meh sorry I get confused sometimes. I just see DA and think Defense Attorney not District Attorney. That's where my confusion came from.
And you're right they have damning evidence against the Black Panthers. I have said this since my first post. They should charged for it and be put in jail/given heavy fines and all that jazz. But the case was dropped. Now here's were the switch-a-roo comes into play! See the people who dropped the case are NOT the Black Panthers they aren't the ones who showed up at polling stations to intimidate voters. So a video of Black Panthers intimidating voters doesn't really work as damning evidence against people who aren't the Black Panthers. Now if we had a recording of our friendly whistle-blower being told to drop the case because of political reasons, well THEN we would have damning evidence against them. But we don't, we have the word of one man. The word of one man is good enough to look into the whole situation because I agree it does reek of something sinister.... but the word of one man is not damning proof against them.