• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Outsted USDA employee Sherrod plans to sue blogger

Reverend_Hellh0und said:
McCain had my vote until McCain started talking.
Click to expand...

I was hesitant, but he won me over after reading more and more stuff about him. I don't like everything about him, but I liked enough. And then Palin came along. LOL Fuuuuuck that.
 
rivrrat said:
I was hesitant, but he won me over after reading more and more stuff about him. I don't like everything about him, but I liked enough. And then Palin came along. LOL Fuuuuuck that.
Click to expand...




McCain in the debates wanted to outspend and nationalize mortgages, and I said Nyet comrade!
 
rivrrat said:
No, I didn't Joey. I gained no knowledge of Mexico living in San Diego. None.
Click to expand...

*cough* bull**** *cough*

That's the whole ****ing point. You DIDN'T know what my full experience was.
Click to expand...

No, that's a stupid, air boxing gotcha game you were trying to play. Had you been put before me as a candidate for a job and you said, as one of your qualifications, that you had lived in a foreign country...then I would have had something to infer from. Your "point" was nothing more than a juvenile attempt to play trump cards that aren't even part of the same deck the rest of us are playing with.


And I didn't tell you at first. Maybe Palin actually did have experience, but she didn't SAY that.
Click to expand...

Oh she said it. She just didn't bother to draw you a picture and talk to you in her kindergarten teacher voice.

Just as I didn't say that I lived in Mexico and have such experience. There's no way in ****ing hell you could infer the amount of experience I have with Mexico just by way of me telling you I lived near the border. And I sure as **** wouldn't expect you to. Yet, that's what you're saying the whole country should have done when Palin said she could see Russia.
Click to expand...

Your living near the border tells me a lot about what you were exposed to.

Nah, i'm punching my Aflac duck on my desk because he squeaks when I hit him.
Click to expand...

I have that same ****ing duck on my desk...and yeah, it's worthy of a good punch.
 
Last edited:
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
McCain in the debates wanted to outspend and nationalize mortgages, and I said Nyet comrade!
Click to expand...

I didn't watch the debates. By that time I'd already decided that I couldn't stomach putting someone like Palin in such a high office.
 
Reverend_Hellh0und said:
....and so you ended up with a guy named Biden. :ssst:
Click to expand...

Better him than her. I don't hear anything from him. Never see him. I like that better. Palin? I STILL have to ****ing hear about.

Anywho, I abstained from voting since I couldn't stomach any of the candidates.
 
jallman said:
OK, whathe****ever then. But your refusal to acknowledge truth is what is really disturbing.
Click to expand...

I know the truth, I know what I learned and didn't learn and where. It's you that's just outright calling me a liar. And there's really no counter to that except to say **** you then. Believe whatever the **** you want.
 
rivrrat said:
I know the truth, I know what I learned and didn't learn and where. It's you that's just outright calling me a liar. And there's really no counter to that except to say **** you then. Believe whatever the **** you want.
Click to expand...

I would concede that maybe you haven't really given much thought to your experience gained there. But you did gain experience whether you realize it or not.
 
MrVicchio said:
Your post wasn't worth reading.

And you ignored the rest.

Just like I said you'd do in the first post in response to you, you've "ignored".

Mr Vic 3, DD 0.

Carry on son, you've been owned.
Click to expand...

Nice try to save face....but you got egg all over it.

I predicted that you would try to use the Tina Fey example....and you turned around 3 threads later and did exactly that.

I had you figured out months ago.

LOL......
 
She wasn't fired, she resigned.

There's no case here.

Yeah, yeah, I know, "she was forced to resign". Well, she has to prove that. That means draggin in some high government people to testify that they forced her to resign. Do any of us think that's really going to happen?
 
Last edited:
disneydude said:
Nice try to save face....but you got egg all over it.

I predicted that you would try to use the Tina Fey example....and you turned around 3 threads later and did exactly that.

I had you figured out months ago.

LOL......
Click to expand...

Come back when you can address all his points not cherry pick what you think you can win.

V is for victory
 
texmaster said:
Come back when you can address all his points not cherry pick what you think you can win.

V is for victory
Click to expand...

Nice attempt to try to rehablitate your BFF....everyone following this thread saw him make a fool out of himself. No effort on your part to double team is going to change the facts.

It was a lame example and predicted that he would try to use it. If he had even read 1/2 way into the post he wouldn't have made the mistake...

He didn't read AND he stretched big time to try to use SNL as an example of the media slurring Palin.

I think we all got a good laugh out of it.
 
This may be an unpopular position, but I think she should sue. I think she will lose, but at least it will employ a possible out of work lawyer for about 6 months....Hey, isn't that about 24 jobs using Obama math?


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
This may be an unpopular position, but I think she should sue. I think she will lose, but at least it will employ a possible out of work lawyer for about 6 months....Hey, isn't that about 24 jobs using Obama math?


j-mac
Click to expand...

I actually agree, the problem is Sherrod needs to prove that the blogger did post that slander/libel knowing full well it is. If the blogger just posted a video that was modified before he got the video, then he gets scot free.
And Obama's quote, "We need to see more types of news like this" (paraphrased) is quite disheartening. Obama should say we should see less of this and that this incident was for us to learn from, not that we need more news like this...
 
disneydude said:
Nice attempt to try to rehablitate your BFF....everyone following this thread saw him make a fool out of himself. No effort on your part to double team is going to change the facts.

It was a lame example and predicted that he would try to use it. If he had even read 1/2 way into the post he wouldn't have made the mistake...

He didn't read AND he stretched big time to try to use SNL as an example of the media slurring Palin.

I think we all got a good laugh out of it.
Click to expand...

If he was making such a fool of himself you wouldn't have cherry picked what points you responded to.

Face it. He got you and you lacked the courage to face all of his points.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom