people want.

    IMO, the immigration problem should have been tackled on President Obama's first day in office...not 18 months or more later. Good for the senators.
    The devil whispered in my ear, "You cannot withstand the storm." I whispered back, "I am ​the storm."

  10. #10
    Guru
    Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Seen
    12-21-10 @ 05:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,063

    Re: GOP leader McConnell: Fourteenth Amendment is in need of review

    I don't know why people can't read a simple sentence and understand what is being said.

    Here is the problem part.

    Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. Note History

    1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
    Now people are taking "jurisdiction" to mean what a cop means when he says it's out of my jurisdiction.... or out of my city/county.

    If that were so the above quoted sentence would read....

    1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and born in the United States, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

    Rather redundant isn't it?

    So what does “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” mean?

    Fortunately, we have the highest possible authority on record to answer this question of how the term "jurisdiction" was to be interpreted and applied, the author of the citizenship clause, Sen. Jacob M. Howard (MI) to tell us exactly what it means and its intended scope as he introduced it to the United States Senate in 1866:
    Mr. HOWARD: I now move to take up House joint resolution No. 127.
    The motion was agreed to; and the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, resumed the consideration of the joint resolution (H.R. No. 127) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
    The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all "persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.

    Sen. Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, author of the Thirteenth Amendment, and the one who inserted the phrase:
    [T]he provision is, that 'all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.' That means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' What do we mean by 'complete jurisdiction thereof?' Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

    Sen. W. Williams:
    In one sense, all persons born within the geographical limits of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in every sense. Take the child of an ambassador. In one sense, that child born in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, because if that child commits the crime of murder, or commits any other crime against the laws of the country, to a certain extent he is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, but not in every respect; and so with these Indians. All persons living within a judicial district may be said, in one sense, to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in that district, but they are not in every sense subject to the jurisdiction of the court until they are brought, by proper process, within the reach of the power of the court. I understand the words here, 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,' to mean fully and completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
    There is no such thing as a “Natural Born Dual-Citizen“.

    Originally Posted by PogueMoran
    I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read.

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •