Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Case...

  1. #1
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Case...

    Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Case for Racial Reasons

    A former Justice Department attorney who quit his job to protest the Obama administration's handling of the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case is accusing Attorney General Eric Holder of dropping the charges for racially motivated reasons.

    J. Christian Adams, now an attorney in Virginia and a conservative blogger for Pajamas Media, says he and the other Justice Department lawyers working on the case were ordered to dismiss it.

    "I mean we were told, 'Drop the charges against the New Black Panther Party,'" Adams told Fox News, adding that political appointees Loretta King, acting head of the civil rights division, and Steve Rosenbaum, an attorney with the division since 2003, ordered the dismissal.

    Asked about the Justice Department's claim that they are career attorneys, not political appointees, Adams said "obviously, that's false."
    ...

    Adams also accused Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez of lying under oath to Congress about the circumstances surrounding the decision to drop the probe.

    Adams says the dismissal is a symptom of the Obama administration's reverse racism and that the Justice Department will not pursue voting rights cases against white victims.

    In the final days of the Bush administration, three Black Panthers -- Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson -- were charged in a civil complaint with violating the Voter Rights Act in November 2008 by using coercion, threats and intimidation at a Philadelphia polling station -- with Shabazz brandishing what prosecutors called a deadly weapon.

    FOXNews.com - Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Case for Racial Reasons
    It was quite incredible they dropped it. I remember thinking WTF is this about... New Justice? Hope? Change?

    It's not reverse racism either... if it is racism... it's simply racism... coming from The "Coward" Holder's Justice Department.

    .
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  2. #2
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    I thought it was for political favors but race is a serious charge.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  3. #3
    Dispenser of Negativity
    Cold Highway's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Newburgh, New York and World 8: Dark Land
    Last Seen
    12-24-12 @ 11:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    9,596
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    The article isnt loading for me but Im assuming this has to do with the BPs "guarding" voting booths and intimidating voters? You would think it would be an open and shut case.
    Jackboots always come in matched pairs, a left boot and a right boot.

  4. #4
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Calling this "racism" or "reverse racism" is nonsensical. There is certainly something to the accusation that Holder's dropping this lawsuit was politically motivated, though that is by no means a certainty. Holder was still within his discretion as AG to drop the ones he did drop (they still pursued the injunction against one of those guys). Maybe he felt like he didn't have a strong enough case to get the injunction for the rest of them. Just because they didn't show up doesn't mean it's "open and shut" for an injunction, the judge still could have denied it, and how would that have looked for the Justice Department? But making this about "reverse racism" in the Obama administration is ridiculous, and turns what is a legitimate issue into an overblown Fox News/WSJ talking point.
    Last edited by Guy Incognito; 07-01-10 at 11:29 AM.

  5. #5
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Quote Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
    The article isnt loading for me but Im assuming this has to do with the BPs "guarding" voting booths and intimidating voters? You would think it would be an open and shut case.
    Oh its obvious racism on the part of the black panthers. They are dressed all in black with batons and white person after white person said they tried to block them calling them white trash, honkey, etc.

    Even an uber liberal came out and said what they were doing was a clear violation of the law.

    This was a complete coverup. Whether it was race or poliitcs or both is another question but I wouldn't put it past Holder for a second to be about race.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  6. #6
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    Oh its obvious racism on the part of the black panthers.
    No argument there, although to be fair to the original Black Panthers, these guys have nothing to do with the real Black Panthers, which don't exist anymore, and the Huey Newton foundation publicly condemned this organization long ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    Even an uber liberal came out and said what they were doing was a clear violation of the law.
    Well, that "uber liberal" has his own axe to grind against Obama since before this incident, so take his word with a grain of salt.

    And the guys doing the voter intimidation might have clearly violated the law, but that isn't the same as clearly getting a civil injunction. Holder has to consider what he can actually prove in court.

    This is a trumped up issue without a doubt.
    Last edited by Guy Incognito; 07-01-10 at 11:40 AM.

  7. #7
    Dispenser of Negativity
    Cold Highway's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Newburgh, New York and World 8: Dark Land
    Last Seen
    12-24-12 @ 11:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    9,596
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    Oh its obvious racism on the part of the black panthers. They are dressed all in black with batons and white person after white person said they tried to block them calling them white trash, honkey, etc.

    Even an uber liberal came out and said what they were doing was a clear violation of the law.
    Pretty much; 1. Voter Intimidation and 2. Illegaly providing "security". In NY only election officials or local/state police can legally provide security.
    Jackboots always come in matched pairs, a left boot and a right boot.

  8. #8
    Sage

    Mason66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:39 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    19,444

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Incognito View Post
    No argument there, although to be fair to the original Black Panthers, these guys have nothing to do with the real Black Panthers, which don't exist anymore, and the Huey Newton foundation publicly condemned this organization long ago.



    Well, that "uber liberal" has his own axe to grind against Obama since before this incident, so take his word with a grain of salt.

    And the guys doing the voter intimidation might have clearly violated the law, but that isn't the same as clearly getting a civil injunction. Holder has to consider what he can actually prove in court.

    This is a trumped up issue without a doubt.
    Holder didn't have to prove anything in court.

    The case was already decided. The defendants never showed up to answer the charges so a default judgemente was issued against all of them.

    Then the Justice Department threw out the convictions against all but one and then watered down the punishment on the last one.

    Why would the Justice Department throw out convictions if it is not politically motivated? I can't think of a reason.

    If the defendants don't show up to defend their position, then the charges stand.

    I have never heard of a prosecutor then going back and throwing out convictions out of the goodness of their heart.

    There are a lot of questions about this case and I hope we see answers soon.

    There will never be a more clear case of votor intimidation and to not have convictions in this case is just crazy.

  9. #9
    Sage
    Guy Incognito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last Seen
    12-02-17 @ 07:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    11,216

    Re: Former Justice Department Lawyer Accuses Holder of Dropping New Black Panther Cas

    Quote Originally Posted by Mason66 View Post
    The case was already decided. The defendants never showed up to answer the charges so a default judgemente was issued against all of them.
    That's not quite accurate. Just because they didn't show up does not mean a default judgement is going to be entered against them. The judge can't give an injunction for no reason. Holder does have to show that there is a reason for the injunction whether the defendants show up or not, that's just how it works. Just because the defendant isn't there to answer it, the plaintiff still can't get an injunction if the plaintiff cannot show cause, which in this case might have been hard to show against some of the intimidators. One of them did get slapped with an injunction, and I'm betting with was the one carrying the baton. It might have been harder to show cause for the others, that's a judgment call

    Quote Originally Posted by Mason66 View Post
    Then the Justice Department threw out the convictions against all but one and then watered down the punishment on the last one.

    Why would the Justice Department throw out convictions if it is not politically motivated? I can't think of a reason.

    If the defendants don't show up to defend their position, then the charges stand.
    They weren't ever "charged" with anything and there were no "convictions" to water down, this was a civil suit for an injunction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mason66 View Post
    I have never heard of a prosecutor then going back and throwing out convictions out of the goodness of their heart.
    Me neither, there was no prosecutor, this was civil.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mason66 View Post
    There are a lot of questions about this case and I hope we see answers soon.
    Maybe that's true, but we need to understand the situation first in order to proceed. Holder seems pretty clearly to have been within his discretion, but the allegation that the career attorneys wanted to go ahead with the suit and the administration decided to drop it does make it look like there was some politicization. But making it into an overblown issue with accusations of racism like WSJ and Fox News are doing isn't going to help get to the bottom of things.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mason66 View Post
    There will never be a more clear case of votor intimidation and to not have convictions in this case is just crazy.
    I pray you're right about this, but I highly doubt it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •