Boston = City of Champions: Bruins 2011; Celtics 2008; Red Sox 2004, 2007; Patriots 2002, 2004, 2005
Jon Huntsman for President
"If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu
"To waste, to destroy, our natural resources, to skin and exhaust the land instead of using it so as to increase its usefulness, will result in undermining in the days of our children the very prosperity which we ought by rights to hand down to them."~ Theodore Roosevelt (Message to Congress, Dec. 3, 1907)
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
A video of an incident by itself can provide evidence once it is admitted (such as for a robbery). Even then, it is just one piece of evidence, to which a person could argue that it's not him, but someone who looks similar, and so on.
To convict someone by a picture -- which does not necessarily show criminal activity -- and which may not necessarily show who was driving -- is what is being questioned here. There is no one there who can say "that's him" or "I observed the incident and he was definitely driving."