- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Oh this is gonna be good, I can hardly wait to read the rest of this. Have you READ the Arizona Law? Or are you just parroting the DNC Talking points, let's find out!.That is not the way the Arizona law works.
As I suspected, you haven't read the law, have no clue how it works and are parroting liberal lies. Your lean might be listed as "Undisclosed" under your name, but one merely needs to read what you write to see just how far left you fall.Cops can do ID inspections anywhere they please, including if you are just walking down the street.
Exactly where DO you get your lies? Media Matters? Whitehouse.gov? Which propaganda site? MSNBC? Olbermann? Maddow???They only need the pre-tense of you being an illegal immigrant to demand ID.
See this is what you've been TOLD to believe, and like a good UI Soldier, you don't bother to think past what you've been ordered to think.If you can't produce it then they can detain you, even if they didn't have prior probable cause (i.e. you were committing a crime). Simply accusing you of being an illegal is enough.
Seeing as you haven't any clue how the Arizona Law works, and it's a simple bit of reading, one can only dismiss your assessment of the complex Patriot Act outright.Kind of reminds me of the PATRIOT Act in that as soon as they fabricate a terrorism accusation, your rights go out the window.
If your version of the law was real, I'd be with you, but you are so far off base as to what the law says, and does that people should be opposed to taking you seriously from this point on.People should be opposed to the Arizona law because of this.
Expect, that you are the sheep, who believes lies about what this law says and does.However, people are sheep and if it supports their pet causes they will gladly let rights be trampled on.
And for good reason, Sex Offenders have the highest recidivism rate of all criminals. Once you've shown you're a sex fiend, the Gov't has too assess how dangerous. Your rights do not include buggering children.Same thing with the recent SCOTUS ruling that lets the Fed extent detention to an indefinite period if you are a "dangerous" sex offender, and without trial by peers.
I shall now educate you, so sit back, take notes and prepare.
So, what you've been rallying against, has been a US LAW SINCE 1940.Myth No. 1: The law requires aliens to carry identification that they weren't already required to carry. On the contrary, the law simply penalizes aliens who fail to carry the registration documents that federal law already requires them to keep on their person. These federal crimes (8 United States Code Section 1304(a) or 1306(e)) have been around since 1940. The Arizona law simply adds a layer of state penalty to what already was a crime under federal law.
...As for U.S. citizens, the law does not require them to carry any identification whatsoever. Indeed, the law cannot possibly be applied against U.S. citizens; only an alien can be found guilty under the Arizona statute.
Myth No. 2: The law will encourage racial profiling. The terms of the act make clear that such profiling cannot occur. Section 2 provides that a law enforcement official "may not solely consider race, color, or national origin" in making any stops or determining an alien's immigration status. In addition, all of the normal Fourth Amendment protections against racial profiling still apply.
Moreover, the law actually reduces the likelihood of racial profiling by forcing police officers to contact the federal government to verify a person's immigration status when they suspect a person is an illegal alien. It already was permissible for police officers across the country to make arrests for violations of federal immigration law where reasonable suspicion existed that a violation had occurred. Now, in Arizona, officers will have to make a phone call to Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) 24/7 hot line to confirm that any aliens in their custody really are present unlawfully. Officers can no longer proceed based solely on their own assessment of a person's immigration status. In this way, the Arizona law takes any consideration of race out of the equation - strengthening the protections against racial profiling.
Oh look, it was designed too, and used existing programs and laws to help avoid any "Profiling"! The chef, btw is preparing your crow.
And finally, the nail in the coffin of the lies you spew:
FREEDOM EDEN: Arizona Immigration Law MythsMyth No. 3: The law will require Arizona police officers to stop and question people. Here again, critics of the law are failing to read it carefully. The law only kicks in when a police officer already has made a "lawful contact" with a person, such as stopping him for breaking another law. The most likely contact is during the issuance of a speeding ticket. The law does not require the officer to begin questioning a person about his immigration status or to do anything the officer would not otherwise do.
Only after a stop is made, and subsequently the officer develops reasonable suspicion on his own that an immigration law has been violated, is any obligation imposed. At that point, the officer is required to call ICE to confirm whether the person is an illegal alien. Are critics seriously suggesting that local law enforcement officers should ignore the violations of federal law that they see at that point?
KOBACH: Arizona acts as Washington dithers - Washington Times
Your crow is served sir, bon appetit!