Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

  1. #11
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,990

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Catz Part Deux View Post
    But it isn't equally likely. That's the point. The only reason you even consider it equally likely is your pre-existing paradigm that corporate america=good, government=bad.
    That's so illogical it hurts my head

    So I think "corporate america" = good" and "government = bad", and therefore I think its equally likely that Corporate America AND the Government are taking stances on actions in part based on what's best for them and not necessarily what's best for the situation in general?

    So what you're saying is I think something that's "bad" is just as likely to act in a certain way as something I view as "Good".

    "I think Pizza = Good and Lima Beans = Bad. Its just as likely that I'll enjoy eating Lima Beans as I enjoy eating Pizza".



    That doesn't make sense.

    The government and politicians often work for their own interest. Its why they lie (see the "no taxes" statement about the individual mandate), its why they manipulate (See how the Bush administration justified Iraq without ever actually connecting it directly to 9/11), its why they speak empty rhetoric (Change from politics as usual!), and its why they love to find a villian and someone to paste as "the bad guy" (take Wall Street or Illegal Immigrants for your side of choice).

    Business also often work for their own interest. That's why you have instances where ethics are ignored, items are made on the cheap regardless of quality, CEO's get bonus's while bemoaning how many employees they had to lay off, and other such things.

    Does the government always do this or all politicians do it? No. Are all corporations constantly trying to screw everyone else and do all businessmen only look out for themselves? No. But its ridiculous in this situation just to rail against one.

    For almost every questionable act by BP in this there's been a questionable act by the Government. For almost every act BP that has done which has been boneheadedly stupid there's been an act by the administration and others to exploit this situation to their benefit. Is BP taking actions that may be driven more in regards to saving them profits rather than what's the best for cleaning up the oil? Absolutely its likely. Is the government taking actions that cover their ass and allow further time to demonize BP while shifting blame elsewhere in a hopes to remove this from being viewed as his "Katrina"? Also absolutely likely.

    Seriously, I don't know how in the **** me saying that both of them are capable of bad, both of them could be suggesting what to do partially based on ulterior reasons, and that both of them are not pure as the wind driven snow somehow equals me saying "Corporations are good and the Government is Bad". I don't know what kind of logic you use where saying two things are capable of Bad equals saying one of those things is good and one of those things is bad, and quite frankly its probably wrong of me to even term it as "logic".

  2. #12
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,990

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Tammerlain View Post
    Equally plausable it is not though

    BP has a far higher incentive to keep the well capped, both to stop any new oil from escaping from the well (which may cause problems by the looks of it) and to prevent an accurate count of how much oil has been released so far then does the government. A big enough fine could cost BP a few years profits, while $30 billion dollars to the US government is peanuts.
    Which you're looking only at the financial incentives.

    Publicity that BP is somehow "evading" the fines could be bad publicity for Obama as the public wants blood, in part due to being stirred up by the Media and the administration, and if its viewed as them "evading" the fines there could be backlash towards the administrat for not "properly" punishing them.

    If the oil is not flooding out, and is capped, the story is likely to reduce itself in regards to the day to day events, day to day events that continually allows the administration to point at BP and go "see, see, this bad is because of them". When the day to day horrors of it isn't around you begin to move into the realm and time where finger pointing and examination of the situation and how it was handled begins.

    Talk is already showing up now of Congress potentially moving to begin climate change and environmental talks again, and a spewing oil rig adds a far better back drop to push the emotional buttons for their efforts than something that's capped and not generating continual news.

    Overall, its in the best interests of both sides to get this thing stopped, and I think its ridiculous to assume either aren't trying for it. But I also think its ridiculous to assume that BP's decisions are influenced by profit margins but the Governments decisiosn are absolutely positevely pure as the wind driven snow and can't possibly be tainted by any political ambitions or beliefs but is only about the security of the gulf and the stoppage of the oil....the same government that manipulated and misused expert testimony to push a political agenda of shutting down oil rigs.

    Sorry, I don't buy the notion that we must think the worst of BP immedietely but think the best and greatest of the Obama Administration that's handling this.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Redneck Riviera
    Last Seen
    07-09-11 @ 06:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,728

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Sorry, I don't buy the notion that we must think the worst of BP immedietely but think the best and greatest of the Obama Administration that's handling this.
    Nice combination of strawman/false dichotomy. I have yet to note ANYONE applauding the administration's handling of this issue. In fact, I think that both the response from BP AND the federal response suck. HARD.

  4. #14
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,990

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Catz Part Deux View Post
    Nice combination of strawman/false dichotomy. I have yet to note ANYONE applauding the administration's handling of this issue. In fact, I think that both the response from BP AND the federal response suck. HARD.
    Here's the thing, from my very first post in this thread I was placing negative notions to both sides. Stating that both sides are equally possible to be suggesting what they're suggesting for alterior reasons.

    Meanwhile, the person I was actually responding to did no such thing. They speculated negatively only about BP while suggesting the Obama administrations goals were wholey to "relieve the pressure". My issue is not with making suggestions that BP is handling this wrong, or suggesting they have ulterior motives...my issue is with making that suggestion and implication without also acknowledging the administrations potential ulterior motives in THEIR suggested fix as well either through praising their suggested fix as being benevolent in hopes of simply "releasing the pressure" or outright ignoring the federal government entirely to focus solely and singularly on BP

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Redneck Riviera
    Last Seen
    07-09-11 @ 06:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,728

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Here's the thing, from my very first post in this thread I was placing negative notions to both sides. Stating that both sides are equally possible to be suggesting what they're suggesting for alterior reasons.
    The fact that you believe that they are equally likely to be culpable is just absurd. We already know that BP took shortcuts that lead to the death of 11 people in connection to this incident. Their actions have been outrageously irresponsible, and frankly, unconscionable.

    NEW ORLEANS BP made a series of money-saving shortcuts and blunders that sharply increased the danger of an oil spill in a well that an engineer described as a "nightmare" just six days before the blowout, according to documents released Monday.

    The House Energy and Commerce Committee released dozens of internal documents outlining problems on the deep-sea rig in the days and weeks before the April 20 explosion that triggered the largest environmental disaster in U.S. history. The committee has been investigating the explosion and its aftermath.

    "Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense. If this is what happened, BP's carelessness and complacency have inflicted a heavy toll on the Gulf, its inhabitants, and the workers on the rig," said Democratic Reps. Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak.

    Congressional investigators have identified several mistakes by BP in the weeks leading up to the disaster as it fell way behind on drilling the well.

    BP started drilling in October, only to have the rig damaged by Hurricane Ida a month later. The company switched to the Deepwater Horizon rig and resumed drilling on Feb. 6. The rig was 43 days late for its next drilling location by the time it exploded April 20, costing BP at least $500,000 each day it was overdue, congressional documents show.

    As BP found itself in a frantic race against time to get the job done, engineers cut corners in the well design, cementing and drilling mud efforts and the installation of safety devices known as "lockdown sleeves" and "centralizers," according to congressional investigators.

    In the design of the well, the company apparently chose a riskier option among two possibilities to provide a barrier to the flow of gas in space surrounding steel tubes in the well, documents and internal e-mails show. The decision saved BP $7 million to $10 million; the original cost estimate for the well was about $96 million.

    In an e-mail, BP engineer Brian Morel told a fellow employee that the company is likely to make last-minute changes in the well.

    "We could be running it in 2-3 days, so need a relative quick response. Sorry for the late notice, this has been a nightmare well which has everyone all over the place," Morel wrote.

    The e-mail chain culminated with the following message by another worker: "This has been a crazy well for sure."

    BP also apparently rejected advice from subcontractor Halliburton in preparing for a cementing job to close up the well. BP rejected Halliburton's recommendation to use 21 "centralizers" to make sure the casing ran down the center of the well bore. Instead, BP used six.

    In an e-mail on April 16, a BP official involved in the decision explained: "It will take 10 hours to install them. I do not like this."

    Later that day, another official recognized the risks of proceeding with insufficient centralizers but commented: "Who cares, it's done, end of story, will probably be fine."


    BP also failed to fully circulate drilling mud, a 12-hour procedure that could have helped detect gas pockets that later shot up the well and exploded on the drilling rig.

    Asked about the details disclosed from the investigation, BP spokesman Mark Proegler said the company's main focus right now is on the response and stopping the flow of oil. "It would be inappropriate for us to comment while an investigation is ongoing," Proegler said.
    Panel: BP shortcuts led to big oil spill - CharlotteObserver.com

    I hope that the U.S. attorney in the southern district of Louisiana eventually prosecutes the executives involved in these decisions for manslaughter.
    Last edited by Catz Part Deux; 07-19-10 at 02:12 PM.

  6. #16
    User
    Chappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    San Francisco
    Last Seen
    04-07-15 @ 01:50 AM
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    2,443
    Blog Entries
    26

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by BCR View Post
    … BP probably doesn't want to remove the cap because it could take up to a week to refit it which means lots of additional $$$$ in fines .
    That's news to me, that they have to remove the cap. My understanding is that they can open some valves on the cap and open the flow to the ships on the surface. Further, my understanding is that they would certainly do that when the relief well is ready and they begin the bottom kill procedure.
    “Real environmentalists live in cities, and they visit what's left of the wilderness as gently and respectfully as possible.” — Donna Moulton, letter to the editor, Tucson Weekly, published on August 23, 2001

  7. #17
    Educator
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    02-04-15 @ 11:02 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    808

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by The Dane View Post
    Wow. It never occured to me that an accurate flow rate would lower or raise fines. Apparently they are measuring the flow rate, and then using that to determine how much oil leaked out over the last two months and then fining them based on that. If this number is lowered then BP will get a much much lower bill. This is quite amazing.
    Obviously the total liability is going to be related to the amount of oil that actually leaked.

  8. #18
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:37 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,807

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by NolaMan View Post
    Obviously the total liability is going to be related to the amount of oil that actually leaked.
    Eh, somehow I doubt we'll ever recover the true cost of their screwup. Or the cost of their oversight's screwup.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  9. #19
    Educator
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    02-04-15 @ 11:02 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    808

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Eh, somehow I doubt we'll ever recover the true cost of their screwup. Or the cost of their oversight's screwup.
    Well that depends on what you define as the "true cost." There is a legal manner in which damages will be calculated, and that will be what is owed.

  10. #20
    Advisor BCR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 04:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    598

    Re: Government says leak detected 'a distance from' oil well

    another 24 hours of testing will continue, The pressure readings are unexpected and baffling. I suppose they are trying to figure out what these readings mean?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •